Now on ScienceBlogs: The Festival Recognizes Our First "Featured Fan"!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Discovering Biology in a Digital World

My thoughts on biology, teaching, life, and exploring the living world via the digital one. Only my opinions are represented by these postings, they do not represent the viewpoints of any funding agency or Geospiza, Inc.

Profile

Sandra Porter I am a digital biologist, teacher, and entrepreneur. My passion is developing instructional materials for 21st century biology (Digital World Biology).

Search

Follow digitalbio on Twitter

National Science Foundation projects

Bio-Link Bio-Link is an Advanced Technology Education center of Excellence that works to improve biotechnology and life science education in the community colleges.

My Bio-Link blog

bio-itest bio-itest is an ITEST project (Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers). We are developing curriculum that uses bioinformatics resources to explore genetic testing and DNA barcoding.

Scenario based learning

Digital World Biology

Digital World Biology produces educational materials that help students and biologists use bioinformatics resources to explore biology. We write books, produce tutorials, sell biology-related merchandise and give workshops.

DigitalBio Favorites

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Blogroll

Science Education Groups

Keep up to date

Awards

Red Orbit






When you need to laugh

Interesting places

Locations of visitors to this page

Archives

« Revenge of the clones: the immunology movie | Main | Another cat that glows in the dark »

Hey sperm donors, could DNA testing be hazardous to your wealth?

Category: Genetics & Molecular BiologyGenomicspopulation genetics
Posted on: October 21, 2008 10:07 PM, by Sandra Porter

Maybe you did it for the extra cash. Maybe you wanted to be part of the sperm cube public art project. Whatever the reason, it's possible, just possible, your sperm took on a life of it's own, once you left it.

And now that a genome is no longer an entirely personal bit of information, you may be in for a surprise meeting someday, with the end result.

That's right.

Male adoptees are getting their DNA tested and getting information about their possible surnames.

According to the BBC news:

At least 30 men registered with US consumer genetic testing firm Family Tree DNA have found their "biological surname" in this way, the company's chief executive told BBC News. The company has an online database called Ysearch containing genetic information from 125,000 men, along with surnames and other genealogical data.

As yet, I don't think there's anything that protects a sperm donor from a lawsuit from a child, claiming to need, oh help with college expenses, or just whatever.

It might be something that you want to look into.

Hat tip to Genome Technology. More information can be found here, and here, and further discussion of the ethical implications here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

There is no provision in the law that compells a donor to provide for offspring, but even if it did, there is no provision in the law requiring parents provide a college education. SO, why would a sperm donor be required to provide one.

You CAN demonstrate with a yDNA test that you are related, but that indicates only a common paternal ancestor rather than paternity. In fact, you cannot establish a surname beyond a reasonable doubt.

Posted by: John Lloyd Scharf | October 21, 2008 11:03 PM

2

The yDNA test may not be enough to establish paternity, but there are tests that can do this with a high probability. Recently, a paper in Plos showed that DNA samples from different individuals could be identified even in a mixture where it was thought that this wouldn't happen.

As far as the question of legal responsibility: do parents have a legal responsibility to support their children? I think they probably do, but I'm not a lawyer.

I remember that Washington state used to require women to have paternity tests done before they could qualify for aid. I thought the reason was that the state would get fathers to pay before using taxpayer funds.

Posted by: Sandra Porter | October 21, 2008 11:59 PM

3

These sperm donors ought to realize that with their little drop-off specimen, that they are potentially creating a human being. That human being has a right to know her/his identity. How foolish are people to think that any human would not not want to know who their father is, regardless of how the person was conceived. If you don't want to be found by a daughter or son, then don't sell your sperm. As far as college tuitions being at the forefront of a donoree seeking her/his roots - think again - they just want to know the other half of their identity.

Posted by: Shawna | October 22, 2008 7:58 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.