Now on ScienceBlogs: "Investigative science journalism" and books I like to read [All of My Faults Are Stress Related]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Scooter Libby Bombshell | Main | Funniest Picture Ever? »

Deutsche's Amusing Interview

Category: Politics
Posted on: February 10, 2006 9:34 AM, by Ed Brayton

You can hear an interview with George Deutsche, the boy wonder who just resigned from NASA because he lied on his resume about having graduated from Texas A&M, here. It's pretty funny stuff. I especially like his defense of having lied on his resume.

Host: Was it public, I mean, it was pretty much known when you were at the Bush campaign, when you were working for the Bush campaign, that you had left school to come work for the Bush campaign.

Deutsche: It was known that I, uh, was an undergrad when I was with the Bush campaign. It was known that I was an undergrad when I worked for the inaugural committee. When NASA hired me, they knew that I was an undergrad. The only real, uh, the only room here for misinterpretation could be my resume. And I, you know, if there, if my resume is misleading, I take responsibility for that, no question, I do. Um, and I didn't never mean for that to happen. But I have never ever lied about my status, I have never tried to misrepresent that to anyone. If my resume was misleading, I take, I take responsibility, but that's not it, it's not about my resume. It's about this larger issue, it's about the agenda of global warming, and how these people are willing to resort to smearing a 24 year old junior appointee in an effort to just get one step ahead in their agenda, to get a little bit more face time in the media.

He then goes on to claim that he resigned on his own not because of the lies on his resume but because "I was being smeared, my integrity and credibility were being questioned, and as a human being, as a human being, I just could not take it anymore." On how many levels could this be idiotic at the same time?

First of all, you've gotta love the rationalization that yes, he did falsify his resume and he "takes responsibility" for that, but he "never ever tried to misrepresent that to anyone". I mean, unless you count the resume. Apparently this is the reverse of the old maxim that an oral contract isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Sure, he wrote a resume that claimed he had graduated when he didn't, but he didn't try to misrepresent the reality that he hadn't graduated.

Second of all, the revelation that he had lied on his resume didn't come from those evil global warming scientists with an agenda, it came from Nick Anthis, a Texas A&M graduate now at Oxford on a Rhodes scholarship studying biochemistry. And George, I've got news for you. If you lied on your resume - and you did - then pointing out that you lied on your resume is not a "smear" and your integrity and credibility should be questioned. You weren't smeared, you were caught in a lie.

TrackBacks

  • Goliath does fall. from courtney hodges | hodgeslab.org
    Goliath does fall. Last week, the New York Times and the Washington Post reported that James Hansen, a senior scientist at NASA, had been stifled in his attempts to report recent climate changes. Well, it turned out that a 24-year-old... Read More
    Tracked on February 10, 2006 12:55 PM

Comments

1
The only real, uh, the only room here for misinterpretation could be my resume.

I love the word misinterpretation. I mean, just because you claim something on your resume doesn't automatically mean that's what you claim. That's only one possible interpretation.

And one has to wonder how this "24 year old junior appointee" with no apparent background whatsoever can know the first thing about the science behind global warming.

The best part is when he accuses those opposed to him of playing partisan politics. Luckily I own the Mega 10000 version of the Irony Meter, or it would have busted wide open.

Posted by: Dave S. Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 9:48 AM

2

Most people in the real world would think that altering a SCIENCE agency's output in the areas of SCIENCE where that agency is expert in the name of RELIGION would also harm one's integrity and credibility.

Of course, we all know that our young ideologues don't live in the real world....

Posted by: Roger Tang Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 10:24 AM

3

Who knows, maybe George will appear on the Letterman show to explain his tax returns.

Posted by: mark Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 1:18 PM

4

I find it interesting that he seems to feel that noticing that his credentials are falsified is "smearing", but claiming that

these people are willing to resort to smearing a 24 year old junior appointee in an effort to just get one step ahead in their agenda, to get a little bit more face time in the media.

appears to not bother him at all. And just who are "these people"? People who read resumes? Scientists in general? Someone needs to install a new cognative dissonance meter in this guy...

Posted by: Anuminous Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 1:41 PM

5

"Someone needs to install a new cognative dissonance meter in this guy..."

You misspelled "conscience".

My stock phrase for these situations is, "He has degaussed his moral compass." Feel free to pass it on.

Posted by: Wesley R. Elsberry Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 2:28 PM

6
You misspelled "conscience".

My stock phrase for these situations is, "He has degaussed his moral compass." Feel free to pass it on.

Nice one, I will have to remember that. But even with a conscience, you would think that a person of sufficient intelligence to get into university would spot the inherent irony in the attack he made. Well, maybe "think" is the wrong word -- hope, maybe?

Posted by: Anuminous Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 2:39 PM

7
"When I left college," he said, "I did not properly update my resume. As a result, it may appear misleading to some.
So he didn't update his resume? Someone explain to me how that works. Is he going backward through time or something?

Posted by: Ian B Gibson Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 3:26 PM

8

Ian-

Where did you get that quote from? That's perfect.

Posted by: Ed Brayton Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 3:49 PM

9

I saw it on the Bad Astronomer's Blog:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/

Posted by: KeithB Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 3:54 PM

10

When NASA hired me, they knew that I was an undergrad.

These seems to be a bit of disingenuous spinning as well. He was according to even his own admission an "appointee" and thus would not have been "hired" by NASA, but rather assigned by the White House (who appointed him) to the post. Who at NASA knew he had not graduated?? It is highly unlikely that various NASA management and administration knew much more about him than what was in his resume, (that had to have been updated btw, if it said he was a graduate).

This doesn't begin to question his own claim of "junior" status whilst he seemed to feel perfectly comfortable controlling the speech of the Director of the Goddard Center as well as various publications from other NASA administrators.

Posted by: spyder Author Profile Page | February 10, 2006 5:31 PM

11

You must realise that the notion that resumes should reflect actual qualifications is based on metaphysical and unprovable assumptions. These assumptions are never questioned simply because the support the current paradigm and political correctness. The resume issue has two sides, and it is vital to present both sides to the public, or we will be doing them a disservice.

How's that for a defence of lying in yor resume?

Posted by: Staffan S Author Profile Page | February 11, 2006 12:41 PM

12

Staffan-

Freaking brilliant.

Posted by: Ed Brayton Author Profile Page | February 11, 2006 2:01 PM

13

spyder says:

It is highly unlikely that various NASA management and administration knew much more about him than what was in his resume, (that had to have been updated btw, if it said he was a graduate).

You're forgetting that George inhabits the backwards universe.

He had already written in his resume that he had graduated, while he was still a student. He was then in such a rush to join the Bush/Cheney campaign that he quit school, without graduating. When he says he forgot to update it, he meant he forgot to take out that blatant lie.

Which was a lie the second he wrote it, regardless what NASA later knew or did not know.

Posted by: Dave S. Author Profile Page | February 11, 2006 3:04 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM