Now on ScienceBlogs: Lives of the Saints of Science: Darwin

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« McCain Adviser Tied to Rev. Moon | Main | Stein Rewrites Mein Kampf »

Online Gambling Does Not Increase Addiction

Posted on: March 28, 2008 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton

Here's a Youtube video of Howard Shaffer, director of the Division of Addiction at the Harvard School of Medicine, discussing recent research that shows that addiction to gambling has actually gone down while the availability of gambling, especially online, has skyrocketed. Video below the fold:

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

OK, is there something wrong with me? I'm not morally opposed to gambling, just like I'm not morally opposed to cashing your paycheck and using the cash as toilet paper.

It's just that I find gambling so damn boring! Poker, boring. Blackjack, boring. Even those oh-so-clever slot machines, purposefully designed to hypnotize me, and give just frequent enough rewards to keep me playing until Armageddon--boring.

Then again, I actually like to watch fishing shows on Saturday morning TV, so clearly my bore-o-meter is out of whack.

Posted by: James Hanley | March 28, 2008 2:50 PM

2

OK, is there something wrong with me? I'm not morally opposed to gambling, just like I'm not morally opposed to cashing your paycheck and using the cash as toilet paper.

It's just that I find gambling so damn boring! Poker, boring. Blackjack, boring. Even those oh-so-clever slot machines, purposefully designed to hypnotize me, and give just frequent enough rewards to keep me playing until Armageddon--boring.

Then again, I actually like to watch fishing shows on Saturday morning TV, so clearly my bore-o-meter is out of whack.

Posted by: James Hanley | March 28, 2008 2:50 PM

3

To each their own. I love poker, but loathe most other forms of gambling. (I applaud whoever coined the phrase, "The lottery is a tax on people who don't understand mathematics.")

As for fishing shows, man, what is wrong with you? Don't you know those things are addictive and lead to anti-social behavior?

Posted by: Michael Suttkus, II | March 28, 2008 5:30 PM

4

Larry Niven suggested in some of his short stories that, given a readily available, difficult or impossible to ban addictive "substance" (I use that term loosely - the example cited was electrical stimulation of the brain's pleasure center), the potential addicts would tend to eliminate themselves from society, thus from the gene pool.

Obviously, there hasn't been time for the rest of us to outbreed the gambling addicts into non-existence...but is it possible that most of them caught the first wave of Internet gambling, hit bottom, and either sought help or simply dropped out due to poverty before the start of the study?

More likely to my mind, though, is that those vulnerable to gambling addiction were already gambling. Prior to Internet poker or whatever, it wasn't difficult to find a place to gamble - merely more risky and likely illegal, neither of which would stop an addict.

Posted by: BobApril | March 29, 2008 5:24 AM

5

Sorry about the double post. I'm addicted to hitting the post button.

Posted by: James Hanley | March 29, 2008 4:44 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM