PZ posted this Youtube video and I had to put it up here as well. This guy emailed all of the biologists and biochemists named on the list and found that nearly all of them accepted common descent and several of them said they've demanded to be taken off the list. He also points out what many of us have pointed out before, that the DI dishonestly uses different standards for the institutional affiliation of each person on the list. An honest list would use either where they got their highest degree or where they work now, but the DI changes which it uses depending on which sounds more prestigious. Indeed, they seem to use any past affiliation that sounds prestigious, no matter how tenuous (for years they listed Richard Sternberg's affiliation as the Smithsonian, where he neither worked nor got his degree). Video below the fold.
Dispatches from the Culture Wars
Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture
Profile
Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)
Search
Recent Comments
- Modusoperandi on ACLU Defends Christian Students' Anti-Islam T-Shirts
- Left_Wing_Fox on ACLU Defends Christian Students' Anti-Islam T-Shirts
- Moderately Unbalanced Squid on Rhetorical Technique vs Reality
- Joshua Zelinsky on Palin: Limbaugh Lite
- Abby Normal on ACLU Defends Christian Students' Anti-Islam T-Shirts
- Ed Brayton on Rhetorical Technique vs Reality
- Chillidog on Dumbass Quote of the Day
- Modusoperandi on Farah's Recipe for Theocratic Totalitarianism
- Jon Rowe on Farah's Recipe for Theocratic Totalitarianism
- Mike on Rhetorical Technique vs Reality
Recent Posts
- ACLU Defends Christian Students' Anti-Islam T-Shirts
- Dumbass Quote of the Day
- Rhetorical Technique vs Reality
- Obama Contradictions on Civilian Trials
- Palin: Limbaugh Lite
- Sending Dolts to Challenge a Giant
- Farah's Recipe for Theocratic Totalitarianism
- Dumbass Quote of the Day
- Conservatives Endorse Civilian Trial for KSM
- 75% of Senate Republicans Flip on Judicial Filibusters
Blogroll
Science Blogs
- The Panda's Thumb
- Carl Zimmer
- The Austringer
- Evolution Blog
- De Rerum Natura
- Evolving Thoughts
- Preposterous Universe
- Butterflies and Wheels
- John Lynch
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- NCSE's Legal Blog
- Red State Rabble
- Thoughts From Kansas
- Appellate Blog
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Jack Balkin
- Legal Theory Blog
- ACS Blog
- Reason and Liberty
- Overlawyered
- Supreme Court Times
- Positive Liberty
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Andrew Sullivan
- Talking Points Memo
- Daily Kos
- Media Matters
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Classical Values
- Virginia Postrel
- Jim Anderson
- Strange Doctrines
- John Scalzi
- The Pryhills
- Temperantia
- Rev. Spork
- Electric Commentary
- Two Aarons
- Farkleberries
- Paul Phillips
- Henry Neufeld
- Talk.Origins
- Talk.Reason
- Antievolution.org
- National Center for Science Education
- Talk.Design
- Michigan Citizens for Science
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
Other Information
Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb
Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.
Ed's Audio and Video
Declaring Independence podcast feed
YearlyKos 2007
Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement
Audio of Greg Raymer Interview
E-mail Policy
Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.
My Ecosystem Details
« One Giant Cross, Slightly Used. | Main | Sadly Mistaken Post at Pam's House Blend »
An Examination of the DI's Dissent from Darwinism List
Posted on: May 14, 2008 9:09 AM, by Ed Brayton
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More




Comments
I am not surprised. The DI has always = Lying Little Weasel.
Posted by: J-Dog | May 14, 2008 9:49 AM
I saw this video a few days ago. Entertaining, and interesting, but is this old? I thought the DI list was over 700?
Posted by: Vic | May 14, 2008 10:04 AM
Very much like the infamous Frederick Seitz Global Warming petition - filled with nonscientist "scientists" and folks who signed something they knew not what.
What was particularly interesting to me was the careful and dishonest grooming the DI did to rehabilitate the credentials of each signer. Talk about pathetic.
Posted by: Gingerbaker | May 14, 2008 11:25 AM
Posted by: Bobby | May 14, 2008 12:10 PM
Whitney Gray, the fine gent behind this video and a whole series explaining evolution for non-scientists, is a Christian and one of the most intelligent people I've ever spoken to.
Posted by: CBeck | May 14, 2008 1:06 PM
Of the two biologists who deny common descent in any capacity, Clarence Fouche. So I was surprised to find that he is a "FaceRep" for the Morris K. Udall Foundation which was established by the U.S. Congress in 1992.
Posted by: R Hampton | May 16, 2008 9:13 PM
I emailed a scientist who was unwittingly featured on the HIV denial list. He had to fight with them to get his name off.
It's a symptom of having no support for your position.
Posted by: Chris Noble | May 17, 2008 3:20 AM