Skeptic Article

The article that Burt Humburg and I wrote will be in the next issue of Skeptic, but in light of today's ruling, they decided to post it online today. You can see it here.

More like this

You're going to have an article you co-wrote in Skeptic? Man, that's so freaking cool. I'll read it online, of course. But it will be cool wicked cool to see your name in one of my favorite publications. Now if you can follow that up with an article in Skeptical Inquirer and top it all off with another in Fangoria, you'll be as a god to me.

By chrisberez (not verified) on 20 Dec 2005 #permalink

"With that phylogenetic relationship clearly established in the trial, the judge evidently decided that creationism had not mutated enough to survive as the new species of Intelligent Design."

Heh. Good one.

By Iron Teakettle (not verified) on 20 Dec 2005 #permalink

This is so far down on the main page, but Ed: I wanted to compliment you and Mr. Humburg on the article. It is always more interesting to read legal drama written from the viewpoint of a non-lawyer than a lawyer. Your synopsis was just excellent, and more to the point, captured what the case was really about in a very cogent, accessible way.

Thank you.

By Doctor_Gonzo (not verified) on 21 Dec 2005 #permalink