Did Adolf Hitler say it, or did Ann Coulter say it? How many can you get right? I got 9 out of 14 right.
Dispatches from the Culture Wars
Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture
Profile
Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)
Search
Recent Comments
- Christophe Thill on Dumbass Quote of the Day
- Richard Eis on Dumbass Quote of the Day
- shawn wilkinson on Palin's Resignation
- Richard Eis on Turkey Doesn't Get Reality TV
- Richard Eis on New Professionalism in Prince George's County, Maryland
- Terry Walsh on A New Record!
- Hyuga on New Professionalism in Prince George's County, Maryland
- DingoJack on Dumbass Quote of the Day
- Azkyroth on New Professionalism in Prince George's County, Maryland
- Azkyroth on New Professionalism in Prince George's County, Maryland
Recent Posts
- Another Crazy Poker Hand
- The Award For Most Uncomfortable 4th of July Holiday Goes To...
- New Professionalism in Prince George's County, Maryland
- Kozinski Issues Unnecessary Apology
- Palin's Resignation
- A New Record!
- Turkey Doesn't Get Reality TV
- Dumbass Quote of the Day
- Bachmann: Wrong Again
- Why Fundies Love Palin
Blogroll
Science Blogs
- The Panda's Thumb
- Carl Zimmer
- The Austringer
- Evolution Blog
- De Rerum Natura
- Evolving Thoughts
- Preposterous Universe
- Butterflies and Wheels
- John Lynch
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- NCSE's Legal Blog
- Red State Rabble
- Thoughts From Kansas
- Appellate Blog
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Jack Balkin
- Legal Theory Blog
- ACS Blog
- Reason and Liberty
- Overlawyered
- Supreme Court Times
- Positive Liberty
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Andrew Sullivan
- Talking Points Memo
- Daily Kos
- Media Matters
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Classical Values
- Virginia Postrel
- Jim Anderson
- Strange Doctrines
- John Scalzi
- The Pryhills
- Temperantia
- Rev. Spork
- Electric Commentary
- Two Aarons
- Farkleberries
- Paul Phillips
- Henry Neufeld
- Talk.Origins
- Talk.Reason
- Antievolution.org
- National Center for Science Education
- Talk.Design
- Michigan Citizens for Science
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
Other Information
Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb
Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.
Ed's Audio and Video
Declaring Independence podcast feed
YearlyKos 2007
Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement
Audio of Greg Raymer Interview
E-mail Policy
Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.
My Ecosystem Details
« Bush Desecrates the American Flag? | Main | Isiah Replaces Larry Brown »
Hitler vs Coulter Quiz
Category: Politics
Posted on: June 22, 2006 9:55 AM, by Ed Brayton
Comments
I got a 10!
Mainly though it was because frankly, Hitler writes better.
Posted by: Dave S.
| June 22, 2006 10:12 AM
Wow! That was harder than the Multistate Bar Exam. 10 out of 14.
Posted by: Dan
| June 22, 2006 10:17 AM
I got a 10 too, largely (as Dave S. said) by the way the sentences were structured and a few by historical references that postdate Hitler.
Scary how close they all are though.
Posted by: Jeff Hebert
| June 22, 2006 10:19 AM
13. I wrongly attributed one to Hitler.
Posted by: Jeff Chamberlain
| June 22, 2006 10:25 AM
I got 12 of a possible 14. I made exactly the same observation as Dave when we were discussing this at TheologyWeb. Hitler writes better.
Posted by: Sylas
| June 22, 2006 10:27 AM
Liberal conspiracy! I only got 6 right! I thought they were all Hitler.
Posted by: J-Dog
| June 22, 2006 10:30 AM
10. As if it's meaningful to distinguish between the two for most purposes.
However, Hitler's quotes were changed for this test, substituting some of Hitler's pro-Aryan and anti-Semitic language with the words, "America", "Democrat", "liberal", and "the liberal media" to make the Coulter quotes a little more difficult to spot.
Discussed on FreeRepublic back in March.
Posted by: Ted
| June 22, 2006 10:48 AM
Ted -
It did strike me as a bit odd that Hitler apparently used so many Americanisms. Especially the word "liberal", which outside the U.S. is a fairly innocuous political descriptor and not a synonym for "cocksucker".
Posted by: Dave S.
| June 22, 2006 10:54 AM
Sylas says:
Better, but still god-awful. And Hitler had help, at least as far as his unreadably ponderous epic Mein Kampf goes.
Posted by: Dave S.
| June 22, 2006 11:01 AM
I got 10 because I didn't realise that Hitler would complain about "Liberals" attacking America. Otherwise I may have got 11, but that test was really hard actually.
They are quite difficult to tell apart and that really scares me.
Posted by: J O'Donnell
| June 22, 2006 11:16 AM
I got 10, but as was mentioned above, it was becuase Hitler writes better.
Posted by: Mike
| June 22, 2006 11:27 AM
13 out of 14! But I think it says something that Hitler had a far better command of prose than Coulter ever will.
Posted by: ThomasHobbes934
| June 22, 2006 12:00 PM
12/14. I agree that Hitler is stylistically superior to Coulter. One of the two that I missed is perplexing to me:
1) "Hence it is that at the..."
=this is in talking about liberals in America causing destruction in America, as if it's a bad thing, which doesn't seem something Hitler would've been troubled with???
Oh well.
Posted by: sdanielmorgan
| June 22, 2006 12:06 PM
I also got ten - but nit because Hitler wrote better, it was because Hitler had better writers to do it for him. Though as Dave wrote it is still bad writing. Though to credit Hitlers speech writers it was probably quite motivational, in a sick and twisted fashion, with ol' Hitler up there in front of thousands whohave been marching through the streets with torches. Then their "great leader" gets up and spews that rubbish, a lot of "power" words in his quotes.
Posted by: Treban
| June 22, 2006 12:07 PM
13 out of 14 correct. Though it didn't take me long to figure out they had substited "liberal" for "Jew" in Hitler's quotes. It was fairly easy because, Hitler's word usage and sentence construction are a little archaic. But the test served its purpose. The content and the totalitarian intent behind the content are identical.
Posted by: Susan Brassfield Cogan
| June 22, 2006 1:11 PM
I got a 12 out of 14. Primarily because, like Susan Brassfield Cogan says above, that Hitler's style is more archaic, wheras Mr. Coulter writes with all the intellectual force of a 15 year old American boy.
Posted by: Leni
| June 22, 2006 1:47 PM
12 out of 14. I agree that Hitler's archaic style was a pretty good clue. I continue to be amazed that people in this country actually think Coulter contributes to the cause of freedom and defends founding American ideals, mind-boggling.
Posted by: Mike Heath
| June 22, 2006 3:06 PM
The problem is that Hitler didn't say those specific things and that's a pretty big detail.
So comparing Coulter to Imaginary-Hitler is a bit disingenuous; sure, it's fun, but fundamentally not much different from the right-wingers that put words into other's mouths in order to make them sound silly or stupid for the amusement of their echo chamber. On any given day read StopTheACLU or FreeRepublic and you see this type of thing.
I don't think inventing things to compare Coulter is necessary. Her body of work and brand of fascism stands on its own.
Posted by: Ted
| June 22, 2006 3:57 PM
11.
But wait a minute! Didn't foremost political authority Mr. Gribbit say just a few days ago that Hitler and the Nazis were leftists?
Posted by: Capt. Rational
| June 22, 2006 4:27 PM
12 for me too, and for exactly the same reason.
Posted by: WJD
| June 22, 2006 5:42 PM
I took this a couple of weeks ago using the stylistic criterion, and did 13 out of 14.
Posted by: Pieter B
| June 22, 2006 6:12 PM
Perhaps it's time to invoke Godwin's Law? Ah heck, I couldn't resist. I got 11 of them right.
Posted by: Jim Babka
| June 23, 2006 1:49 AM
For the fun of it, I put Coulter for all of them. All of the sudden my phone rang. It was a pre-recorded message from Bill O'Reilly, apparently Fox Security will be visiting me to discuss my "recent actions?"
Posted by: dogmeatIB
| June 23, 2006 2:33 AM
14 of 14,
But I realized that all of the older quotes used "liberal" (and I think a single case of the possesive plural, "liberal's"), while the newer quotes always referred to "liberals".
The older quotes used 'liberal' as a description of a class of people, the newer quotes used 'liberals' as a class of people needing no description.
Cheers,
-Flex
Posted by: Flex
| June 23, 2006 8:31 AM
11 out of 14 correct (I might've done better, but it was hard to click and goose-step at the same time).
Nifty experiment: have Coulter back on Leno live to take this test. I'd like to see if she's able to identify the garbage she allegedly creates.
Posted by: tminuspi
| June 26, 2006 9:49 AM