Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of 
And out come the wingnuts. Here's the email I just received from someone named James Albright:
Dear Ed,Noah's ark was discovered by Ron Wyatt, whose ministry is named Wyatt Archeological Research. The news media is only taking attention away from the real ark through your ministry. Please stop this approach in the name of Jesus. Thank you.
Bro. James D Albright
Oi vey. Are there people out there who still take Ron Wyatt seriously? Con men simply don't get much more transparent than this guy. Wyatt was a nurse anesthetist (now deceased) who claimed not only to have found Noah's Ark, but to have found virtually everything in Biblical archaeology that might be important to Christians - Noah's Ark, the exact place where the Red Sea was parted to allow the Israelites to escape Egypt, the true location of Mt. Sinai, the Ark of the Covenant and, most ridiculously, the actual blood of Jesus Christ!
This last one is the most amusing of them all. He claims to have found the Ark of the Covenant in Jerusalem in a secret cave under the actual spot where Christ was crucified, and it had Jesus' blood all over it (the blood had dripped down from the cross).
Whilst in the chamber, Ron noticed a dried, black substance in an earthquake crack in the roof, above the Ark of the Covenant. He noticed that this black substance was also on the lid of the cracked stone casing. Obviously, this substance had dripped from the crack in the roof, and provision had been made for it to land on the Ark of the Covenant, as the stone lid had been cracked and moved aside. Ron wondered what substance could be so sacred, that God made provision for it to land on the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant. He remembered the earthquake crack at the foot of the cross hole, and suddenly an awesome realization as to what had happened, came over him. Ron traced the earthquake crack, and indeed it was the same crack as the one at the cross hole. The dried black substance in the crack was tested and proved to be blood, apparently the blood of Jesus Christ. The Bible says that when Jesus died there was an earthquake and the rocks were rent (Matt. 27:51). A Roman soldier speared Christ in His side in order to make sure He was dead, and blood and water poured out (John 19:34). Ron discovered that this same blood and water poured down through the earthquake crack and fell upon the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant.
Since the blood was dried, he had it rehydrated and then, allegedly, had it tested (where are those tests? No one seems to know - surprise, surprise). And here's the result:
Human cells normally have 46 chromosomes. These are actually 23 pairs of homologous chromosomes. In each pair of chromosomes, one of the pair is from the mother and the other member is from the father. Therefore, 23 chromosomes come from the mother and 23 from the father. In each set of 23, 22 chromosomes are autosomal and one is sex-determining. The sex-determining ones are the X chromosome and the Y chromosome. Females are XX, so they can only contribute an X chromosome to their offspring, whereas males are XY, which allows them to contribute either an X or a Y. If they contribute an X, the child is female, whereas if they contribute a Y, the child is male. The fascinating finding in this blood was that instead of 46 chromosomes, there were only 24. There were 22 autosomal chromosomes, one X chromosome and one Y chromosome. This evidences that the person to whom this blood belonged to had a mother but no human father, because the normal contribution of paternal chromosomes is missing.
You really can't write comedy like this. Needless to say, he brags of all these fantastic scientific tests that never see the light of day - but trust him, he's got em! His assistant, Jim Pinkoski, is quite an amusing fellow. He'll show you a piece of genuine petrified wood from Noah's Ark. And when you point out that this "petrified wood" has no rings in it, he'll tell you - with a straight face - that that's because trees didn't have rings before the flood. It's all quite amusing and ridiculous.
Wyatt is so bad that other creationist and Christian groups have put up webpages debunking his work. Here are three major ones: Tentmaker, Christian Information Ministries and Answers in Genesis.
Comments
Ed has a ministry? Does he have tracts that can be passed out in front of a local Taco Bell, by chance?
Posted by: plunge
| June 30, 2006 12:15 PM
That solves one mystery. The "H" in "Jesus H. Christ!" stands for "haploid".
Posted by: Sam Paris
| June 30, 2006 12:22 PM
As a heathen (i.e., a Jew), I feel compelled to nitpick: it's oy vey, not oi vey. Oi is what the skinheads in England chant.
Posted by: Dave
| June 30, 2006 12:26 PM
So...where did that Y-chromosome come from again? Was it God's Y-chromosome?
Posted by: Dave S.
| June 30, 2006 12:39 PM
So, wait, he's saying it's possible for a fully developed human being to come from just the egg without the sperm fertilizing it?! That would explain all those other virgin births...
Posted by: llDayo
| June 30, 2006 12:48 PM
Ed, the way that letter reads to me, it sounds like he thinks you believe that ark was found, but you're giving credit to the wrong man.
Posted by: John Cercone
| June 30, 2006 12:58 PM
John Cercone wrote:
Yes, it does. Which makes him doubly clueless, doesn't it?
Posted by: Ed Brayton
| June 30, 2006 1:09 PM
WND and Stop the ACLU both picked up on the ark story today. On STACLU I left a one-word response along with a link to the complete dismantling you gave the claim a while back.
Posted by: Maj. M.T. Rational XXXIV
| June 30, 2006 1:59 PM
To be fair to Mr. Wyatt, I heard him on the radio shortly after his Red Sea discovery, while he claimed the find proved the Charleton Heston bit, the evidence didn't really point that way.
At the time (1999) he claimed that he had discovered a 7-8th Century bc marker commemorating the crossing. As this is exactly the sort of thing Hezekiah or Josiah might have done, I found that one plausible at least. The rest of the claims are as ridiculous as ever, of course.
And he (or the "Institute") might be claiming more, now, of course.
Posted by: kehrsam
| June 30, 2006 2:49 PM
A year or so back, we had a discussion on Internet Infidels on this, with a follower of Wyatt (he claimed to be working with Wyatts widow, IIRC). He claimed all kinds of stuff, on all the "scientific" tests that showed that Wyatt was correct, and sad thing, after constantly being torn apart by the facts, he still came back and declared "victory". Pretty sad, but it was worth the broken irony meters.
Posted by: Badger3k
| June 30, 2006 3:24 PM
Badger3k -
I remember that guy. Those threads were pure comedy. The guy was certifiable, but boy do I miss the entertainment he provided.
Posted by: Dave Carlson
| June 30, 2006 4:11 PM
Whoa whoa whoa, wait a second.
Jim Pinkoski? Jim " PYGMIES + DWARFS??" Pinkoski? That's marvelous.
Posted by: Skemono
| July 1, 2006 1:52 AM
Bob Cornuke reckons he's just found Noah's Ark, in Iran (a "better" location, as I believe you pointed out in a previous post). The underwhelming evidence is here (scroll down):
http://www.arkfever.com/
Posted by: Bartholomew
| July 1, 2006 2:55 AM
Bartholomew -
That story has been covered here already, but now there has been an update courtesy of, who else...the WorldNutDaily!
Apparently they have completed their tests, and gone is the term "basaltic dikes". Yes sir, the objects tested positive for petrified wood. Sadly though, they don't tell us what this test was or released the actual data. Maybe they just relied on the "looks like wood to me" test. They also say they found wood splinters and pottery shards 2000 feet higher, which apparently proves the ancients worshipped there.
I'll prognosticate here and suggest they analysed carbon in the samples, and found it to be in the range of 0.7 - 0.8%. That's just a guess.
Posted by: Dave S.
| July 1, 2006 9:02 AM
All this is really funny UNTIL you stop and think that these are actually real adults, spending real money, and wasting real time and lives looking for a supposed boat that carried the world's wildlife for 40 day while the entire planet was underwater.
Then it becomes almost a tragic waste.
In my view this is one of the real damages of religion. We needn't point to bloodshed in it's name but rather the damage it does to legions of brains.
Posted by: Chance
| July 1, 2006 11:21 AM
I learned about this most recent "discovery" on the ABC nightly news, and have heard that other stations were reporting it as well. I really can't understand why they would report this, and not see how embarrassing it is to them.
Posted by: Matthew
| July 1, 2006 12:16 PM
You people are barking up the wrong tree. Who really cares whether or not he found the Ark of the Covenant? I want to know what kind of flashlight he had. Totally reliable, it was his only source of light in an otherwise literally pitch-black environment and small enough to carry through very tight spaces. He supposedly passed out for at least 45 minutes upon discovering the Ark -- presumably without turning it off first -- so if you add that to the time it took for him to happen upon the right cave and return outside, that flashlight was the real hero of the story. I hope he wasn't making that part up.
Posted by: Knox | December 28, 2006 5:10 AM
To all of you...
Deuteronomy 29:29 (English Standard Version)
29"The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law.
I am sorry for those who do not believe. May God bless you!
Posted by: ROSE | July 5, 2009 12:00 PM
Seems like this james Albright is a Looney Wingnut. Obssessed with end of times, debunking everything and everyone.. Does he have a life? The end of times won't come. why can't his kind understand. Revelations is a thing of the past. During the israeli's time of oppression and the burning of the temple. everyone was in a state of fear. A lot of Anti Christ leaders have appeared already in the past civilizations. and even in modern times we see countries with rulers who are Anti Christ like.
Jesus Christ Never intended the earth to be destroyed but to give hope of both physical and spiritual salvation.
Cmon Give Ron Wyatt a bit of scientific credit and a chance. At least he tried but failed. Many scientists of his kind also have tried and failed in their pursuits. Were only human.
Racist Christian Extreemist. Your not quite different from the Muslim extreemists. and there will be no peace on earth as long as your kind exists.
Posted by: Joseph Milbourne | August 18, 2009 1:01 PM
I don´t need anything else to believe in God but the Bible!!
If It is wrong (which I am sure in not) there´s nothing else worth to believe!!........science?, plilosoply? being changed or improved every dacade!!
Be God true and human beings false!
Posted by: Julio Anaya | September 25, 2009 2:11 PM
I see some of Bill Dembski's students have found this thread.
Posted by: Eamon Knight | September 25, 2009 2:47 PM
ROSE - nice try, but you need to read the rest of your Bible (ESV or otherwise). Please recall that Paul was talking to believers when he called them "foolish" for being so easily deceived. With all the warnings in the Bible against false teachers in the end times, Christians are the *last* people that should be deceived. ... or so we should hope!
If you're looking for a verse to steer one's faith in matters that have yet to be proven, don't pull up a verse on the mystery of God. That's a non-sequitur. Just because someone doesn't believe something doesn't automatically mean that the mystery of God is at work; it could be the Holy Spirit ringing the "fraud alert" bell in his ear.
The best verse to use is one that tells us *how* to treat things that we're not certain of:
1 Thess 5:20-22 is the passage you need: Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil.
Simply put, you and I need to test these guys making these claims. If their claims pass muster, we should hold on to them; if they don't we should discard them. (Recall that Paul praised the Bereans for *not* taking him at his word, but instead, testing everything he said.)
While you're asking yourself if these guys' claims pass muster, ask yourself why they consistently refuse to submit their findings to *independent* lab tests. That should be an important clue right there.
I just got back from Egypt and Jordan and our tour guide, who happens to hold a PhD in geology and has taught at Bible colleges and seminars around the country, was at a meeting with Bob Cornuke recently. He offered to have Bob's 'proof' of the burnt top of Mt. Sinai tested for burn material, dating, etc. Bob declined the offer. No surprise.
Posted by: TIM | March 21, 2010 2:43 AM
Come on people! Everyone knows that the Ark is in a giant warehouse 'somewhere in America', along with the Roswell UFO, Miss Monroe's enema tube, Senator Specter's Magic Bullet and all the other neat-o stuff 'teh evul guberment' doesn't what you ta see!!eleventy-one!
Dingo
Posted by: DingoJack | March 21, 2010 5:59 AM
Cum on guys, wyatt has proved it. But do u hav any proof aganist him dat he s fraud????
Posted by: Joy | June 15, 2010 8:01 AM
Actually no, no he has not. In fact he stubbornly resists any attempt to verify his claims.
I refer you to the three Christian websites Ed cited in his original post.
Posted by: DaveL | June 15, 2010 8:10 AM
I sujest you start to take a look at the 10 commandments an todays so called christan observices an tell me how much of it is fraud to begin with........ thats why Im a Jew instead of christan today........
Posted by: hleek2003 | October 21, 2010 7:11 PM
Can the writer of this "scienceblog" disprove what Ron Wyatt's claim in any way? I mean I see that he writes about Ron Wyatt having done "tests". But all I see is that he is trying to disprove the writer by saying that the tests are unreliable, rather than proving why they were unreliable.
That's not a scientific way to disprove something.
Posted by: Chan | May 23, 2011 8:36 PM
Chan, I think the onus is actually on Ron Wyatt (or you as proxy).
Posted by: Chris From Europe | May 23, 2011 9:23 PM
Dear Wyatt supporters -
I sorry to hear of your reading/writng/comprehension difficulties.
Why not ask a friend who can read/write/comprehend to take you to your local library?
I'm sure the nice library staff can help you to find programs to overcome your reading/writing/comprehension difficulties.
I'll be thinking for you!
Dingo
Posted by: DingoJack | May 23, 2011 9:32 PM
When it comes to bullshit, big-time, major league bullshit, you have to stand in awe of the all-time champion of false promises and exaggerated claims, religion. No contest. No contest. Religion. Religion easily has the greatest bullshit story ever told. Think about it. Religion has actually convinced people that there's an invisible man living in the sky who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever 'til the end of time!
But He loves you. He loves you, and He needs money! He always needs money! He's all-powerful, all-perfect, all-knowing, and all-wise, somehow just can't handle money! Religion takes in billions of dollars, they pay no taxes, and they always need a little more. Now, you talk about a good bullshit story. Holy Shit!
Posted by: Jim Hankey | August 31, 2011 9:41 PM
If Ron Wyatt did make all of those amazing discoveries, it would seem plausible that he would have, at the very least, some sort of actual scientific proof. Therefore, based on his lack of scientific proof alone, I believe he is clearly a fraud.
Posted by: Dave Christian | October 16, 2011 3:55 AM
In answer to Jim Hankey, Please read the following:
Atheism - the belief that there was nothing & nothing happened to nothing & then nothing magically exploded for no reason creating everything & then a bunch of everything magically rearranged itself for no reason into Space, Time & Matter!
Here's a quote from C.S. Lewis as well:
“I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: “I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept His claim to be God.” That is the one thing we must not say. A man who said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.”
Posted by: Anthony - Christian | December 17, 2011 8:42 PM
Anthony-KKKristian:
Fuck you, fuck your non-existent GOD. I don't give much of a fuck about what you think; you and those like you, however, poison the well of philosophy by insisting for suspension of disbelief on the part of your moronic sheep--that I will treat the same way as I would treat AGW deniers, vaxxers or any other totally deluded and dangerously deluded belief system. Did I remember to mention that you should go fuck yourself?
Posted by: democommie | December 18, 2011 10:53 AM