One thing has become very clear: you can always count on Kevin McCullough to bring the crazy when it comes to gay rights (and pretty much anything else). Take a gander at this column responding to the New Jersey gay marriage ruling.
Despite all that their angry-mob front groups argue in front of television cameras to the contrary, radical homosexual activists despise the institution, and more importantly the sanctity, of marriage. That is the fundamental reason why they are seeking to destroy the institution.
Of course, Kevin, you’ve cracked the code and you’ve got it all figured out. Jason Kuznicki and his husband Scott, they’re just pretending to like being married. Hell, they’re just pretending to like one another. A relationship that has survived years of separation as Jason worked on his dissertation in France, that has included a good deal of sacrifice and hard work to establish the kind of basic protections that the rest of us take for granted….it’s all a con to fool you into thinking that they actually love each other.
But somehow you, who has never met them or virtually any other of the hundreds of thousands of gays and lesbians in such relationships, you’ve got it all figured out. We all thought we could slide this one past you, but you’re just too smart. You’ve used your mindreading powers to discern exactly what millions of people you’ve never met are thinking. We would have succeeded if not for those pesky kids. It’s that kind of crack thinking that leads to statements like this:
This week – dateline Trenton, N.J. – a unified panel of seven judges agreed that illegitimate sexual unions should be made equitable under law to that of monogamous married persons.
Yep, it’s all about the sex. These aren’t real people with children and loved ones, they’re just walking genitalia. All they do is have anal sex all day long. They don’t even stop to eat (being nothing but genitalia, they have no stomach, obviously). Just like your marriage has nothing at all to do with love or commitment or family, it’s all about sex. Oh, it’s not? Maybe that should make you stop and think.
With utter contempt for God and for the voters of their state, the New Jersey seven unanimously said that all who live in the confines of its borders must fundamentally agree to the moral premise that what the Bible terms perversion the voters should call healthy.
Well sure. And given that the state not only does not ban the sale and consumption of shellfish – something God himself is clearly opposed to in the Bible – but actually have a thriving industry based upon it, the state has clearly shown “utter contempt for God.” And by not stoning women who are not virgins on their wedding day, they obviously have forced upon the people of New Jersey that they must agree to the moral premise that what the bible terms perversion they voters must accept.
The answer is simple: No longer satisfied with practicing the unspeakable perverse sexual pleasures that their hearts seek in private bedrooms, they wish to be able to do so in public. They are also suffering from such immense guilt over their sexual behaviors, because they know inherently that the actions they perform are in fact unhealthy, that they will go to any means necessary to try and shut down the voices in their heads that tell them it is wrong.
They wrongfully believe that the guilty voice within them is an echo of a prudish state that seeks to limit their freedoms. They wrongfully believe that the judgment they feel is emanating from “Bible thumpers.” And what they fail to admit is that the voice that condemns them the loudest is never a human voice – but in fact the voice of their own conscience informed by the truth of the God who created them.
Uh, Kevin…the only one hearing voices in their head is you, pal. You’re the one who thinks he talks to God. And once again, I marvel at your ability to read the minds of millions of people you’ve never even met. It’s a wonderful gift you have. Can you teach it to me?
Radical homosexual activists hate biblical marriage, because to achieve its benefits and blessings they must first conform to God’s plan for sexuality, and the sinful nature in man is not willing to make such submission and conformity happen. The existence of joyful biblical marriage being practiced by “thumpers” in “Jesusland” infuriates them and thus the only action they can attempt is to destroy the institution that allows for such fundamental societal success.
I got news for you, Kevin. Neither they nor I give a damn about “biblical marriage”, any more than I care about “quranic marriage”. Marriage is a civil institution. If you want to imbue it with some special spiritual significance, be my guest. But that has nothing to do with the legal question. As for “destroying” the institution of marriage, when one of you braindead idiots comes up with a rational argument for why allowing gays to marry will destroy anyone else’s marriage, please present it. Until then, you’re talking out your ass.