Now on ScienceBlogs: Rhodes Secretary: Wall Street Megabonuses Draining Our Young Talent

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Reggae Star Retracts Agreement on Gay Violence | Main | More STACLU LIes »

Janet Folger's Anti-Gay Lies

Posted on: July 26, 2007 9:09 AM, by Ed Brayton

I can see this woman is going to become a regular target, she spreads manure like an old farmer. Check out her latest absurd column at the Worldnutdaily and some of the lies it contains. Some of you have probably heard by now about the controversies going on down in Ft. Lauderdale, where they have a very large gay population but a virulently anti-gay mayor named Jim Naugle. There are two controversies, the first being a plan to house the Stonewall Library in the Ft. Lauderdale library building.

The Stonewall Library is an enormous private collection of books, magazines and a/v material by and about gays and lesbians, one of the largest in the world. After its current home was sold to developers, the owners of this archive proposed to move it to the same building that houses the Ft. Lauderdale public library; that has set the wingnuts off and sparked many lies. Folger is no exception:

He also voted against pornography in the public libraries. And for that, he's being protested against at Ft. Lauderdale City Hall today.

Conjures up visions of little kids sitting at little tables in the library thumbing through old issues of Studpuppy, doesn't it? That's the image they want you to get, but it's a flat out lie. Library Journal exposes that lie:

The Stonewall Library will not be a part of the public library, which occupies nearly a quarter of the 40,000-square foot building. Instead, it will become one of several tenants of ArtServe, a county-run arts agency...

Critical coverage in some conservative news outlets alleged that pornographic materials are part of the library, but Katzen said they're not found in the 18,000-volume lending library, which is visited by most of the library's 9000 annual patrons, all of whom must be 18 or older. "Almost everything that is in our lending library is available at Barnes & Noble or Borders," he said. It is the 40,000-item archive that holds the materials, such as Arab Slave Boys, that Naugle has targeted. "It's not an open archive," Katzen noted. Researchers must make appointments, and an archivist must be present during the research. The library also requires researchers to sign an archives patron agreement that says they are aware the collections are "not censored" and may contain content that is "sexually explicit, racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise personally offensive."

So much for that lie. But Folger isn't done. She piles another ridiculous lie on top of it by claiming that they're actually removing books that kids can read in order to put porn into the library:

Well, Johnny, Ft. Lauderdale Commissioners Cindi Hutchinson, Charlotte E. Rodstrom, and Carlton B. Moore voted to take out the books that everybody can read and replace them with homosexual pornography.

That's as bold and ridiculous a lie as you're likely to see today. She even invents a hypothetical conversation demonstrating how a parent should tell these lies to their children. When the child asks why everyone is mad at "that nice mayor", she replies, "Because he wants to protect you from all of it." But since the child couldn't possibly get access to the material in this private archive (most of which is not the least bit pornographic, by the way), this is just another lie to add to the list.

But she's not done lying yet:

Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, president of National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, reports the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the Woodhull Freedom Foundation have joined together to fight what they describe as "archaic" laws prohibiting public sex in restrooms and parks.

Makes you think gays are fighting for the right to have sex in front of your kids in public parks, doesn't it? You probably won't be surprised to find out this is yet another baldfaced lie. Here's the press release for that project, which is in fact a study of sex laws around the country:

The laws which the project will address range from the archaic--like Michigan's law prohibiting unmarried people from having sex and living together--to the grossly unjust--like Kansas' differing age of consent laws based on the gender of the persons involved--to those addressing facially valid public policy concerns--like laws against public lewdness, but which are routinely misused to persecute and prosecute people who participate in non-traditional forms of sexual expression.

"I've seen firsthand how the misuse of these laws has ruined the lives of gay and bisexual men," said Matt Foreman, the Task Force's Executive Director. "Few victims of this abuse ever come forward for fear of further embarrassment and the system counts on this silence. We intend to shine some light on these shameful practices." Foreman served as Executive Director of the New York City Gay & Lesbian Anti-Violence Project, the nation's largest gay victim assistance agency, from 1990-1996, and is a member of the New York City Human Rights Commission.

The project will have two phases. The first, a study of the laws with and case studies of how the laws have been selectively used to target minorities will be released at the Task Force's 17th Annual Creating Change Conference in St. Louis, Missouri, November 11-14. The second phase will include policy analysis, recommendations, and strategies for grassroots activists to use in overturning the laws or changing the way in which they are enforced.

Notice that they explicitly state that laws against public lewdness are valid public policy concerns and that they only seek to change the way in which they are enforced. That's a far cry from wanting to have sex in public parks. But hey, who cares about the truth when you're in the middle of a perfectly good irrational screed? But wait, as they say in late night infomercials, there's more:

The problem is worse than they are willing to admit, and it's not just in Ft. Lauderdale. Dr. E. Fields, in his book "Is Homosexual Activity Normal?", reveals "41 percent of homosexuals say they have had sex with strangers in public restrooms."

Dr. E. Fields? I bet you've never heard of him. Unless of course you're a member of the Aryan Nation, then you're probably familiar with his work. "Dr" Edward Fields is a chiropractor who has spent the last 55 years involved with various neo-Nazi organizations in the United States. The ADL has a few interesting details on "Dr" Edward Fields:

In 1952, still shy of twenty, he met the flamboyant racist J.B. Stoner while the two were attending law school in Atlanta, and joined Stoner's Christian Anti-Jewish Party (formerly the Stoner Anti-Jewish Party), a very small mass-mailing outfit in Atlanta. Stoner said he founded the organization to "out-Hitler Hitler," whom he called a "moderate"; his aim was "to make being Jewish a crime, punishable by death."

Fields eventually dropped out of law school, choosing instead to attend Palmer School of Chiropractic in Davenport, Iowa, in 1953. The following year he and another student allegedly posted signs on storefronts in Davenport and two other towns reading, "This store owned by Jews" and "Anti-Jewish Week, Feb. 21-28" (in fact, the end of February had been designated National Brotherhood Week). No charges were filed, but Fields was placed on probation. He remained undaunted, apparently; his schooldays continued to be marked by anti-Semitic and racist pickets, meetings and mailings. During this time he built networks across the American far-right underground. He attended Palmer until 1956, and thereafter referred to himself as "Dr. Fields" - a title that conferred prestige among hardcore racists.

Good source, Janet. There's much more in that article about Fields, including documentation of his involvement with the KKK and other white supremacy groups. Is this the sort of material that Folger reads and considers credible? Apparently so. Credible enough that she cites it without bothering to tell her readers who the source is. I guess this is how she puts her "Faith2Action."

Update: A commenter left a link to this essay by "Dr. Edward Fields" about the evils of interracial dating and why the Bible condemns it. It really has to be read to be believed.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

Great analysis, as usual. Thanks, Ed.

Off topic question: Do you ever do anything to get people such as Janet Folger to read what you have written such as notifying them by email (CONTACT@F2A.ORG, in this case), or does any response from such people depend on them learning about your posting by other means?

Posted by: Tim Tesar | July 26, 2007 10:14 AM

2

So if there are problems with putting the Stonewall materials in Fort Lauderdale, maybe the curators should inquire about space in the shiny brand-new facilities to the northwest in sunny Ava Maria, Fla...

Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | July 26, 2007 10:44 AM

3

I have always thought Janet Folger was just your typical far right fundie wowser.Her stock in trade overblown hysteria.I've read her stuff mainly for the comedy value.I have changed my mind.Citing Edward Fields for anything is beyond the pale.She had to know what a lunatic that son of a bitch is.Check out this lovely piece of trash from the esteemed Dr.Fields.I must warn you to wait at least an hour after eating before doing this.http://stormfront.org/truth_at_last/archives/interracial.htm

Posted by: spartanrider | July 26, 2007 11:23 AM

4

The Palmer School of Chiropractic? Right there you should know something's wrong with the guy...

Look, with the Weekly World News gone out of business, someone has to replace Ed Anger. Assuming Janet Folger isn't Ed Anger.

Posted by: Sastra | July 26, 2007 11:45 AM

5

The bugaboo of public sex goes back to the 1950s and is most irritating. Interestingly, there's a long history of gay men seeking each other out in "public" spaces (e.g., the Bowery in New York City, where we have records of it being a "cruising" spot at least by the 1890s). And the history of the practice has been well studied by historians and sociologists alike: basically, the structures of homophobia pushed gay men to seek spaces where they could fulfill their sexual needs outside the social institutions that forbade them.

However, in 2007, to the extent that gay men may still be having so-called "public sex," it's more like the way straight people have public sex. While I'm not exactly an advocate of copulating publicly, I also think the hype is a lot of smoke and mirrors. People of all sexual orientations troll for sex in public spaces, and they do so for the most part in ways so as not to get caught (e.g., the mile-high club, ever so popular among the straight jet-set crowd). When straight people get caught actually doing it (e.g., at "lovers' lane" in the backseat of a car), the police laugh and tell them to go home or maybe they get a fine (e.g., Raelph Feinnes). The hysteria only comes when it's same-sex couples who get caught, which is rarely, and then we have to save the beaches...er, I mean the children!

Here in San Francisco, the public restrooms in the parks were all shut down in the 60s and 70s to stave off the homosexual menace (and remained closed partly because of falling budgets). It still irritates me when I'm running through Golden Gate Park and there's nowhere to go to the bathroom because some idiot somewhere in the 1960s was afraid for the children so they had to shut down all the bathrooms.

You'd think these people had nothing better to worry about, like war and violence, starvation, lack of healthcare and affordable housing, etc.

Morons all.

Posted by: Todd O. | July 26, 2007 12:05 PM

6

Todd O. -

Count me as one of those caught having sex with a member of the opposite sex in public. Granted, it was after one in the morning, but the cops just told us to find someplace a little more private. Mind you, they didn't tell us to go home or find a room, just that we should find someplace more private, than the parking lot of the boat ramp at one of the myriad MI lakes.

I also tend to get irritated about the closure of public restrooms, to keep people from having sex in them. Bad enough that several MI rest areas are closed for it. Since living in Portland, OR, I have discovered that all of the public restrooms downtown are closed for the same reasons. This is particularly irritating when one is in the portion of downtown where there is a dearth of places to go, that don't require you buy something to use their bathrooms.

What's really great about this, is that while it stops people from screwing in the bathrooms, it means that there are a lot of homeless people and even some who are not, peeing in bus shelters, behind bushes or wherever they can get away with it. About a month ago, my five year old son, was out with mom. They were waiting for a bus, when my son found a little stream running down the sidewalk. At forst, mom thought nothing of it, as there were sprinklers running on the lawn of a nearby business. So my son started dropping leaves and twigs into the little stream. Then mom noticed that there was someone standing behind the bushes, from which the stream was flowing - big fun. Even better, there was a closed public restroom, just twenty or so yards away.

Posted by: DuWayne | July 26, 2007 1:59 PM

7

Considering the obvious lie she writes about the commissioners voting to remove books, wouldn't that be something that they could sue her for libel (assuming they knew about her rant)? Speaking of, why doesn't the WorldNutDaily see more libel cases?

Posted by: Davy | July 26, 2007 2:42 PM

8

Because their opposition is more adult than they are.

Posted by: Michael Suttkus, II | July 26, 2007 3:59 PM

9

1) A very large % of the men caught having sex in public areas with other men describe themselves as HETEROSEXUALS on the down low: married men, clergy, fathers... ...not gay men.

2) The citation of Edward Fields propaganda should be enough to get SPLC to label Folger's "Faith2Action" as an official hate group.

3) It's no surprise that the Liars 4 Jesus are one of biggest sector of the base of Bush supporters. Birds of a feather, and all.

Posted by: SharonB | July 26, 2007 4:51 PM

10

Oh yeah, and
4) What's Joe Nicolosi, of ex-gay NARTH, doing shooting his mouth off as a source on this issue? He is an advocate of widely discredited reparative therapy. He is not a credible authority on GLBT civil rights groups.

Posted by: SharonB | July 26, 2007 4:57 PM

11

Previously I gave Folger a pass of sorts, assuming that she was too stupid to lie and maybe even too stupid to be mean. That anti-evolution "column" would have been an embarrassment to a fifth-grade Southern Baptist.

However, it seems that she's both stupid and dishonest, and mean as well. I'd like to do something I never bother doing and send her an extremely scathing e-mail, but she doesn't list a personal address on her home page (http://www.janetfolger.net/). There's always CONTACT@F2A.ORG, as http://www.faith2action.org is basicaly Folger's too, but I doubt she'd see anything sent there. I guess I'll just continue bitching and tearing her a wider asshole on blogs.

Posted by: kemibe | July 26, 2007 4:59 PM

12

Now this is really interesting. I don't think I've ever seen the barriers between WorldNetDaily and Stormfront openly come down before.

Posted by: Coin | July 26, 2007 5:09 PM

13

Even if we set aside the rampant homophobia (and with this lady that's a BIG pile to push aside) her claim is nonsense. Libraries have to have odd and unpleasant material for researchers. Sanitizing library collections destroys a large part of their value. "Sexually explicit, racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise personally offensive" materials are invaluable primary sources for historians and sociologists. Along those lines, is there an archive preserving this lady's and her ilk's ramblings for future study? It would be interesting to see how the ideas of theocrats, klans men, and skinheads have evolved over the last fifty years.

On a lighter note, flamboyant racist= Hitler in hotpants.

Posted by: Iskra | July 26, 2007 5:17 PM

14

As a gay man, I find the concept of random public sex pretty pathetic, yet as a closeted teenager, that was the only outlet I had, so I am not judging anyone. But to assume that any member of a group can be characterized by the worst member of that group (as the good mayor of Ft. Lauderdale, not to mention Ms. Folger, have done on many occassions) is immoral, unChristian, and unAmerican.

Besides, if they did not want men to have sex in public rest rooms, why is there a chain of truck stops in the MidWest known as "Kum and Go" (I kid you not)?

Posted by: CPT_Doom | July 26, 2007 9:58 PM

15

You know, if you take that World Nut photo of her with the mayor, and change the suit to pink and the hair to brown, she bears an uncanny resemblance to J.K. Rowlings description of Professor Umbridge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolores_Umbridge

And kemibe, given what she says on her show, she does seem to read her email. F2A is a fairly small organization, with a minimal staff. I'm prety sure she'll see whatever you send.

If you want your jaw to drop even further, try her F2A Partner "News" Article listed at http://www.faith2action.org/NewsStory.cfm?Story_ID=2402. Not only is Harry Potter the gateway to the devil, but so are magic markers, magic eight balls, and ALF. Oh, and Chris Angel is harboring demonic powers. Seriously, it makes me weep for future.

Posted by: General Zia | July 26, 2007 10:15 PM

16

Yes, Janet Folger is a serial misinformer/liar on gay issues. More here.

Posted by: Terry K. | July 26, 2007 10:45 PM

17

"Sexually explicit, racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise personally offensive" materials are invaluable primary sources for historians and sociologists.

Too true. I don't know what I'd do without my dead racists. At the very least, I'd have to change the name of my blog.

And I'm not even a historian or sociologist.

Posted by: Skemono | July 26, 2007 11:33 PM

18

Skemono -

At the very least, I'd have to change the name of my blog.

That would be very sad, it's really quite an amusing name.

Posted by: DuWayne | July 26, 2007 11:55 PM

19

Why thank you, DuWayne.

Posted by: Skemono | July 27, 2007 12:28 AM

20

White is definitely a hypocrite of the worst kind.

Now I know where my racist ass father gets his vitriol against black people from.

Posted by: Tony P | July 29, 2007 2:11 PM

21

This kind of gay propoganda is unworthy of being a news source. (I do not in any way condone lying by those who are against homosexuality.) The choice to participate in homosexuality is what is truly shameful and God forbid that society should not continue to say so. If and when it does expect the same judgments to fall, that fell on Sodom and Gommorrha.

Posted by: truth1 | August 27, 2007 7:10 AM

22

I just clicked thru to WND. It looks like she scrubbed the reference to "Dr." Fields.......

Posted by: EyeNoU | September 10, 2008 10:36 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM