Seed Media Group

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a freelance writer and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media.(static)

Search This Blog



Recent Comments


Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Pilot Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Skepticism Wins Again | Main | Balko is right »

Anti-ACLU Quote of the Week

Category:
Posted on: March 26, 2008 9:09 AM, by Ed Brayton

This was so perfect that I had to edit my speech for Wednesday night to include it. From anti-gay whacko James Hartline and quoted, naturally, in the Worldnutdaily:

"The American Civil Liberties Union has done everything possible to destroy Christianity in the American culture and government. From tearing down crosses on public property to removing crosses and the Ten Commandments from governmental buildings, there has been no greater hate machine against our constitutional right to free religious expression in America than the ACLU!" Hartline said.

Notice how he shifts ground, using examples of government religious expression and then claiming that the ACLU is out to destroy individual religious expression? That's standard operating procedure for the ACLU haters.

Comments

He forgot to call them communists. No respect for tradition.

Posted by: Suricou Raven | March 26, 2008 9:59 AM

This sort of conflation shouldn't come as a surprise when you realize that "Conservative Protestants' Religious Beliefs Contribute to Their Low Wealth", and that education and wealth are good indicators of each other. From the actual paper (free access!):

Low educational attainment is an important reason for low CP [Conservative Protestant] wealth. There is long-standing evidence that religion affects education (Glenn and Hyland 1967; Greeley 1969; Lenski 1961), and recent research shows that CPs complete comparatively low levels of schooling (Darnell and Sherkat 1997; Sherkat and Ellison 1999). CP cultural orientations tend to be at odds with the approaches of nonreligious schools and universities that propagate secular humanist values (Sikkink 1999) and promote scientific investigation rather than acceptance of divine truths (Darnell and Sherkat 1997). ... As a result, educational attainment for CPs is significantly lower than for members of other faiths (Darnell and Sherkat 1997), declining most noticeably after high school (Lehrer 1999).
To some people, the conflation that Ed outlines is non-existent. They only see government interfering with their "God-given" rights (through a "Christian-influenced" Constitution) of freedom of religion. The way to deal with these sorts of anti-ACLU accusations from such Conservative Protestants (wingnuts thought they may be) may well be to follow the advice that Cortunix suggests over at his blog:
Some people only know the language of power. They see conciliation and compromise as weakness. Show strength. If they are sissies hiding behind machismo, slam them hard. You have nothing to lose. Some will convert and come to your side. Some will go cower in the corner. None will hang around risking your anger for very long.
I mean, we aren't trying to "convert the choir" with the issues of public displays of religion; proselytization in schools; accusations of a "homosexual agenda"; the mythology of the United States being founded as a "Christian nation"; and others. Why not use their own tactics of bluster and steam-rolling (which they can understand) against them? (Of course, make sure we have all our facts correct at the get-go.)

Posted by: Umlud | March 26, 2008 10:32 AM

Tell me again about that amendment thingy about separation of church and state that you have in America? I would ask Mr Hartline but i don't think he would understand about such a thing.

Posted by: Richard Eis | March 26, 2008 2:14 PM

""The American Civil Liberties Union has done everything possible to destroy Christianity in the American culture and government."

Whoa. "Everything possible?" I mean, you wouldn't have thought it, but in some ways they don't have much imagination, do they?

Posted by: Sastra | March 26, 2008 4:19 PM

I can remember telling Ira Glasser that for me the problem with the ACLU was that it wasn't radical enough, and he just laughed. Isn't it a crying shame that we need an organization like that just to defend the status quo against the reactionaries!

Posted by: Elizabeth | March 26, 2008 9:01 PM

Umlud, you said the following:

>> This sort of conflation shouldn't come as a surprise when you realize that "Conservative Protestants' Religious Beliefs Contribute to Their Low Wealth", and that education and wealth are good indicators of each other.

Hilarious. I don't find the study credible at all. She says that conservative protestants are "overrepresented" in the classes of people with the lowest amount of wealth. Instead of saying that conservative protestants constitute the greatest number of poor people, she instead says that less affluent areas tend to be overwhelmingly conservative protestant. And how does she measure affluence? By using absolute dollars - ignoring the fact that dollars are not wealth, PURCHASING POWER is wealth. You may have $300,000, but if it can only get you a crappy 2-bedroom condo in Compton, CA, you are NOT wealthier than a person who puts up $100,000 and buys a 5-bedroom house on an acre in Kansas. In KS you can have a similar living standard as somebody in NYC with a lot less money, therefore the person in KS is wealthier.

Posted by: mroberts | March 27, 2008 12:29 AM

Never mind that the ACLU consistently supports Christians and other religious people and groups whose freedom of worship is being curtailed. I found this site w/ a quick search trying to find specific links to examples:

Posted by: Hanspeter | March 28, 2008 5:17 PM

Bleh. Lost the link (darn HTML) http://www.aclufightsforchristians.com/

Posted by: Hanspeter | March 28, 2008 5:36 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com