Now on ScienceBlogs: Science Poem Manifesto

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Developing Intelligence

[ over time, across species, and cross-platform ]

Profile

Chris Chatham is a grad student at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Currently Reading

July 27, 2010

SyNAPSE: In Pusuit of The Cognitive Platform

Artificial IntelligenceComputational Modeling ] 

"What we're seeking is not just one algorithm or one cool new trick - we're seeking a platform technology. In other words, we're not seeking the entirety of a collection of point solutions, what we're seeking is a platform technology on which we can build a wide variety of solutions."

Dharmendra Modha, manager of cognitive computing at IBM Research Almaden, discusses the Systems of Neuromorphic Adaptive Plastic Scalable Electronics ("SyNAPSE") project. Mad scientist eyes are also on display:

crazyeyes.jpg

Video after the jump:

July 23, 2010

A Backseat Driver in The Brain? dPFC helps you find your way; vlPFC may just say "wrong turn!"

Cognitive Neuroscience ] 

Decisions can be hard: the conflict you face in any decision can be increased if option A is not that much better than option B, or if option A is newly worse than option B. And then there are are just bad decisions, maybe hard only in retrospect. As illustrated by a 2009 J Neurosci article from Mitchell, Luo, Avny et al it seems that dorsal areas of the prefrontal cortex might help guide us in making tough decisions, whereas a ventrolateral prefrontal area might just alert us only after a bad decision was made.

July 22, 2010

Two varieities of reinforcement learning: Striatal & Prefrontal/Parietal?

Artificial IntelligenceCognitive NeuroscienceComputational Modeling ] 

Recent work has leveraged increasingly sophisticated computational models of neural processing as a way of predicting the BOLD response on a trial-by-trial basis. The core idea behind much of this work is that reinforcement learning is a good model for the way the brain learns about its environment; the specific idea is that expectations are compared with outcomes so that a "prediction error" can be calculated and minimized through reshaping expectations and behavior. This simple idea leads to exceedingly powerful insights into the way the brain works, with numerous applications to improving learning in artificial agents, to understanding the role of exploration in behavior and development, and to understanding how the brain exerts adaptive control over behavior.

So far, however, neuroimaging and electrophysiology suggest that these prediction error signals can be found through much of the cortex, including large swaths of parietal, frontal, and striatal areas.

This is where a 2010 Neuron paper by Gläscher, Daw, Dayan & O'Doherty comes to the rescue. Traditionally, reinforcement learning has been viewed as a somewhat monolithic entity, such that expected rewards are compared with reward outcomes to generate a "reward prediction error." It's easy to imagine that most of the brain might light up in response to rewards. But Gläscher take this a step farther, and dissociate between two flavors of reinforcement learning (RL):

July 15, 2010

Links: Blogging on the Brain 7/15/2010

Link Posts ] 

Swarming Quadrocopters?

Nanomagnetic remote control of animal behavior.

Blogs are data-mined for personality research.

Vote for method of the year! (My vote is for induced pluripotency)

If you think that the less competent you are, the more competent you think you are, then you are incompetent.Confusion on the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Time on task effects in fMRI research: why you should care.

Spontaneous Eyeblink Rate as an Index of Creativity.

The advantage of being helpless: infants can outperform adults in some ways.

Career Considerations: Center Grants and P-mechanisms from the NIH

Get up to date on functions of the insula.

A recap of Pinker's recent thoughts on the evolution of human intelligence.

Lies in Online Dating.

Understand probability. Wager. Profit.

July 14, 2010

Destination: Computational Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Artificial IntelligenceCognitive NeuroscienceComputational ModelingDevelopmental Psychology ] 

How can we enhance perception, learning, memory, and cognitive control? Any answer to this question will require a better understanding of the way they are best enhanced: through cognitive change in early development.

But we can't stop there. We also want to know more about the neural substrates that enable and reflect these cognitive transformations across development. Some information is provided by developmental neuroimaging, but even that's not enough, because the real question we have can only be answered via mechanisms ("how"/"why") - quite different than the "what" "where" and "roughly when" questions addressed by neuroimaging. For "how/why," we ultimately need a mathematical way of describing cognitive changes and how they unfold in tandem with changes in neural information processing. This, Russ Poldrack argues in his 2010 HBM paper, can come only from a computational integration of cognitive and neural development: something called "computational developmental cognitive neuroscience."

July 13, 2010

4 Things to Keep in Mind When Reading fMRI Studies

Cognitive NeuroscienceDevelopmental Psychology ] 

A nice 2010 Human Brain Mapping paper by Church, Petersen & Schlaggar covers a number of interpretational issues confronting modern neuroimaging. Their particular application is pediatric neuroimaging (I will also use developmental examples), but the general issues apply to nearly all fMRI studies. So here are some important things to keep in mind whenever you read an fMRI study:

Developmental Divergence in Univariate and Multivariate fMRI Analyses

Cognitive NeuroscienceDevelopmental Psychology ] 

A 2010 FINS paper from Cohen et al. demonstrates that multivariate patterns in neural recruitment during response inhibition across the brain are significantly predictive of response inhibition ability and age of the scanned subject, and shows that other factors (such as response variability and reaction times) cannot be similarly predicted from the same data.

July 12, 2010

Hierarchical Prefrontal Control: Exception Proves the Rule?

Artificial IntelligenceCognitive NeuroscienceComputational Modeling ] 

What if we got the organization of prefrontal cortex all wrong - maybe even backwards? That seems to be a conclusion one might draw from a 2010 Neuroimage paper by Yoshida, Funakoshi, & Ishii. But that would be the wrong conclusion: thanks to an ingenious mistake, Yoshida et al have apparently managed to "reverse" the functional organization of prefrontal cortex.

July 9, 2010

Parallel Search in Rule Space Enabled By Prefrontal Hierarchies

Artificial IntelligenceCognitive NeuroscienceComputational Modeling ] 

Hierarchical views of prefrontal organization posit that some information processing principle, and not just task difficulty, determines which areas of prefrontal cortex will be recruited in a given task. Virtually all information processing accounts of the prefrontal hierarchy are agreed on this point, though they differ in whether the operative principle is thought to be the temporal duration over which information must be maintained, the relational complexity of that information, the number of conditionalities necessary to consider in behaving on that information, or the inherent abstraction of the underlying representations.

All of these ideas seem to mesh with an intuitive sense of what it means for something to be "difficult," such that one might as well say that more difficult things activate more anterior regions of the prefrontal cortex. Ruling out difficulty as an explanation has thus been a pernicious problem for much of this work. Typically, the attempted arguments rely on the behavioral expression of difficulty (long reaction times or high error rates) not following the same patterns as neural activation. But these arguments are complicated by the fact that the behavioral expression of difficulty might be muddled if subjects recruit additional regions of prefrontal cortex in response to perceived difficulty.

Thankfully, this issue has been definitively addressed by a 2010 Neuron paper from Badre, Kayser & D'Esposito. In the process they've provided numerous insights into the way an integrated prefrontal-striatal circuit might support an information processing hierarchy and "parallel search" in service of the discovery of rules for governing behavior.

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Facebook
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Advertisement
Change.org|Start Petition

© 2006-2010 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.