This is classic. Thanks to Jon Rowe and 386sx for pointing out this video of John Lofton debating Frank Zappa on Crossfire in 1986. Lofton calls for government censorship of rock music. His arguments are ridiculous. He claims that it's okay to censor music because "words mean something" and "have impact." He claims that America suddenly had an "incest problem" in the 20 years before that because it was mentioned in songs. What songs? You got me. He makes a total fool of himself, with Zappa's help.
Profile
Ed Brayton is a freelance writer and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media.(static)
Search This Blog
Recent Comments
- Thomas B. on Bush Edits Out Jefferson's Religious Views
- Jonathan Vos Post on Bush Edits Out Jefferson's Religious Views
- lilricky on Bush Edits Out Jefferson's Religious Views
- James Hanley on Another Lying Cop
- kynefski on Bush Edits Out Jefferson's Religious Views
- chad on Bush Edits Out Jefferson's Religious Views
- Michael Heath on Nailing Bill O'Reilly
- Mr. Upright on Nailing Bill O'Reilly
- Rod on Nailing Bill O'Reilly
- j a higginbotham on Comer Files Suit in Texas
Recent Posts
- Tax Cuts Help Porn Industry
- Nailing Bill O'Reilly
- Comer Files Suit in Texas
- Another Lying Cop
- Dueling Bible Theme Parks
- Bush Edits Out Jefferson's Religious Views
- Goodbye Jesse Helms
- Only Christians Pray
- Visiting for the Weekend
- Those Fiscally Responsible Republicans
Blogroll
Science Blogs
- The Panda's Thumb
- Carl Zimmer
- The Austringer
- Evolution Blog
- De Rerum Natura
- Evolving Thoughts
- Preposterous Universe
- Butterflies and Wheels
- John Lynch
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- NCSE's Legal Blog
- Red State Rabble
- Thoughts From Kansas
- Appellate Blog
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Jack Balkin
- Legal Theory Blog
- ACS Blog
- Reason and Liberty
- Overlawyered
- Supreme Court Times
- Positive Liberty
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Andrew Sullivan
- Talking Points Memo
- Daily Kos
- Media Matters
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Classical Values
- Virginia Postrel
- Jim Anderson
- Strange Doctrines
- John Scalzi
- The Pryhills
- Temperantia
- Rev. Spork
- Electric Commentary
- Two Aarons
- Farkleberries
- Paul Phillips
- Henry Neufeld
- Talk.Origins
- Talk.Reason
- Antievolution.org
- National Center for Science Education
- Talk.Design
- Michigan Citizens for Science
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
Other Information
Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb
Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Pilot Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.
Ed's Audio and Video
YearlyKos 2007
Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement
Audio of Greg Raymer Interview
E-mail Policy
Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.
My Ecosystem Details
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Olbermann on O'Reilly and Ratings | Main | Ron Wyatt: Collosal Fraud »
Lofton v Zappa
Category: Liberty
Posted on: June 30, 2006 10:19 AM, by Ed Brayton



Comments
I wonder if Tipper Gore had not been so active in promoting censorhip in the 80s and 90s, if a few more civil libertarians might have been more excited about supporting her husband in the 2000 presidential elections?
Posted by: Russell
|
June 30, 2006 10:46 AM
That is one of the reasons I wouldn't vote for Gore.
Posted by: Dexceus
|
June 30, 2006 11:23 AM
Wow, John Lofton is an idiot. Near the end of the clip he says "...we've got kids who don't know the meaning of life, and you're going to tell them to register to vote?"
I sure as hell don't know the "meaning" of life. Does anyone?
Mr. Zappa spoke on how he feared that the United States was moving towards a fascist theocracy. I think his fears were very well grounded, but today the threat is even greater.
Posted by: CaptainMike
|
June 30, 2006 12:15 PM
Just to repeat and expand on my comment from the Lofton post, since it's more relevant here...
I was amazed by the Crossfire video. And really, it demonstrates the moral bankruptcy of Lofton's viewpoint. Zappa obviously recognizes that the cure for offensive speech isn't banning the speech, but speaking out against it, and that it's precisely the speech with the least appeal that needs the most protection. I wish he'd pointed out that if Lofton had his way, Zappa could call for the prohibition of advocacy of censorship on the grounds that he finds censorship abhorrent! (As do I.)
"Do you really think that the founding fathers had this sort of filth in mind?" Hell, yes! And if they didn't, they should have.
"Words have meaning," indeed. And the meaning of Lofton's words is that Americans can't be trusted to think for themselves, that they require some benevolent nanny making sure they aren't exposed to Bad Ideas. Faugh.
Also, 5000 quatloo fine to Lofton for the Godwin violation. Hey, John, in Nazi Germany, it wasn't the Jews burning the books!
If Frank was afraid we were heading toward a fascist theocracy in 1986, he must be spinning now...
Posted by: Squiddhartha
|
June 30, 2006 12:15 PM
To pull the headline quote from Zappa off my blog..
Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say that there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.
And lofton demonstrates this here and elseware.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
June 30, 2006 1:03 PM
What, you mean I have the last extant 8-track of "Incest hits of the 60s and 70s"? That ought to be worth a fortune on eBay.
It is pretty clear, though, that pop songs of the era were obsessed with statutory rape-- That sappy one that goes "you're much too young girl" or, even more direct: "She was just seventeen. You know what I mean."
Posted by: PaulC
|
June 30, 2006 1:25 PM
How about the closing song on Live Bullet. There was nothing wrong with that song at all back when I was 18, but I was listening to the live version of "Let it Rock" the other day and got just a twinge uncomfortable at enjoying the song when this nostalgic bit came around...
Little Ol' Chuck Berry
Chuck used to say,
"There she is again, over there,
By the record machine."
Three times.
Looking like a model on the cover of a magazine,
Too damn cute to be a minute over thirteen.
I believe that.
Meeeeeeanwhile....Ol' Chuck, he'd be thinking,
"She's in the mood,
No need to break it,
I got a chance and lord,
I'm gonna take it.
If she'll dance we might even make it.
Come on Queenie! Lets shake it!"
Little Queenie. Go, Go, Go, Little Queenie.
Rock n' Roll, Rock n'Roll, Rock n' Roll, little queenie
Go, Go, Go, Little Queenie.
Go, Go, Go, Little Queenie.
Rock n'Roll, Rock n' Roll, little queenie
That's still a rockin' good album though.
Posted by: Ted
|
June 30, 2006 3:09 PM
Ted-
You just happened to bring up what I consider to be the greatest album of the rock era.
Posted by: Ed Brayton
|
June 30, 2006 3:19 PM
Is that Bog Seger?
And now I love Zappa. I knew he did this, but I had never listen to him talk about it. I really don't see how Lofton was even thinking... It's as if he took every bad argument there is and used it.
Posted by: Kele
|
June 30, 2006 3:59 PM
Good night, good night, and get high and have a good time...Thank YOU. (Closing line from Live Bullet).
People don't appreciate Bob Seger because they figure him for the Chevy commercials, but the man could rock back in the day. If you haven't heard Live Bullet, get a hold of it and crank it up high. It's just fun to hear people enjoying themselves playing music.
Used to be that you couldn't walk into a blue collar bar after work and not hear Bob Seger and Live Bullet on the juke. Some midwesterners prefer Nugent, but he's more headbanger than Seger. Seger is textbook 70s American rock that workingman just gets. Hence the Chevy appeal.
Posted by: Ted
|
June 30, 2006 4:27 PM
"I'm a conservative." - Frank Zappa
Gods he was great. That was just way to much fun. I didn't realize he was quite that much of a libertarian though. My computer was making it hard to watch so I missed the end but I definately got the impression he has a strong libertarian bent.
Posted by: Treban
|
June 30, 2006 5:18 PM
Ted-
I couldn't agree more about Seger. Live Bullet was the album growing up. My 71 year old father and I might be the only father and son to share a favorite album, but when I was growing up that album was just on constantly. I know every scratch on it. He had a lot of hits on other albums for a long time, but that one live concert from Cobo Hall will never be topped.
Posted by: Ed Brayton
|
June 30, 2006 5:40 PM
Lordy, I miss Frank.
I liked Bob Seger circa-"Rambling Gambling Man," but his "Like a Rock" era didn't do it for me so much. And as much as I disagree with Ted Nugent's politics, I greatly enjoy some of his music, like "Stranglehold."
Posted by: Sexy Sadie
|
June 30, 2006 7:32 PM
At the time, the song "Sister" by Prince caused some controversy because it was about incest.
Posted by: Ben
|
July 1, 2006 1:02 AM
What? You've never heard of The Incest Song?
Posted by: Skemono
|
July 1, 2006 1:41 AM
Did anyone else notice how much Zappa looks like Groucho Marx?
Posted by: Sylas
|
July 1, 2006 5:58 AM
Ted wrote:
Some people maybe. I don't appreciate him because I have this association with Tom Cruise in his underwear singing that loathesome Rock n Roll song, and I find Tom Cruise only slightly more vile than that song.
Plus there is just something about the man's voice. It's intolerable. Unbearable. And thinking of that voice singing about 13 year old girls is beyond vile. It's unspeakably disgusting and creepy!
LOL. Sorry...It's just that whenever I hear Bob Segar's name I just have to clench my fists and "Gyaaaach!!". For some reason the man just gets to me in this skin-crawling, vomit-choking way. Always has.
Then again- I am a child of 80's new wave and punk. He is the antithesis of all that *is* good ;)
Posted by: Leni
|
July 1, 2006 9:53 AM
For those of you who just can't get your fill of John Lofton, here's more (from The Daily Show).
I'll say this: Lofton's hair looks a lot better than it did 20 years ago.
Posted by: MisterDNA
|
July 1, 2006 3:17 PM
I'm so old, I've seen Bob Seger without paying a cover charge. Three times.
On a long and lonesome highway East of Omaha . . .
Posted by: Pieter B
|
July 1, 2006 4:48 PM
80s Punk trash, huh? Can I recommend Hammell On Trial -- Songs For Parents Who Enjoy Drugs? A slightly manic version of Tom Waites with the 80s shallowness worn as a badge of pride. Check out songs number one (Inquiring Minds) and seven (Values).
Posted by: Ted
|
July 4, 2006 8:53 AM
Ted wrote:
LOL. That guy is a serious freak. I sampled some of the songs on Itunes and they're funny, but not quite spastic enough for me. Thanks though :) Great album title.
I don't know about the Tom Waits comparison though. There's no piano, no drunken sentimentality. I'd have compared to the Violent Femmes meets Frank Zappa. He's got Franks goofy rambling thing but it sounds kinda like the Violent Femmes, who also wear their shallowness as a badge of pride.
Posted by: Leni
|
July 7, 2006 1:19 PM
Interesting clip. I was only 5 when that aired.
By the way...John Lofton is still defending Christianity and Zappa is dead!
Christ haters like Zappa come and go, but God's Word will stand forever!
Posted by: Dale | July 20, 2006 2:41 PM
By the way, in the time it took to complete that debate Zappa released 3 albums.
Posted by: Matthew | July 20, 2006 3:01 PM
Let's be clear about something: Tipper Gore did not promote censorship.
Censorship is when the government passes laws designed to curb free speech. Tipper Gore did not do that.
What she did was try to convince retail stores to voluntarily pull certain bands from their shelves. That's called boycotting and is the proper way to protest something in a capitalistic society.
Posted by: Johnny O | July 14, 2007 12:25 PM
Leni, in this regard we are soul mates. Can't stand the man's voice. He must gargle with the same mouthwash Michael Bolton uses.
Posted by: grasshopper | July 15, 2007 7:21 AM
The link is broken. Try http://youtube.com/watch?v=8ISil7IHzxc
Posted by: Giles | July 16, 2007 2:50 PM