Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Profile

Please read the DISCLAIMERS.

markhoofnagle.jpg Mark Hoofnagle has a MD and PhD in physiology from the University of Virginia, and is now a general surgery resident. His interest in denialism concerns the use of denialist tactics to confuse public understanding of scientific knowledge.

Chris Hoofnagle Chris Hoofnagle teaches privacy and computer crime law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. A former Washington lawyer, Chris wrote the The Denialists' Deck of Cards based upon his experiences working on consumer protection.

PalMD.jpg PalMD is a practicing internist in the Midwestern United States. Aside from the great joy he finds in his family and his work, he likes communicating some of that joy to others. He has a special interest in the ways patients---and we are all patients at one time or another---are deceived by charlatans. He aims to change the world, one reader at a time. Previous writings can still be found here.

Please read the DISCLAIMERS.


HONcode Certified

This blog is hosted by SEED Media Group; ad space on the top and right side belongs to them. The rest of the content is HONcode certified.

This website is accredited by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Blog carnivals

  • asclepius_phixr%282%29.jpg
  • BadgeMed.jpg

    Other

    « Are Patients in Universal Healthcare Countries Less Satisfied? | Main | What's health care like in Australia? »

    NHS has broken the cycle!

    Category: Science
    Posted on: May 23, 2009 2:43 PM, by MarkH

    A few days ago I asked how do we break this cycle of news reports based on terrible misreading of the scientific literature literature. All these reports do is spread misinformation and undermine trust in scientific research.

    Well, the British National Health System has the answer! Via Ben Goldacre, I've found my new, favorite website, Behind the Headlines at NHS. It's the Snopes.com equivalent for shoddy science journalism. Every day they examine what health news is making the headlines, share it with scientific and clinical experts, and they report on the science in a way that's actually accurate.

    So, ignoring the question of why don't journalists do their job correctly in the first place so we don't need this service, I'm thrilled to hear of its existence. It seems inefficient though. First university PR departments and journalists have to mangle the science, then we need to have scientists put it back together again. We should just have scientists report on the literature, like at scienceblogs! Instead we have a bunch of incompetent boobs spoon-feeding the public total garbage without anyone writing in to complain when they turn in stories that are essentially complete fiction.

    For instance read about Man Flu story at Behind the Headlines, then look at the Daily Mail article or BBC reporting that started this mess.

    The authors of this dreck should be fired for journalistic incompetence, and the scientist she quoted (if indeed she was quoted correctly) should consider never talking to a journalist again as they make it appear that she doesn't even understand her own research. The scientists too in this instance appear culpable as it seems they were happy to help spread completely simplistic, and I think frankly false interpretations of their data.

    Luckily, the NHS is providing a public service to the citizens of the UK, and indeed the world, by replacing such nonsense reporting with thoughtful, considered articles that actually explain the science and inform the public.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    Comments

    1

    Got one like that being blogged about at PZ's site, but here is the direct link:

    http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/idalized_the_brand_of_a_fossil/

    Apparently, the ability of his hype to be misused by creationists, its vapid insistence of crediting his find with being the most important thing in the universe, or at least 47 million years of it, etc., isn't a huge problem. Someone need to slap this idiot up side the head and remind him why P.T. Barnum was considered a con artist, and undermined scientific efforts, not a "respected scientist", or anything else worth emulating.

    Posted by: Kagehi Author Profile Page | May 23, 2009 4:23 PM

    2

    Thanks for alerting us to this service. It appears that NHS contracts with a company called Bazian (http://www.bazian.com/index.html) to do this analysis.

    I wonder if you are familiar with the work of Gary Schwitzer and HealthNewReview.org.

    http://www.tc.umn.edu/~schwitz/

    http://blog.lib.umn.edu/schwitz/healthnews/

    http://www.HealthNewsReview.org/

    Posted by: Marilyn Mann | May 24, 2009 10:03 AM

    3

    Hmm. Their article on the recent acupuncture back pain study doesn't seem too good, though.

    Posted by: Skemono | May 24, 2009 3:52 PM

    4
    So, ignoring the question of why don't journalists do their job correctly in the first place [...] The authors of this dreck should be fired for journalistic incompetence

    I know I've said this sort of thing here before, but I guess I'm just going to have to keep hammering at it until it sinks in. It is not a journalist's job to accurately inform the public, no matter how much they protest the contrary. Their job is simply to write copy which enables their paper to sell advertising space. Newspapers have no "public service" remit. They are simply for-profit companies.

    The idea that newspapers exist to inform the public is merely part of their marketing. They exist to make money. If printing misinformation or even outright lies is more profitable than printing the truth, that's exactly what they're going to do.

    Posted by: Dunc | May 26, 2009 7:18 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.