Seed Media Group

Discovering Biology in a Digital World

My thoughts on biology, teaching, life, and exploring the living world via the digital one. Only my opinions are represented by these postings, they do not represent the viewpoints of any funding agency or Geospiza, Inc.

Profile

Sandra Porter I am a microbiologist and molecular biologist turned tenured biotech faculty turned bioinformatics scientist turned entrepreneur. My passion is developing instructional materials for 21st century biology (Geospiza Education).

Search this blog

Learn about DNA with molecular models

Exploring DNA Structure


Subscribe to Geospiza Education News


e-mail digitalbio at gmail.com


DigitalBio Favorites

Molecular Mementos


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Blogroll

Science Education Groups

Science Blogs School Fundraiser



Keep up to date

Awards

Red Orbit

Digital Bio at Blogged

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences
Add Digital Bio to your Technorati Favorites!

When you need to laugh

Interesting places

The Tangled Bank
MicrobeWorld Radio

Archives

« Support animal research, save lives | Main | Book review: "The Animal Research War" »

The five little Boogers and how they grew

Category: BiotechnologyDogsHumorcloning pets and other animals
Posted on: August 7, 2008 12:31 PM, by Sandra Porter

Leave it to those wacky Korean cloners. In December, scientists from Gyeongsang National University gave us fluorescent kitties. Now, we have cute little puppies!

These aren't the first cloned pets on the market, we have stores that sell glowing fish. But these clones have a bit higher price tag. For $50,000 Bernann McKinney got 5 new "Boogers" from RNL Bio; "Booger McKinney," "Booger Lee," "Booger Ra," "Booger Hong and "Booger Park." That's $10,000 a Booger!

Still, who can resist these cute little boogers? I have a picture of the puppies below the fold and as you can see, they're adorable!

boogers

image from Associated press

You can also see Ms. McKinney squeezing one her brand new Boogers here (AP article).

It's a heartwarming story. From USA Today, the original Booger

saved her life when she was attacked by another dog three times his size. The incident resulted in her left hand being severely injured, and injured her leg nerves and stomach. Doctors later reconstructed her hand and she spent part of her recovery in a wheelchair.

Ms. McKinney had a strong attachment to her dog. She had even tried to get Booger clones before from Genetics Savings and Clone but they shut down in 2006, leaving her Booger-less.

This time the cloning produced a result. The team, headed by Korean scientist Lee Byeong-chun, claims to have identified the clones as genuine. The claim is being tested by another group at Lee's University.

I know there are people who will criticize Ms. McKinney and say she was misguided and she hasn't really restored her beloved Booger to life. They're right of course. But I also know many people who always get the same breed of dog because they like the personality traits that are characteristic of that breed. And, who can blame dog owners for forgetting sometimes that the second dog is not the same dog as the first? Emotions aren't logical. I think for all practical purposes, Ms. McKinney's cloned Boogers are close enough.

And they're really, really cute.

UPDATE: The New Scientist blog (and lots of news reports) tell us that Bernann McKinney's story is even more unusual than that of her pups. This picture shows what one of the puppies has to say.

Comments

#1

$50k for a dog which will live for probably less than half of the average lifespan of that breed? Not the best financial investment ever.

Posted by: TomJoe | August 7, 2008 12:58 PM

#2

Oh, I'd never say that was a good investment. It's just that people don't think rationally when it comes to their pets.

Posted by: Sandra Porter | August 7, 2008 1:00 PM

#3

Speaking of thinking rationally ... it seems that Ms. Kinney may be a bail jumper, convicted of kidnapping and rape back in 1978.
New Scientist Blog report on Bernann/Joyce McKinney.

Posted by: TomJoe | August 7, 2008 1:13 PM

#4

Thanks TomJoe,

This story just gets more interesting all the time. Maybe next we'll find out she's a Raelian.

Posted by: Sandra Porter | August 7, 2008 1:26 PM

#5

Done and done. Clones of my dog, Izzy (Izzinator McWizzface) are now available for $15k

http://i34.tinypic.com/290vviw.jpg

http://i38.tinypic.com/2mn3gn7.jpg

Posted by: Andrew | August 7, 2008 3:32 PM

#6

Andrew: I love the bee outfit. What a cutie!

Posted by: Sandra Porter | August 7, 2008 4:03 PM

#7

"Not the best financial investment ever."

That depends on how much money a person has to burn and what they consider a good return. Not everything pays dividends in cash.

Posted by: Ian | August 8, 2008 8:26 AM

#8

Hi
in fact, it is all a lie, a fraud, a PR fraud. read on

I am doing research on this fake cloning Booger story. Ms McKinney is
a serial liar. she lied about being a screen writer, she lied about
teaching drama "at several US colleges, she lied at first about being
the Mormon rapist, and did you know she did not have to pay full
150,0o0 USD fee, reduced to just 50,000 for her, because she HELPED
OUT with publicity, according to the lab. read between the lines,
those dogs were not cloned from booger's dna, they are just normal
puppies, cute as hell, but we been had by a serial liar. i am looking
into this. it's funny, and sad. WATCH THIS STORY IMPLODE…..

Comment by danny bloom — August 12, 2008 @ 5:18 am


RNL Bio charges up to $150,000 for dog cloning but will receive just a
third of that sum from McKinney because she is the first customer and
helped with publicity, said company head Ra Jeong-chan.

****smoking gun……HELPED WITH PR.,……see!

Comment by danny bloom — August 12, 2008 @ 5:18 am


this story from Korea was in JUNE, notice the first sentence qualifier
in the photo "CLAIMED TO BE" CLONED DOGS

danny

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2008/06/133_25184.html

Three claimed-to-be clones of a family dog Missy, produced in between
December 2007 and April 2008 by Hwang Woo-suk.

Comment by danny bloom — August 12, 2008 @ 5:18 am

Posted by: danny bloom | August 12, 2008 7:46 AM

#9

Sandra
what i mean, is, those dogs were never cloned. the entire story was a fake PR ploy by the clone firm in Kroea, with PR cooperation by Ms McKinney. You need to read between the lines. nobody has yet verified that the dogs were actually clones and NOBODY EVER WILL, because they were not cloned,. blog on this now. it's very sad. the entire world got faked by this amaizng Pr lady

Hi
I am doing research on this fake cloning Booger story. Ms McKinney is
a serial liar. she lied about being a screen writer, she lied about
teaching drama "at several US colleges, she lied at first about being
the Mormon rapist, and did you know she did not have to pay full
150,0o0 USD fee, reduced to just 50,000 for her, because she HELPED
OUT with publicity, according to the lab. read between the lines,
those dogs were not cloned from booger's dna, they are just normal
puppies, cute as hell, but we been had by a serial liar. i am looking
into this. it's funny, and sad. WATCH THIS STORY IMPLODE…..

Comment by danny bloom — August 12, 2008 @ 5:18 am


RNL Bio charges up to $150,000 for dog cloning but will receive just a
third of that sum from McKinney because she is the first customer and
helped with publicity, said company head Ra Jeong-chan.

****smoking gun……HELPED WITH PR.,……see!

Comment by danny bloom — August 12, 2008 @ 5:18 am


this story from Korea was in JUNE, notice the first sentence qualifier
in the photo "CLAIMED TO BE" CLONED DOGS

danny

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2008/06/133_25184.html

Three claimed-to-be clones of a family dog Missy, produced in between
December 2007 and April 2008 by Hwang Woo-suk.

Comment by danny bloom — August 12, 2008 @ 5:18 am

Posted by: danny bloom | August 12, 2008 7:48 AM

#10

What's wrong with the promotional discount for the first customer? Booger is not the first clone. In dog cloning history, there have been a lots clones since Snuppy in 2005. I think the reporter at Korea Herald was crooked and tried to hurt the company's reputation. Don't worry about genuine clone. All of clones have been proved as genuine ones so far.

Posted by: spearman | August 14, 2008 10:24 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs