Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Discovering Biology in a Digital World

My thoughts on biology, teaching, life, and exploring the living world via the digital one. Only my opinions are represented by these postings, they do not represent the viewpoints of any funding agency or Geospiza, Inc.

Profile

Sandra Porter I am a digital biologist, teacher, and entrepreneur. My passion is developing instructional materials for 21st century biology (Digital World Biology).

Search

Follow digitalbio on Twitter

National Science Foundation projects

Bio-Link Bio-Link is an Advanced Technology Education center of Excellence that works to improve biotechnology and life science education in the community colleges.

My Bio-Link blog

bio-itest bio-itest is an ITEST project (Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers). We are developing curriculum that uses bioinformatics resources to explore genetic testing and DNA barcoding.

Scenario based learning

Digital World Biology

Digital World Biology produces educational materials that help students and biologists use bioinformatics resources to explore biology. We write books, produce tutorials, sell biology-related merchandise and give workshops.

DigitalBio Favorites

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Blogroll

Science Education Groups

Keep up to date

Awards

Red Orbit






When you need to laugh

Interesting places

Locations of visitors to this page

Archives

« Open science, peer review and the flu | Main | BLASTing through the flu: activity 5, how similar is similar? »

Why would we be able to detect more genetic variation by blasting with nucleotide sequences?

Category: BioinformaticsGenomeInfluenza resourcesScience educationclassroom activitiessequence analysisweb resources
Posted on: April 30, 2009 11:00 PM, by Sandra Porter

We'll have a blast, I promise! But there's one little thing we need to discuss first...

I want to explain why I'm going to use nucleotide sequences for the blast search. (I used protein the other day). It's not just because someone told me too, there is a solid rational reason for this.

The reason is the redundancy in the genetic code.

Okay, that probably didn't make any sense to those of you who didn't already know the answer. Here it is.

standard genetic code.png  The picture above shows the human genetic code (there are at least 16 variations on this, but that's another story). Each middle cell in the table shows the codons. Those are the groups of three bases in the left most column. Then, reading from left to right, we have the three letter and one letter abbreviations for the amino acids they encode. In every case, except for tryptophan (W), an amino acid can be encoded by multiple codons. (That's what we mean when we say the code is redundant. Oops, I said it again!)

Well, this means that we can have the same amino acid in a protein, but different codons in the mRNA. 

So a protein sequence like this: FLAKEY

Could be encoded by the DNA sequence: TTTCTTGCCAAATAT
                               or the DNA sequenceTTCCTAGCAAAGTAC

These two sequences are only 70% identical but they code for amino acid sequences that are 100% identical.

Thus, you can see more variation at the level of the nucleotides. 

One other thing, you might be wondering why there are T's in these sequences when the virus is made of RNA.  Well, one reason is we usually make a DNA copy of RNA before we do any sequencing.  The other reason, is that we store almost all sequences in the form of a DNA sequence, even when the sequences really did come from RNA. 


Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.