Official Comment Count: 1,037,239

Search this blog

Profile


Please read the DISCLAIMERS.

markhoofnagle.jpg Mark Hoofnagle has a PhD in physiology from the University of Virginia and is currently a 3rd year medical student. His interest in denialism concerns the use of denialist tactics to confuse public understanding of scientific knowledge.

Chris Hoofnagle Chris Hoofnagle is a recovering Washington, DC lawyer and information privacy law expert at UC-Berkeley Law School. Denialism became apparent to him while working on consumer protection laws in Washington. The Denialists' Deck of Cards is essentially a how-to guide for being an industry lobbyist.

PalMD.jpgPalMD is a practicing internist in the Midwestern United States. Aside from the great joy he finds in his family and his work, he likes communicating some of that joy to others. He has a special interest in the ways patients---and we are all patients at one time or another---are deceived by charlatans. He aims to change the world, one reader at a time. Previous writings can still be found here.

Please read the DISCLAIMERS.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Blog carnivals

  • asclepius_phixr%282%29.jpg
  • BadgeMed.jpg

    Other

    Add to Technorati Favorites
    Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

    « Update: Wilson vs. Science | Main | No right answers »

    Medical Education---service vs. education

    Category: Medical Education
    Posted on: July 14, 2008 3:20 PM, by PalMD

    Teaching new doctors is an interesting process. Much has been done over the last ten years to improve the way we teach new doctors. Medical residents still work very hard, but there are strict rules on work hours and other "service" duties that can interfere with education and safety.

    One of the issues that often comes up in running a residency program is the problem of "service" vs. "education". Per the accrediting body that does these things:


    The learning objectives of the program must not be compromised by excessive reliance on residents to fulfill service obligations.

    Along with details such as work hours limitations, this is one of the more important guiding principles for residencies. This can be a real problem on certain very busy medical services, such as an intensive care unit.

    Residency is work; there is no getting around that. But in exchange for this work, residents expect to receive teaching, feedback, and respect. There are operational measures of these parameters used in evaluating residency programs.

    When residents aren't treated with respect, aren't given proper feedback, and aren't taught, it frankly pisses me off. These young doctors are counting on us to mitigate their fears and build their confidence. They are counting on us to impart the practical knowledge that they will use to save lives. There is very little justification for using a resident as your personal scut-monkey, and even less for yelling, degrading, or otherwise humiliating them. That's not how you make good doctors.

    Comments

    On the one hand, there's a certain "misery loves company" component that makes me glad that basic research with our post-docs aren't the only one with a rather perculiar (and potentially highly exploitable) trainee period.

    On the other hand, it makes me just as pissed off that intelligent, educated people in any career path aren't treated with respect and trained properly (via feedback and teaching).
    Plus, since I'm guessing I will probably be a patient in the care of a resident at some point or another, I get to be worried that putting them in a poor state of mind may negatively impact my health. Great.

    Posted by: Becca | July 14, 2008 5:30 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





    Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

    Blogs in the Network

    Advertisement

    Top Five: Most German

    Search All Blogs