Now on ScienceBlogs: The animal research experience

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Haggard Needs Money | Main | Phase 4 of the Anti-Evolution Movement Begins »

American Whistleblowers Imprisoned in Iraq

Posted on: August 27, 2007 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton

The AP reports:

One after another, the men and women who have stepped forward to report corruption in the massive effort to rebuild Iraq have been vilified, fired and demoted.

Or worse.

For daring to report illegal arms sales, Navy veteran Donald Vance says he was imprisoned by the American military in a security compound outside Baghdad and subjected to harsh interrogation methods.

There were times, huddled on the floor in solitary confinement with that head-banging music blaring dawn to dusk and interrogators yelling the same questions over and over, that Vance began to wish he had just kept his mouth shut.

Here's what Vance saw and reported to the FBI:

He had thought he was doing a good and noble thing when he started telling the FBI about the guns and the land mines and the rocket-launchers - all of them being sold for cash, no receipts necessary, he said. He told a federal agent the buyers were Iraqi insurgents, American soldiers, State Department workers, and Iraqi embassy and ministry employees.

The seller, he claimed, was the Iraqi-owned company he worked for, Shield Group Security Co.

''It was a Wal-Mart for guns,'' he says. ''It was all illegal and everyone knew it.''

So Vance says he blew the whistle, supplying photos and documents and other intelligence to an FBI agent in his hometown of Chicago because he didn't know whom to trust in Iraq

Did they start investigating such clearly illegal activity that also puts our soldiers at greater risk? Nope. They threw Vance in a military prison and treated him like a terrorist:

For his trouble, he says, he got 97 days in Camp Cropper, an American military prison outside Baghdad that once held Saddam Hussein, and he was classified a security detainee.

Also held was colleague Nathan Ertel, who helped Vance gather evidence documenting the sales, according to a federal lawsuit both have filed in Chicago, alleging they were illegally imprisoned and subjected to physical and mental interrogation tactics ''reserved for terrorists and so-called enemy combatants.''

Vance and Ertel are hardly alone:

Corruption has long plagued Iraq reconstruction. Hundreds of projects may never be finished, including repairs to the country's oil pipelines and electricity system. Congress gave more than $30 billion to rebuild Iraq, and at least $8.8 billion of it has disappeared, according to a government reconstruction audit.

Despite this staggering mess, there are no noble outcomes for those who have blown the whistle, according to a review of such cases by The Associated Press.

''If you do it, you will be destroyed,'' said William Weaver, professor of political science at the University of Texas-El Paso and senior advisor to the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition.

''Reconstruction is so rife with corruption. Sometimes people ask me, 'Should I do this?' And my answer is no. If they're married, they'll lose their family. They will lose their jobs. They will lose everything,'' Weaver said.

They have been fired or demoted, shunned by colleagues, and denied government support in whistleblower lawsuits filed against contracting firms.

''The only way we can find out what is going on is for someone to come forward and let us know,'' said Beth Daley of the Project on Government Oversight, an independent, nonprofit group that investigates corruption. ''But when they do, the weight of the government comes down on them. The message is, 'Don't blow the whistle or we'll make your life hell.'

''It's heartbreaking,'' Daley said. ''There is an even greater need for whistleblowers now. But they are made into public martyrs. It's a disgrace. Their lives get ruined.''

Bunnatine ''Bunny'' Greenhouse knows this only too well. As the highest-ranking civilian contracting officer in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, she testified before a congressional committee in 2005 that she found widespread fraud in multibillion-dollar rebuilding contracts awarded to former Halliburton subsidiary KBR.

Soon after, Greenhouse was demoted. She now sits in a tiny cubicle in a different department with very little to do and no decision-making authority, at the end of an otherwise exemplary 20-year career.

People she has known for years no longer speak to her.

''It's just amazing how we say we want to remove fraud from our government, then we gag people who are just trying to stand up and do the right thing,'' she says.

In her demotion, her supervisors said she was performing poorly. ''They just wanted to get rid of me,'' she says softly. The Army Corps of Engineers denies her claims.

''You just don't have happy endings,'' said Weaver. ''She was a wonderful example of a federal employee. They just completely creamed her. In the end, no one followed up, no one cared.''

But Greenhouse regrets nothing. ''I have the courage to say what needs to be said. I paid the price,'' she says.

Then there is Robert Isakson, who filed a whistleblower suit against contractor Custer Battles in 2004, alleging the company - with which he was briefly associated - bilked the U.S. government out of tens of millions of dollars by filing fake invoices and padding other bills for reconstruction work.

He and his co-plaintiff, William Baldwin, a former employee fired by the firm, doggedly pursued the suit for two years, gathering evidence on their own and flying overseas to obtain more information from witnesses. Eventually, a federal jury agreed with them and awarded a $10 million judgment against the now-defunct firm, which had denied all wrongdoing.

It was the first civil verdict for Iraq reconstruction fraud.

But in 2006, U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III overturned the jury award. He said Isakson and Baldwin failed to prove that the Coalition Provisional Authority, the U.S.-backed occupier of Iraq for 14 months, was part of the U.S. government.

Not a single Iraq whistleblower suit has gone to trial since.

''It's a sad, heartbreaking comment on the system,'' said Isakson, a former FBI agent who owns an international contracting company based in Alabama. ''I tried to help the government, and the government didn't seem to care.''

The whole article is stunning, but not surprising.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

[Judge Ellis] said Isakson and Baldwin failed to prove that the Coalition Provisional Authority...was part of the U.S. government.

That's news to me. I seem to recall having helped set up their communications, as part of the Army's network there. I also vaguely remember the CPA being run by retired GEN Garner, before Ambassador Bremer took over, and I really got the impression that both of them were appointed to the position by the President.

Of course, the CPA website does point out that it is a multi-national body working under the authority of the UN. Perhaps the accusation of fraud, waste, and abuse should be pushed back one step - to those who are funding the CPA in the first place. Surely, funding a racketeering organization HAS to be some sort of violation...

Posted by: BobApril | August 27, 2007 9:40 AM

2

Will this story finally bring an end to the morally bankrupt claim that these interrogation techniques are OK because they'll only be used against the evil terrorists? Please?

Posted by: AnneS | August 27, 2007 9:56 AM

3

Minor correction to my previous - that should be "retired LTG Garner..."

Posted by: BobApril | August 27, 2007 10:08 AM

4

Read this AP report in conjunction with "The Great Iraq Swindle" at Rolling Stone and see if you can manage to contain the outrage.

Every time I see one of these stories I'm reminded of Col. Ted Westhusing being driven to suicide by the corruption in Iraq.

Posted by: Hume's Ghost | August 27, 2007 1:57 PM

5

And here we sit.

Lots of people voted for the Democrats in 2006 and gave them a majority, hoping they'd -do- something.

Well? Our hands our tied, dear Democrats.Through your collusion with the Republicans, you've made it impossible for us to elect anyone from outside the D-R club, so we have to vote for you if we want something other than Republicans.

We've given you our votes and our hope and what have you done for us?

Posted by: Michael E | August 27, 2007 3:03 PM

6

Michael - the best explanation I've heard is that if the Democrats fix things now, then they lose those issues for the Presidential election next year. They'd rather let the situation get worse in order to reap the rewards of blaming Bush. A rather cynical explanation, I know...it does seem time for a viable third party, doesn't it?

Posted by: BobApril | August 27, 2007 3:16 PM

7

Bob,

Yeah. Too much trouble to run on their *accomplishments*, ain't it...

Posted by: Michael E | August 27, 2007 3:23 PM

8

What the hell were the charges?

Maybe I didn't read the story carefully enough. What the hell were they charged with?

I mean, not that it matters hugely. It's obvious why they were really arrested. But were they arrested on some trumped-up other charge... or were they overtly arrested for blowing the whistle?

Posted by: Greta Christina | August 27, 2007 5:10 PM

9
What the hell were the charges?

Greta, why do you want the terrorists to win? :P

Posted by: Ebonmuse | August 27, 2007 7:00 PM

10

Just stop it Greta... why do you want to make baby Jesus cry?
lol

Posted by: doctorgoo | August 27, 2007 7:02 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.