Seed Media Group

Discovering Biology in a Digital World

My thoughts on biology, teaching, life, and exploring the living world via the digital one. Only my opinions are represented by these postings, they do not represent the viewpoints of any funding agency or Geospiza, Inc.

Profile

Sandra Porter I am a microbiologist and molecular biologist turned tenured biotech faculty turned bioinformatics scientist turned entrepreneur. My passion is developing instructional materials for 21st century biology (Geospiza Education).

Search this blog

Learn about DNA with molecular models

Exploring DNA Structure


Subscribe to Geospiza Education News


e-mail digitalbio at gmail.com


DigitalBio Favorites

Molecular Momentos


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Rotating Blogroll

Science Education Groups

Science Blogs School Fundraiser



Keep up to date

Awards

Red Orbit

Digital Bio at Blogged


Add Digital Bio to your Technorati Favorites!

Interesting places

  • xkcd
  • The Tangled Bank
    MicrobeWorld Radio

    « Whatever happened to Bill Nye the Science Guy? | Main | It's not just spring in the air, it's APRIL in the molecular modeling database »

    Dinosaur DNA discovered in GenBank

    Category: BioinformaticsHumorsequence analysis
    Posted on: April 1, 2008 8:18 AM, by Sandra Porter

    Is it real or is it April Fools?

    The March 21st issue of Science has an interesting news article by Elizabeth Pennisi and a letter to the editor about a proposal to wikify GenBank. Currently, the NCBI holds the original authors responsible for editing or correcting entries and this does cause problems when those authors fail to return to the scene and fix what they've submitted. Some researchers are suggesting that third parties be allowed to fix some of those mistakes or at least add comments to records, to warn the unwary.

    There are some good arguments on both sides and it's certainly easy to see why the NCBI would be reluctant to take on the assignment of having to arbitrate disagreements between researchers.

    Besides, if we cleaned up GenBank, we'd lose charming entries (and great teaching examples) like this:

    dinosaur.png


    References:

    Elizabeth Pennisi, "Proposal to 'Wikify' GenBank Meets Stiff Resistance," Science 21 March 2008 319:1598 - 1599 (subscription required).


    Comments

    #1

    And what is that sequence? Human?

    Posted by: David Marjanović | April 2, 2008 8:55 AM

    #2

    Oh no, definitely not human.

    Posted by: Sandra Porter | April 2, 2008 9:28 AM

    #3

    It is E.coli... Figures...

    Posted by: aq | April 2, 2008 11:03 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





    Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

    Search All Blogs

    Blogs in the Network

    Top Five: Most Active

    1. I hear wedding bells… 05.15.2008 · PZ Myers
    2. Flamboyance! 05.15.2008 · PZ Myers
    3. No Abortion! No Exceptions! 05.15.2008 · Ed Brayton
    4. Bush's Latest Power Grab 05.15.2008 · Ed Brayton
    5. Needing software recommendation 05.15.2008 · John Lynch

    Top Science Stories

    powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com