Now on ScienceBlogs: What your Facebook page says about who you "really" are

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Our Looming Fiscal Disaster | Main | National Religious Freedom Day »

Law School Deans Condemn Stimson Statements

Posted on: January 16, 2007 9:53 AM, by Ed Brayton

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense of Detainee Affairs Curtis Stimson's comments urging corporate America to punish law firms that defend Gitmo detainees are causing the legal community to come together in a rare display of near-universal condemnation. Here's a letter signed by over 50 law school deans around the country objecting to Stimson's statements:

As law deans and professors, we find Secretary Stimson's statement to be contrary to basic tenets of American law. We teach our students that lawyers have a professional obligation to ensure that even the most despised and unpopular individuals and groups receive zealous and effective legal representation. Our American legal tradition has honored lawyers who, despite their personal beliefs, have zealously represented mass murderers, suspected terrorists, and Nazi marchers. At this moment in time, when our courts have endorsed the right of the Guantanamo detainees to be heard in courts of law, it is critical that qualified lawyers provide effective representation to these individuals. By doing so, these lawyers protect not only the rights of the detainees, but also our shared constitutional principles. In a free and democratic society, government officials should not encourage intimidation of or retaliation against lawyers who are fulfilling their pro bono obligations.

Hear, hear. They are urging the administration to "promptly and unequivocally repudiate" Stimson's statements; I don't think that goes near far enough. Stimson should not only be fired from his position, he should be brought before the ABA's board of ethics for his clear misconduct. His statements are nothing less than an attempt to intimidate law firms into not representing clients; it is the equivalent of the mafia intimidating witnesses. Both actions compromise the integrity of the legal process and both should be seriously punished. Jonathan Adler sums up the ethical breach pretty well:

It is well established that prosecutors have greater ethical obligation than private attorneys and, in particular, have an obligation to ensure the fairness of judicial proceedings - even where this may undermine the government's ability to secure a conviction. Stimson is not a prosecutor in his current position, but he is a former JAG and U.S. attorney, so he knows the rules. More important in this instance, he is an official involved with the detention and prosecution of detainees. He is, after all, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense of Detainee Affairs. Insofar as detainees are entitled to judicial process, whether habeas proceedings to challenge their detention or trials for alleged violations of the law of war, they are entitled to the defense counsel of their choice, not the government's. Deliberate action by a government attorney to interfere with that choice is unethical, and contrary to the spirit, if not the letter, of the relevant rules of legal ethics.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

If Stimson had been around in 1770, he would have villified John Adams for having the temerity to defend the British solders following the Boston Massacre. As it was, Adams risked quite a bit by defending the British, despite the fact that he had prevailed in court.

The more that I read of what comes out of the Bushies' mouths, the more that I despair, not only of American democracy--such as it is--but also of American rule of law.

The sad fact is that, after Stimson is cashiered--either because he resigns or is forced to resign, or after a Democrat takes over in 2009, Stimson will land himself a nice gig at a right-wing "think tank." These people are disgusting.

Posted by: raj | January 16, 2007 12:31 PM

2

Charles Fried, law prof at Harvard and Solicitor General for the second Reagan term, wrote a column in today's WSJ taking Stimson to the woodshed for his remarks.

Posted by: Keanus | January 16, 2007 10:19 PM

3

When are the democrats going to end the war?

Posted by: Bailey | January 17, 2007 5:51 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM