Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dispatches from the Creation Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« DeLay's Delusions | Main | HPV Vaccine Approved; Religious Right Upset »

The GOP's Gay Panic Button

Category: Gay Rights
Posted on: June 9, 2006 9:29 AM, by Ed Brayton

Jacob Weisberg has an excellent article at Slate about why the gay marriage amendment isn't going to help the Republicans this time. He points out that they've basically had the amendment behind a "break glass in case of flagging ratings" case, but it has far less traction this time than it did in 2004. The first reason is because it's patently obvious that it's nothing more than a political ploy. They knew it had no chance of passing and they haven't even mentioned it since just before the 2004 election. And even the religious right is coming around to the fact that they really don't care much about it:

After Bush's re-election, Republicans simply blew off the issue--to the great dismay of leaders on the religious right, a few of whom indicated that they felt taken advantage of. Bush said in an interview that he saw little prospect for advancing a constitutional amendment in the Senate unless courts threw out the Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 law that says states don't have to recognize gay marriages solemnized in other states despite the "full faith and credit" clause. DOMA stands, the politics in the Senate haven't changed, and Bush was as good as his word about not lifting a finger. The way he has now returned to the issue, over the stated objections of both his wife and his vice president, is bluntly insulting to his evangelical backers, who are in effect being told: Come and get your election-year bone, before we kick you back into your doghouse on Nov. 8.

Another reason, perhaps even more important, is that attitudes have started changing just in the last 2 years. We're already seeing a significant change in public opinion polls as they get more used to the idea.

The third reason gay marriage will fail as an issue is that Bush is bucking the tide of history. The past two decades have seen a quiet revolution in attitudes toward homosexuality throughout the West. People in advanced democracies around the world are growing more accepting of gay unions by the year. Younger people, who have grown up in a more gay-tolerant environment, find the notion of same-sex marriage unshocking and are less susceptible to covert appeals to bigotry. Various polls show a shift of up to 12 percentage points on gay marriage in just the past few years. Culture war politics aren't exhausted and opposition to gay marriage remains a motivational issue in many places. But 2006 may be remembered as the year Republicans pressed the gay panic button and it failed.

And it will only get less and less effective for them. The tide has already turned on this one and they know it. Once it becomes clear that Massachusetts and Connecticut really haven't fallen apart and no one is marrying their pet goat, all of the ridiculous fear-mongering about the collapse of western civilization just loses its ability to scare people. They've already lost, they just don't know it yet.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

I'm skeptical of the notion that evangelicals are capable of staying home and not pulling the lever for a Republican on election day. They are too obsessed with politics, too involved in the fight to write their religion into law; no amount of betrayal or abandonment by Republican politicians can undermine the evangelicals' intense hatred of the liberal society around them and the threat of victory by those they hate the most: the "Democrat" Party. They will vote in November, and for the same reason they always vote: they are simply too stupid to understand that they are being used. Weisberg assumes that the electorate is rational, but they aren't. I get frustrated every time I read optimistic predictions from people on Slate or at the Washington Monthly - when will these soothsayers realize that America is beholden to the Christian Right and will be for a very long time? My money is on the Democrats gaining a few seats in Congress, but the Republicans maintaining control of both houses.

Posted by: Chuck Author Profile Page | June 9, 2006 9:49 AM

2

I hope the tide has actually changed as many believe, but I really feel that there is going to be some serious backlash in many places before its over. I'm in Georgia now and these people are still struggling with integration; throwing gays and immigrants at them as well is certainly going to get them riled up (already has). I'm not sure many folk really understand how militant folks like these are about forcing their version of religious morals on others. They don't seem to care about corruption, political hakcery, lies, or any of it as long as their religious cows are spoken to. I'm not optimistic, hopeful, but not optimistic

Posted by: Scott Reese Author Profile Page | June 9, 2006 10:24 AM

3

http://www.yorkdispatch.com/pennsylvania/ci_3909278
This same thing is happening in my state (Pennsylvania) but unfortunately seems like it's going to pass.

The proposed amendment to Pennsylvania's constitution would define "marriage" as a union between a man and a woman. It also would prohibit state, local and county governments from legally recognizing the unions of unmarried same-sex or heterosexual couples.

It's already passed the House by a large margin and will probably pass the Senate as well. It's definitely an election year and with a lot of the powerful incumbents being ousted in the primaries (and probably more in the actual November elections) they're trying to grab as many voters as possible to keep their seats. It'll be interesting, to say the least.

Posted by: llDayo Author Profile Page | June 9, 2006 11:30 AM

4

Some of them do know it; Bill Bennett basically admitted so on the Daily Show earlier this week.

Posted by: Todd Larason Author Profile Page | June 9, 2006 4:45 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.