Here’s another example of the Worldnutdaily’s dishonest headlines: 17-year-old challenges Pledge of Allegiance. It’s a link to an article in a Florida newspaper about a student who has filed suit, represented by the ACLU, against a school that punished him for not standing for the pledge of allegiance. He’s not challenging the pledge, as Michael Newdow did, he’s challenging the authority of the school to punish him for not participating. That issue, by the way, was decided more than half a century ago in the Barnette decision which ruled that schools could not force a student to recite the pledge. Isn’t it interesting how the WND’s headlines are always slanted toward the most inaccurate interpretation of the actual article?