Now on ScienceBlogs: Where the IPCC went wrong with its climate predictions

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Discovering Biology in a Digital World

My thoughts on biology, teaching, life, and exploring the living world via the digital one. Only my opinions are represented by these postings, they do not represent the viewpoints of any funding agency or Geospiza, Inc.

Profile

Sandra Porter I am a microbiologist and molecular biologist turned tenured biotech faculty turned bioinformatics scientist turned entrepreneur. My passion is developing instructional materials for 21st century biology (Digital World Biology).

Search

Digital World Biology

Discover Biology with Bioinformatics


Subscribe to our newsletter


e-mail digitalbio at scienceblogs.com

use 'Digital World Biology' news as the subject

DigitalBio Favorites

Science Blogs School Fundraiser


link_donorschoose_small.gif


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Blogroll

Science Education Groups

Keep up to date

Awards

Red Orbit

Digital Bio at Blogged

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences
Add Digital Bio to your Technorati Favorites!





Follow me on Twitter

When you need to laugh

Interesting places

The Tangled Bank
MicrobeWorld Radio

Locations of visitors to this page

Archives

« Corn - it's not just in your food, it's in your packaging | Main | High school students win Best New Application Award at 2008 IGEM »

The Seattle Times takes on hospital-acquired MRSA

Category: Microbiology
Posted on: November 16, 2008 2:25 PM, by Sandra Porter

mrsa_bacteria.gifHospital cases of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have risen 33-fold during the past ten years in Washington state, yet our hospitals fail to identify or track cases in a systemic fashion (Seattle Times).

The Seattle Times began a three-part investigative report today describing the rise in MRSA incidence, the consequences for patients, and the failure on the part of our hospitals to take measures to address the problem.

mrsa-cases.gif

According to the Seattle Times, six out of seven people get MRSA infections at some kind of health care facility. The spread could be contained if health care providers knew which patients carried the bacteria. But hospitals claim that the $20 per patient cost to test for MRSA would be too expensive, is unnecessary, and too burdensome.

And,

Some hospitals fear lawsuits. If they screened every patient, results would show who already had the germ upon admission -- and who picked it up while in the hospital. Patients could then blame the hospital for their infections.

Yet MRSA infections pose considerable danger to patients. Usually, skin is an effective barrier. The bacteria could live on your skin unnoticed throughout your life without causing any problems, but once it gains entry to the body, through a surgical procedure, or other kind of wound, the infection is difficult to control. Some patients in the Times story describe permanent disabilities resulting from MRSA, many others have died. According to the Times, there were at least 672 deaths from MRSA infections that were attributed to another cause.

[My note: the Times didn't specify the time period here, it's not clear if this was over the last ten years or during a shorter period.]

It's an interesting article.

Reference:
Micheal Berens and Ken Armstrong, How our hospitals unleashed a MRSA epidemic, Seattle Times, 11-16-2008

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

This is huge. I hope the Times stays on it!

Posted by: yogi-one | November 17, 2008 3:24 AM

2

Why wouldn't the hospitals just use a test that tends to report negative more often? When they go to court, just say, "Well, this test only catches 90% of MRSA infections, so they might have already had the infection coming in."

Posted by: Mike Fox | November 17, 2008 9:45 AM

3

One area often overlooked in the battle against the transfer of dangerous infectious diseases in medical environments are the ubiquitous keyboards and mice. Standard keyboards and mice can not be disinfected because germs collect around and in seams and under keys. Recently Man & Machine, Inc. released a White Paper titled, “Minimizing Transmission of Infectious Disease in Heath Care Environments by Use of Disinfectable PC Keyboards and Mice.” It can be viewed at: http://www.man-machine.com/whitepaper.htm

Posted by: Jeff Goldman | November 17, 2008 9:51 AM

4

What is truly scary is the featured hospital in the Seattle Times article, Harborview Medical Center, is a major teaching hospital for the University of Washington School of Medicine. As a former patient (and former administrator at that facility), they regularly medical staff regularly cite the current literature to patients in denying antibiotics for unnecessary conditions, but they won't perform a necessary medical test upon admission even though it is relatively cheap? That is absolutely ridiculous, especially given the cost-benefit ratio involved.

Posted by: Former Administrator | November 17, 2008 9:56 AM

5

I work with a company called activTek Environmental and we have a technology that scrubs the air and surfaces of all pathogens, including MRSA and kills it by 99.99% in 24 hours.

We are currently working with a large hospital chain to ward off this epidemic called MRSA that kills over 200,000 people per year.

If you work in a hospital, please refer to my website at www.activepure.com/valeriejolie for tests results from Kansas State University for proof of effectiveness. We are offering to put our technology in hospitals for an evaluation period at no cost to the hospital. Call my office for details.

Valerie Jolie
503-750-9143
www.activtek.net/valeriejolie

Posted by: Valerie Jolie | November 17, 2008 2:28 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM