Seed Media Group

Discovering Biology in a Digital World

My thoughts on biology, teaching, life, and exploring the living world via the digital one. Only my opinions are represented by these postings, they do not represent the viewpoints of any funding agency or Geospiza, Inc.

Profile

Sandra Porter I am a microbiologist and molecular biologist turned tenured biotech faculty turned bioinformatics scientist turned entrepreneur. My passion is developing instructional materials for 21st century biology (Digital World Biology).

Search

Digital World Biology

Discover Biology with Bioinformatics

Subscribe to our newsletter


e-mail digitalbio at scienceblogs.com

use 'Digital World Biology' news as the subject

DigitalBio Favorites

Science Blogs School Fundraiser


link_donorschoose_small.gif


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Blogroll

Science Education Groups

Keep up to date

Awards

Red Orbit

Digital Bio at Blogged

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences
Add Digital Bio to your Technorati Favorites!





Follow me on Twitter

When you need to laugh

Interesting places

The Tangled Bank
MicrobeWorld Radio

Locations of visitors to this page

Archives

« Will the real jellyfish please stand up? | Main | Digital Biology Friday: Searching for synonyms »

GloFish® really glow!

Category: Biotechnology
Posted on: October 12, 2006 12:25 PM, by Sandra Porter

Yesterday, I wrote about photographs of jellyfish that were altered by newspapers, scientific publishers, science education companies, and me (for the purpose of the article) to make it look like the jellyfish glowed.

Those jellyfish do NOT glow. Those images lie or at least misrepresent the truth.

But that doesn't mean that glowing animals don't exist. These pictures were taken under natural light and came from GloFish®.

glofish_6_low_res.jpg

Normally zebrafish are white with black stripes, but these zebrafish have been genetically engineered to produce a fluorescent protein that makes the fish glow. The company web site doesn't identify the protein, but I would guess it's probably a mutant version of the GFP protein that I wrote about yesterday.

Fish as pollution detectors
There's also an interesting story from the National University of Singapore about the development of these fish. The eventual goal is to use fish like these, as pollution detectors. The idea is that you could put detector fish into water, and if the water contained pollutants, the fish would glow. Environmental companies already do toxicity assays where they detect pollutants by putting fish into water. If the water contains harmful substances, the fish usually die or produce deformed offspring. Glowing fish could make the assay quicker. If toxic compounds can be detected more quickly, then rivers, streams, and lakes could be protected more quickly.

glofish_7_low_res.jpg

How would this work?
I'm cutting out a few steps, but this is the basic idea. Genes can be "turned on" or "turned off" when substances in the environment send the right kind of message to a cell. When the message is received, special kinds of proteins binds to specific sequences of DNA. These proteins attract other proteins, who make an RNA copy of the DNA. The RNA copy contains the directins for making the protein (GFP). GFP undergoes a chemical reaction and begins to glow.

The net result would be detector fish that would start to glow in the presence of harmful substances.

I don't know if the technology is worked out yet for the detector fish.

GloFish® on the other hand, are pets. They glow in clean water and live longer in clean water, too.


Reference:
1. GloFish® www.glofish.com
2. Zebrafish as pollution indicators, Natural University of Singapore, accessed Oct. 12, 2006.

technorati tags: , , , , , ,

Copyright Geospiza, Inc.

Comments

A practical difficulty with glowing-in-response-to-pollution fishkins is their enhanced detectability and succulence to predators. It may be difficult to document an increased population of glow-fish, though barracuda may eventually show a homey glow in the nether regions.

Posted by: VJB | October 12, 2006 2:26 PM

True. This probably would NOT be a beneficial trait for a small fish.

I don't think they're planning to release the fish into the wild, though. I think an environmental testing lab would collect water samples, bring the samples in to the lab, and pop a fish in each one to see if the fish turned color.

Posted by: Sandra Porter | October 12, 2006 2:33 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Creation Astronomy 05.21.2009 · PZ Myers
  2. The latest NOM ad 05.19.2009 · PZ Myers
  3. Ian Plimer lies about source of his figure 3 05.15.2009 · Tim Lambert
  4. Plimer and Arctic warming 05.21.2009 · Tim Lambert
  5. Shush! This is an Examining Room! 05.21.2009 · Zuska