Now on ScienceBlogs: What your Facebook page says about who you "really" are

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Religious Right Loves Gambling Ban | Main | Amusing Poker Story »

Fox Turns Foley Into a Democrat

Posted on: October 4, 2006 10:47 AM, by Ed Brayton

In true Harry Potter style, Fox News magically transformed Mark Foley into a Democrat:

foxoreillymarkfoleydem100306uy5.jpg

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

In late-night reruns, they did not have any party affiliation on those same clips.

Posted by: coturnix | October 4, 2006 10:56 AM

2

The only explanation that makes any sense, is that Bill O'Reilly was so upset that Mark Foley stopped IMing him, that he lost control.

Posted by: J-Dog | October 4, 2006 11:08 AM

3

The obvious answer is that, like Dick Armey, Foley never truly subscribed to the virtues and morals of the Republican party, and he turned his back on them, so he must be a closet Democrat.

Posted by: Jason I. | October 4, 2006 11:10 AM

4
In late-night reruns, they did not have any party affiliation on those same clips.

Isn't that even more damning?

Having realized their honest mistake they couldn't bring themselves to "label" Congressman Foley.

Posted by: Lettuce | October 4, 2006 11:25 AM

5

O'Reilly's show dishonest!? Say it ain't so!

Posted by: King Spirula | October 4, 2006 11:49 AM

6

But Foley has always been a democrat! When did Fox News start using 1984 as a guide on how to rewrite history?

Posted by: Miguelito | October 4, 2006 12:03 PM

7

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/5405596.stm

Apparently there were warnings about this going back to 1995

Posted by: mah9 | October 4, 2006 12:20 PM

8

Now Associated Press has also referred to Foley as a Democrat. They've corrected it.

Posted by: Jim Lippard | October 4, 2006 12:29 PM

9

Not J.K. Rowling, George Orwell. This reminds me of the scene in 1984 where Oceania changes sides in the war and news arrives half way through a political rally: hacks just pull down the propaganda posters and the speaker changes the name of the "enemy" mid-speech.

s.

Posted by: Steve Pells | October 4, 2006 12:51 PM

10

Someone needs to send this in to Olbermann. Get it out in the open. Shame Fox into either canceling O'Reilly or letting him drag them back down into the abyss from which they crawled.

Posted by: Mithrandir | October 4, 2006 3:13 PM

11

Well, he was once a Democrat -- a fact various conservative people feel the need to keep mentioning.

So the question is: Did he become a pedophile after converting to Republicanism or did he just find Republicanism more in line with his pedophilic tendencies.

Posted by: jpf | October 4, 2006 3:20 PM

12

I'm waiting for the bloggers that went apes**t over an "X" appearing on a graphic of Cheney for 0.7 second to make a lot of noice about this, but apnea is not in my plans for the wait.

Posted by: Pieter B | October 4, 2006 7:02 PM

13

-c +s in "noice." duh.

Posted by: Pieter B | October 4, 2006 7:31 PM

14

Haven't you all heard? Speaking of Fox, that channel couldn't get up an running until the '90's because they had to wait until they were able to get green cards for a critical mass of ex-Pravda writers and spinmeisters over from Moscow. They were out of jobs and Roger Ailes desperately needed some propagandists. And given the Military Commissions bill I suspect the line for torturers and jailers is a mile long at the US Embassy in Moscow.

Posted by: Keanus | October 4, 2006 8:13 PM

15

Not like Harry Potter; it's like Lord Voldemort.

Posted by: Joseph j7uy5 | October 4, 2006 10:09 PM

16
The obvious answer is that, like Dick Armey, Foley never truly subscribed to the virtues and morals of the Republican party, and he turned his back on them, so he must be a closet Democrat.
ARE YOU ANN COULTER?

Posted by: Andrew McClure | October 5, 2006 3:31 AM

17

Andrew do you read that stuff on purpose? God, I'm going to have to scratch my eyes out now. That woman is crazier than people give her credit for.

Posted by: Scott Reese | October 5, 2006 9:36 AM

18

Is there no stone of deceit that Fox will leave unturned?

This 1860 quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson (The Conduct of Life) seems appropriate for the Republican Party nowadays...
"The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons."

Posted by: Phobos | October 6, 2006 12:02 PM

19
The obvious answer is that, like Dick Armey, Foley never truly subscribed to the virtues and morals of the Republican party...
Yup, and I'll bet he doesn't wear a kilt either.

(for the noncognoscenti, that is a reference to the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy)

Posted by: somnilista, FCD | October 6, 2006 4:04 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM