A few weeks ago I reported on an ACLU suit against the state of Louisiana over two earmarks in the budget that gave $120,000 to two churches in the state without any statement of purpose whatsoever. A Federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction stopping the transfer pending the outcome of the case (see the order here). The state should just admit they can't do this, but I suspect they won't.
Dispatches from the Culture Wars
Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture
Profile
Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)
Search
Recent Comments
- ppnl on Conservative Originalism and Interracial Marriage
- John Pieret on The Kirk Cameron Action Kit
- Taz on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- Troublesome Frog on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- Captain Patriot on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- Taz on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- slpage on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- Modusoperandi on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- Captain Patriot on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- Will on Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
Recent Posts
- Conservative Originalism and Interracial Marriage
- The Kirk Cameron Action Kit
- Right Wing Rap: Just Stop. Please.
- Missouri Republicans Call For Violent Revolution
- Cert Denied in Religious Graduation Speech Case
- Cops: Break the Law, Change Departments
- Oh Ye Of Little Faith
- Hilarious Onion Article
- 52% of Republicans Think Obama Not Really Elected
- USCIRF Blasts Defamation of Religion Resolutions
Blogroll
Science Blogs
- The Panda's Thumb
- Carl Zimmer
- The Austringer
- Evolution Blog
- De Rerum Natura
- Evolving Thoughts
- Preposterous Universe
- Butterflies and Wheels
- John Lynch
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- NCSE's Legal Blog
- Red State Rabble
- Thoughts From Kansas
- Appellate Blog
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Jack Balkin
- Legal Theory Blog
- ACS Blog
- Reason and Liberty
- Overlawyered
- Supreme Court Times
- Positive Liberty
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Andrew Sullivan
- Talking Points Memo
- Daily Kos
- Media Matters
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Classical Values
- Virginia Postrel
- Jim Anderson
- Strange Doctrines
- John Scalzi
- The Pryhills
- Temperantia
- Rev. Spork
- Electric Commentary
- Two Aarons
- Farkleberries
- Paul Phillips
- Henry Neufeld
- Talk.Origins
- Talk.Reason
- Antievolution.org
- National Center for Science Education
- Talk.Design
- Michigan Citizens for Science
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
Other Information
Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb
Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.
Ed's Audio and Video
Declaring Independence podcast feed
YearlyKos 2007
Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement
Audio of Greg Raymer Interview
E-mail Policy
Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.
My Ecosystem Details
« Hitchens and Jefferson | Main | More Compelling Oversight of Private Contractors »
Injunction Granted in Louisiana Church Funding Suit
Posted on: October 9, 2007 9:13 AM, by Ed Brayton
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More




Comments
I find it amusing that people in the media will openly worry about Mitt Romney's Mormonism, but they won't come out and say "Will Romney give my tax money to Mormons like George Bush is doing to evangelical christians?"
Since Bush has been getting away with it for six years, he's encouraging state governments to do the same thing.
Posted by: WTFWJD | October 9, 2007 12:27 PM
I haven't read too many preliminary injunction decisions, but this one seems to me to make an unusually strong statement, and this decision read more like a final disposition than I had expected. To grant a preliminary injunction, the standard is a strong likliehood of prevailing on the merits, but in the decision the judge seems to actually make a decision on the merits, stating bluntly that the grants violate the Supreme Court's Lemon test.
With such a strong statement--and one that I have a hard time imagining a good counterargument against--I wonder if the State will try to let this quietly go away, or if they'll actually try to fight it.
But I keep forgetting: these conservatives are the true constitutionalists, so anything they do must be constitutionally ok.
Posted by: JamesH | October 9, 2007 9:05 PM