Today's Journal reports on the delicate task of creating a monument to Galileo Galilei at the Vatican. But there's still some opposition. Check this out from the very end of the article:
On the other side of the barricades, meanwhile, some Roman Catholics think the church has already done more than enough to make up with Galileo.
Atila Sinke Guimarães, a conservative Catholic writer, dismisses the church's mistreatment of Galileo as a "black legend."
The scientist, he says, got what he deserved. "The Inquisition was very moderate with him. He wasn't tortured."
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Martin Cothran asks: Are there really 15.1 million poor people in the United States?
Short answer: Yes. Cothran doesn't actually answer, but strongly implies that he thinks the answer is: no. To justify this, he claims:
A multi-millionaire who owns several houses (with servants' quarters),…
Pope Benedict XVI last night called off a visit to Rome's main university in the face of hostility from some of its academics and students, who accused him of despising science and defending the Inquisition's condemnation of Galileo.
The Pope is a Dope, says Rome U
The controversy was unparalleled…
Yesterday's post on Rick Perry's Galileo gaffe has gotten a lot of attention, much supportive, but some critical. On twitter, historians of science Rebekah Higgit and Thony Christie have helped me sort out some of the threads. I don't think this alters any of the basic results, but it's worth…
Among those who argue that science and religion are compatible, there is a standard script that goes like this:
In the late nineteenth century, John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White published, respectively, History of the Conflict Between Science and Religion and A History of the Warfare of…
um... Poe?
He's basically saying they could have tortured him if they wanted to, but they wanted to be nice to him.
Oh, well, in that case! If they didn't torture him, then they were more than lenient in how they treated him?
Wow!
He wasn't tortured but he was given the first and second degrees, i.e. threatened and then shown instruments of torture, the uses of which were explained to him. The third degree was the actual torture.
So hurray for Christianity - it doesn't torture honest people for telling the truth. I imagine the converts will be storming the churches after that revelation.
What, he was just waterboarded?
Ah, the Galileo myth.
In case anyone actually cares, he wasn't brought up on charges for his science. As it happens, Urban (the Pope) was quite the natural philosopher in his own right, with some rather good work in botany. He and Galileo corresponded quite a bit and in general the Pope was supportive of Galileo's work in natural philosophy.
Galileo, on the other hand, was a Grade A ass. In the course of an otherwise normal disagreement on science, he went all ad hominem on the Pope, and did it very publicly. What would generally be considered a Career Limiting Move today, and that's pretty much the same then, without the labor laws.
He ended up getting off very easy precisely because the same person (Pope Urban) that he'd libeled pulled strings to get him maximum leniency. Any other prince (and make no mistake, the Pope was a monarch as well as a priest) would have had his head off after the first flame.
(roll-eyes) So it was for not kowtowing to attempts to censor his science? And the relevant difference is? And placement of his books on the Vatican's list of banned books? That was just because he didn't follow guidelines about fonts and margins, right?
When will the Vatican put up a statue of Giordano Bruno?
The account given by D. C. Sessions does not agree with that in the only relevant book on my shelves, Dava Sobel's Galileo's Daughter, which relates
and, regarding the Dialogue which was to be the basis of the Inquisition's charges, it featured a character named
but
and the witch-hunt was on. Only if you take up the side of Cardinal Bellarmino (described in Michael White's biography of Bruno as one who "did more than anyone of his time to hold back the flood of secular intellectual progress, earning him the epithet 'Hammer of the Heretics.'") can the "Grade A ass" slander get any traction.
When will they erect a memorial to the hundred-thousand or so "witches" also removed from circulation by the Holy Inquisition and its emulators?