Now on ScienceBlogs: The Festival Recognizes Our First "Featured Fan"!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dispatches from the Creation Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« 7th Circuit on Religious Accommodation | Main | Help Chris Rodda Fight Historical Distortions »

Romney's Speech at Regent

Posted on: May 7, 2007 9:34 AM, by Ed Brayton

Mitt Romney gave the commencement speech at Pat Robertson's Regent University this weekend and threw plenty of empty cliches at them. I particularly liked this one:

"There is no work more important to America's future than the work that is done within the four walls of the American home," Romney said.

Unless, of course, that work is being done by the hundreds of thousands of gay parents raising children around the country. Then it's obviously all part of a pagan plot to destroy the family and everything that is good in the world. And I love his conflicting explanations for the VT shootings:

And he twice referred to the Virginia Tech shootings on April 16 in which a gunman killed 32 people before killing himself.

"We're shocked by the evil of the Virginia Tech shooting," Romney said. "I opened my Bible shortly after I heard of the tragedy. Only a few verses, it seems, after the Fall, we read that Adam and Eve's oldest son killed his younger brother. From the beginning, there has been evil in the world."

He added: "Pornography and violence poison our music and movies and TV and video games. The Virginia Tech shooter, like the Columbine shooters before him, had drunk from this cesspool."

So which is it, Mitt? Is it because Adam and Eve brought evil into the world, or did pornography and violence in the movies and video games take this otherwise good lad and turn him into a killer? And what about the 99.999999999999% of people who have also "drunk from this cesspool" but don't kill people? And why has violent crime been going down the last 20 years as popular culture has gotten more violent and sexual than ever? I know, I know, those are pesky logical questions and you were just trying to spout a few empty cliches.

The other thing that I love is how Romney is trying to reach out to evangelicals who consider his religion a cult by stressing that because he is a "person of faith", he's just like them. I think we should start referring to ourselves as "people of reason" to distinguish ourselves from "people of faith."

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

I would be content to be a 'person of what works'. I haven't had any coffee yet and right now that's the apogee of my aspiration.

Posted by: Lorri Talley | May 7, 2007 10:02 AM

2

I'm saying that "Mitt" translated from the Mormon, means "loser".

Posted by: J-Dog | May 7, 2007 10:07 AM

3

I'm glad that the republican candidates seem to be the ones contorting to get votes. The worst I've heard from the democrats is some accent changing when speaking to different groups, but (as far as I know) no one has switched entire positions, unlike the whole republican field (excluding perhaps Ron Paul, who doesn't have an ice cube's chance in hell of winning).

Posted by: Stuart Coleman | May 7, 2007 10:08 AM

4

On the whole, when I look at the democratic candidates I have some serious reservations, but they are head and shoulders above all the republican candidates.

The Repubs wouldn't be so bad except for all the crazy. Mitt totally switching bases, McCain going senile (or something), what happened to that whole party?

Posted by: Robert | May 7, 2007 10:14 AM

5

what about the 99.999999999999% of people who have also "drunk from this cesspool" but don't kill people?

Ah, would that it were so. ;-)

Posted by: Mike | May 7, 2007 10:19 AM

6
I think we should start referring to ourselves as "people of reason" to distinguish ourselves from "people of faith."

I like that a whole lot.

Posted by: Pieter B | May 7, 2007 11:35 AM

7
Romney: "In France, for instance, I'm told that marriage is now frequently contracted in seven-year terms where either party may move on when their term is up."

Oh really, Mr. Romney?

Posted by: Daniel Murphy | May 7, 2007 12:10 PM

8

Daniel - You silly reality-based thinker. If the voices in his head said it, it's perfectly reasonable to put it in a speech.

Posted by: AnneS | May 7, 2007 1:00 PM

9

I think we should start calling "people of of faith," "people of strong non-rational conviction."

Posted by: dogscratcher | May 7, 2007 2:03 PM

10

There is no contradiction, Romney has simply demonstrated that Cain must played a lot of violent video games...

...probably on an Apple.

Posted by: Sam Paris | May 7, 2007 2:26 PM

11
And what about the 99.999999999999% of people who have also "drunk from this cesspool" but don't kill people?

Only one out of 100 trillion? That's a low rate indeed.

Posted by: Steve Reuland | May 7, 2007 5:27 PM

12
I think we should start referring to ourselves as "people of reason" to distinguish ourselves from "people of faith."

I like that a hell of a lot better than "Brights".

Posted by: Wes | May 7, 2007 6:16 PM

13

I too like the "People of Reason" thing.

Romney: "In France, for instance, I'm told that marriage is now frequently contracted in seven-year terms where either party may move on when their term is up."

Oh really, Mr. Romney?

So the French are Vulcans? Maybe Mr. Romney has been reading too many science-fiction novels...

Posted by: Coin | May 7, 2007 6:26 PM

14

Maybe Romney was thinking of the France where the Coneheads were from?

How can you be that loose with the facts and think you are capable of being president?

Posted by: daedalus2u | May 7, 2007 9:15 PM

15

Why get worked up over Romney's opinion's, he'll only change them in a few days anyway :)

Oh, and we've always been at war with Eurasia.

Posted by: James | May 8, 2007 1:46 AM

16

Well really, Daedalus, how can you think anybody *not* that loose with the facts is likely to make it into office?

Posted by: Anuminous | May 9, 2007 10:22 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.