This post by Radley Balko is a must read about drug war. Not only is it a massive failure, it's costing us untold billions of dollars and destroying countless lives. The numbers are staggering. 55% of all Federal prison inmates are there on drug charges, their number quadrupling between 1986 and 1999, and half of those are there solely on possession, not trafficking. And that's not including state prisons, with a much higher population and about the same percentages. There are more non-violent offenders in prison today than the populations of Alaska and Wyoming combined, at a cost of tens of thousands of dollars per year to warehouse them. But despite this massive increase in incarceration, the government's own data shows that recreational drug use has increased over that same time. Drug use will never, ever stop. It is as old as humanity itself. And it's about time we treated addiction as a health problem, not a felony.
Dispatches from the Culture Wars
Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture
Profile
Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)
Search
Recent Comments
- DingoJack on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- DingoJack on Our Mere Existence is Offensive
- Sadie Morrison on Dumbass Quote of the Day
- Milesius on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- tom van dyke on Van Dyke's Definition of "Good Faith"
- jane doe on USCIRF Blasts Defamation of Religion Resolutions
- Milesius on Our Mere Existence is Offensive
- DingoJack on Our Mere Existence is Offensive
- DingoJack on 52% of Republicans Think Obama Not Really Elected
- Leni on Our Mere Existence is Offensive
Recent Posts
- Van Dyke's Definition of "Good Faith"
- Bush DOJ Officials Defend KSM Civilian Trial
- Dumbass Quote of the Day
- Our Mere Existence is Offensive
- New Church/State Lawsuit in Tennessee
- Conservative Originalism and Interracial Marriage
- The Kirk Cameron Action Kit
- Right Wing Rap: Just Stop. Please.
- Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- Cert Denied in Religious Graduation Speech Case
Blogroll
Science Blogs
- The Panda's Thumb
- Carl Zimmer
- The Austringer
- Evolution Blog
- De Rerum Natura
- Evolving Thoughts
- Preposterous Universe
- Butterflies and Wheels
- John Lynch
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- NCSE's Legal Blog
- Red State Rabble
- Thoughts From Kansas
- Appellate Blog
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Jack Balkin
- Legal Theory Blog
- ACS Blog
- Reason and Liberty
- Overlawyered
- Supreme Court Times
- Positive Liberty
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Andrew Sullivan
- Talking Points Memo
- Daily Kos
- Media Matters
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Classical Values
- Virginia Postrel
- Jim Anderson
- Strange Doctrines
- John Scalzi
- The Pryhills
- Temperantia
- Rev. Spork
- Electric Commentary
- Two Aarons
- Farkleberries
- Paul Phillips
- Henry Neufeld
- Talk.Origins
- Talk.Reason
- Antievolution.org
- National Center for Science Education
- Talk.Design
- Michigan Citizens for Science
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
Other Information
Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb
Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.
Ed's Audio and Video
Declaring Independence podcast feed
YearlyKos 2007
Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement
Audio of Greg Raymer Interview
E-mail Policy
Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.
My Ecosystem Details
« Televangelist Fraud | Main | Rowe on Dembski and the Founders »
Balko on the Drug War
Posted on: May 24, 2006 9:11 AM, by Ed Brayton
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More




Comments
Our war on drugs is also responsible for the formation and development of the drug cartels of South America that rival governments in their wealth and power.
Posted by: Mark Paris
| May 24, 2006 9:22 AM
I heard someone say that prisoners now outnumber farmers in the US.
Posted by: Raging Bee
| May 24, 2006 9:26 AM
I heard someone say that prisoners now outnumber farmers in the US.
Start jailing the Farmers!!! It will bring the drug arrests in to a happy medium!!
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
| May 24, 2006 10:13 AM
I agree completely. I think drug use is a personal choice just as smoking and drinking are. There is one very major caveat to that however - your right to consume intoxicating substances ends at the point that you are impinging on other's rights. The perfect example is drinking and driving. You do have a right to drink but, you do NOT have a right to drink and drive. Likewise with smoking, you have a right to smoke in your own air but you do NOT have a right to pollute the air of others with your smoke. The same can be said for any other types of drugs - so long as you are not infringing on other's rights, you should have the right to take recreational drugs.
Now, with that said, there are some genuinely dangerous drugs that will physically addict you very powerfully and can and will kill you with only a bit of an overdose. I personally think one is a fool if they take such drugs but, hey, more air for me as far as I am concerned.
To that end, I do think that recreational drugs should be carefully regulated and monitored - some very strictly in the case of the really dangerous ones. I also think that ALL pertinent information about the very real dangers of some of these drugs would need to be heavily publicized to make sure the public is well informed about what they are choosing to put into their bodies.
The benefits?
We would, over night, simultaneously halve the prison population and put the very dangerous and violent drug cartels out of business. We would effectively shut down a whole black market from the street pusher on up to the drug cartel leaders.
We would open up a whole new revenue stream for the government in the form of taxes.
We would greatly lessen the burden on law enforcement so that they could concentrate on real crime such as rape, murder, assault, etc.
We would save billions of dollars on wasted "War on Drugs" efforts and wasted law enforcement efforts.
Posted by: VisualFX
| May 24, 2006 1:25 PM
We would save billions of dollars on wasted "War on Drugs" efforts and wasted law enforcement efforts.
Police departments make millions a piece through property forfeiture. That's what keeps this "war" going more than anything.
Posted by: beervolcano
| May 24, 2006 4:24 PM
Plus, a new study demonstrates that marijuana isn't isn't even that bad for you anyways. Clearly, drug policy is another area where we would all benefit from lawmakers basing their decisions to a greater extent on sound science.
Posted by: Nick Anthis
| May 24, 2006 7:08 PM
Marijuana is not only not that bad for you, it is not even itself the subject matter of a prohibitionary law. Nope. No law has been passed stating that Marijuana is illegal. The decision to make its possession an offence is a purely non-elected behind closed doors burocratic one of mandating, without oversight or being required to produce any actual, like, 'evidence', that it is a member of Schedule 1 drugs. The only law there is simply prohibits Schedule 1 and makes no mention of what drugs should be there or what justification there should be for putting them there beyond "no medical value". Apparently our leaders do not believe there is such a thing as "recreational value". Or "Personal Responsibility".
Lately they are also trying to conflate "aiding the Terrorists" in that they believe drug money flows that way. Well, maybe it does, but its for sure there is no such relationship for a person growing their own plant or two - indeed there is an anti-relationship. But these no-money 'offenders' get worse treatment than simple possession of bought drugs that might indeed have meant some cash went abroad.
Want a full blown rant? just ask. Tough to stop this short.
Posted by: lanwolf
| May 24, 2006 9:39 PM