Now on ScienceBlogs: Another contender for the worst reporting ever: "Coma man"

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Faith vs Reason in India | Main | Bush to Nominate Mukasey for AG »

McCain: Exile Them!

Posted on: September 17, 2007 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton

Is there anything funnier than watching politicians pander? They get going and they just can't stop themselves from saying something breathtakingly idiotic. Like this little gem from John McCain while speaking at a VFW hall about MoveOn.Org's criticism of Gen. Petraeus:

"It's disgraceful, it's got to be retracted and condemned by the Democrats and MoveOn.org ought to be thrown out of this country, my friends."

Why yes, John, that's a wonderful idea. A group says something you don't like, throw their 4 million members out of the country. An ordinary person would consider that to be tyrannical and a clear violation of the Constitution; the good folks at the VFW hall in Hudson, NH, actually applauded it. Very nice.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

McCain is following the Republican tradition set under Lincoln to exile those who disagree with the administration. I would be able to laugh it off if it had not happened in the past.

Posted by: Mike | September 17, 2007 9:31 AM

2
the Republican tradition set under Lincoln to exile those who disagree with the administration.

Didn't Lincoln start a war for the sole purpose of getting back people who exiled themselves?

At this point, I think McCain is so desperate that he's selling his soul to anybody who still wants to vote for him. Seriously, would anybody who was offended by his statement have even considered supporting him before?

I'm loving this two-year presidential campaign. If Obama can go the next year without any screwups I think he's guaranteed the win.

Posted by: Brandon | September 17, 2007 10:30 AM

3

And just four days before Constitution Day. What impeccable timing McCain has.

Posted by: RBH | September 17, 2007 11:25 AM

4

I'm sure that McCain meant it literally. No politician ever uses hyperbole for rhetorical emphasis. And I'm sure the VFW members are too stupid to recognize hyperbole when they hear it, so every single one of them was applauding the literal interpretation of the the final clause in the sentence.

Posted by: delurking | September 17, 2007 11:49 AM

5

delurkin -

So...when do we take politicians to mean what they say and when do we take them not to mean what they say?

Even if it were only a calculated bit of "hybebole", it speaks volumes that MacCain is reduced to such blatant and pathetic demagoguery to try and drum up support.

I'm trying to respect the guy, but he ain't making it easy.

Posted by: Dave S. | September 17, 2007 12:29 PM

6

I don't respect McCain either. There are many things to substantive things to criticize him for, for example the pandering to groups he condemned when the political climate was different. His positions on campaign finance reform are another.

However, it is my opinion that picking out this statement is silly. Sure, sometimes politicians are willfully evasive, so it is difficult to know if they mean what they say. But, do Mr. Brayton and MoveOn.org really think McCain is announcing that under his administration the Justice Dept. would round up MoveOn.org members and try to have them exiled? Or, does someone think he intends for VFW members to carry those MoveOn.org members to the border and literally throw them across it? I think it is pretty obvious that the statement is simply a hyperbolic expression of disapproval.

Posted by: delurking | September 17, 2007 12:47 PM

7

delurking wrote:

But, do Mr. Brayton and MoveOn.org really think McCain is announcing that under his administration the Justice Dept. would round up MoveOn.org members and try to have them exiled?

Of course not. I think that McCain was doing what politicians often do, which is get on such a roll of pandering - gotta say what they wanna hear to whatever audience you're speaking to - that they inadvertently say something that results in something quite revealing. No, I don't think that McCain, as president, would vote for such a policy. But I do think that a sizable subset of the right wing would indeed go for exiling those who disagree with them. I've heard far too many, without a hint of exaggeration or irony, argue some variation of the "if you don't love this country, why don't you leave it" argument to think otherwise. Is it a large part of the population? Probably not. Maybe 10 or 15%. But they tend to be politically active and they tend to be right wing. And I think it's worth condemning and exposing.

As for the suggestion that it was mere hyperbole, McCain himself says otherwise. He says he didn't mean it at all, that he misspoke, which is different than saying it was misinterpreted and it was meant figuratively. And it's funny, I condemn people every day for their views here, indeed for far more vile and repulsive views than the ones McCain was condemning, and not once have I ever suggested that anyone be thrown out of the country.

Posted by: Ed Brayton | September 17, 2007 12:57 PM

8

And it doesn't appear this was an off the cuff remark made in the heat of passion...it was a clear and deliberate statement. That he didn't mean it literally we probably all agree. That he said it at all, even as a rhetorical device, is the problem.

On another note, I've always wondered where these people thrown out of America were supposed to be thrown to?

Posted by: Dave S. | September 17, 2007 1:35 PM

9

The only thing more idiotic than McCain's comment are the comments of some of the people at the CBS page where the video is posted:

The Moveon organization has always said that the War on Terror, that the War on Radical Islam is illegitimate and is a war that was concocted by the Bush administration solely for oil.The recent refusal by Clinton and Obama not to condemn the Move On smear of General Petraeus that Clinton and Obama both answer to Move On.If 9 11 was not a legitimate reason to go on the military offensive against terrorists and Move on has a position of the nation of NEVER going to war to defend itself, I believe that puts Clinton and Obama into serious question of whether either is willing or able to defend this country. MOREOVER, THE FACT THAT OSAMA BIN LADIN REPEATEDLY CRITICIZES THE DEMOCRATS FOR THEIR EFFORTS IN HIS LATEST VIDEO PROVES HE WANTS THE DEMOCRATS TO TRY HARDER. HE IS ON THEIR SIDE!!! The War on Terrorism will NOT end if we withdrawl from Iraq. If Hillary answers to Moveon, HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT HER BEING IN OFFICE WHEN THE COUNTRY IS AT WAR If Obama answers to Moveon, I ask all African American voters: HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT HIM BEING IN OFFICE WHEN THE COUNTRY IS AT WAR I hope both Candidates are up for possibly the most difficult struggle this country has ever experienced- one that could determine it''s existance or destruction. If you think this all Republican hype, than why did the French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner today warn that Iran''s failure to renounce nuclear weapons could lead to war? Posted by bizzzz at 12:22 PM : Sep 17, 2007 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/14/politics/main3262322.shtml

This guy must be one of the people McCain is trying to reach.

Posted by: Wes | September 17, 2007 1:37 PM

10

I donated 25 amerikkkan dollars to move-on to help get the ad in the paper. I'm not leaving. I'll give move-on another 25 bucks the next time they ask, too. Screw McCain. He used to verge on the almost acceptable. Now he's dropped off into the land of tard.

Posted by: bybelknap, FCD | September 17, 2007 3:42 PM

11

I wonder if we see a spike in moveon memberships?

McCain is that guy who just realized he can't swim as far as he thought he could, half way across the lake. He's desperately thrashing about, looking for a direction, any direction where help may be.

What bothers me, hyperbole or not, is the increasing use of "throw them out" or "if you don't like it, leave" in the GOP rhetoric. This was a big one slung at those of us who opposed the war in Iraq, that and we were "unpatriotic, cowards," etc.

Posted by: dogmeatib | September 17, 2007 8:11 PM

12

The only thing more idiotic than McCain's comment are the comments of some of the people at the CBS page where the video is posted

Oh, I think we can do even worse. Has the video been posted on Youtube yet?

Posted by: Coin | September 17, 2007 8:14 PM

13

I wonder if the same people who are defending McCain's statement here as "hyperbole" would be willing to cut the same slack to, say, Senator Hillary Clinton. If the Senator said that those who publicly accuse her of being a communist (and such people do exist. Gary Aldrich wrote a column for townhall.com where he did just that) should be "thrown out of the country," do you think the "McCain wasn't being literal" folks would jump to her defense. Doubt it. At best, she'd be labeled as "shrill." At worst, we'd be hearing from conservative radio talk show hosts across the land how, if elected president, the senator would seek to deport all those who are critical of her.

Posted by: daniel rotter | September 17, 2007 9:52 PM

14

On another note, I've always wondered where these people thrown out of America were supposed to be thrown to?

Perhaps McCain visualizes all the liberals being stuffed onto old prison buses, driven down to the nearest Mexican border crossing, and simply being shoved out.

If they're taking requests, I've always fancied a vacation in India and Nepal.

Posted by: George Cauldron | September 17, 2007 10:28 PM

15

Ed Brayton wrote:
"Of course not. I think that McCain was doing what politicians often do, which is get on such a roll of pandering - gotta say what they wanna hear to whatever audience you're speaking to - that they inadvertently say something that results in something quite revealing."

This is a fair point. However, I think the post you link to does the same sort of thing. For example, Ms. Cox introduces the quote with "The tape is clear. He said:",

The campaign clarifies, saying in essence, that it was hyperbole for rhetorical effect.

Ms Cox closes it with "There is, of course, a significant difference between exile and criticism," thereby rejecting that explanation.

Posted by: delurking | September 18, 2007 8:05 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM