The Office of Special Counsel was raided this week by the FBI as part of one of the many investigations of wrongdoing by Scott Bloch, the director of the agency that is supposed to protect whistleblowers from reprisals and federal employees from discrimination and political interference. Bloch is a first class butthead and political hack and he is going down like Pamela Anderson at a rock concert.
Profile
Ed Brayton is a freelance writer and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media.(static)
Search This Blog
Recent Comments
- BobApril on Tribute to David Hackworth
- Ed Brayton on My (Partially) Wasted Weekend
- DingoJack on An Amusing Picture of Ignorance
- DingoJack on An Amusing Picture of Ignorance
- Anonomoose on My (Partially) Wasted Weekend
- Skemono on An Amusing Picture of Ignorance
- Skemono on Sestak Calls for End of Don't Ask Don't Tell
- Cherish on How Not to Protest
- Ron Brown on My (Partially) Wasted Weekend
- Brian X on An Amusing Picture of Ignorance
Recent Posts
- Tribute to David Hackworth
- My (Partially) Wasted Weekend
- Islamic Creationist Goes to Jail
- How Not to Protest
- An Amusing Picture of Ignorance
- Ken Miller on Expelled
- Stop Marriott Masturbation!
- Sestak Calls for End of Don't Ask Don't Tell
- Netroots Nation 2008
- FBI Withdraws NSL on Internet Archive
Blogroll
Science Blogs
- The Panda's Thumb
- Carl Zimmer
- The Austringer
- Evolution Blog
- De Rerum Natura
- Evolving Thoughts
- Preposterous Universe
- Butterflies and Wheels
- John Lynch
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- NCSE's Legal Blog
- Red State Rabble
- Thoughts From Kansas
- Appellate Blog
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Jack Balkin
- Legal Theory Blog
- ACS Blog
- Reason and Liberty
- Overlawyered
- Supreme Court Times
- Positive Liberty
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Andrew Sullivan
- Talking Points Memo
- Daily Kos
- Media Matters
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Classical Values
- Virginia Postrel
- Jim Anderson
- Strange Doctrines
- John Scalzi
- The Pryhills
- Temperantia
- Rev. Spork
- Electric Commentary
- Two Aarons
- Farkleberries
- Paul Phillips
- Henry Neufeld
- Talk.Origins
- Talk.Reason
- Antievolution.org
- National Center for Science Education
- Talk.Design
- Michigan Citizens for Science
Archives
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
Other Information
Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb
Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Pilot Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.
Ed's Audio and Video
YearlyKos 2007
Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement
Audio of Greg Raymer Interview
E-mail Policy
Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.
My Ecosystem Details
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Michigan Partnership Benefits Killed by Court | Main | Jewish Students Harassed Over Bible Distribution »
OSC Raided by FBI
Category:
Posted on: May 8, 2008 9:28 AM, by Ed Brayton
View the Technorati Link Cosmos for this entry



Comments
Aw shucks - I read the headline and was hoping the feds were finally taking down Orson Scott Card...
Since we have to settle for second best, my main question is: how has the FBI retained enough independence that they can pursue a high-level Bush appointee so close to the White House, without even a known sex scandal?
Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | May 8, 2008 10:22 AM
The FBI has traditionally retained its independence pretty well, because of its very strong organizational culture. One of the critical moments in Watergate was when Nixon had the CIA tell the FBI to back off the investigation on the grounds that it was a national security issue. IIRC, the FBI didn't (but I'm open to correction of my memory).
Posted by: James Hanley | May 8, 2008 2:46 PM
On Dunford's blog in a comments discussion last week of l'affaire Sternberg, Larry Fa(r)farman claimed "the OSC had no ax to grind" in its report, and "a Congressman issued a report", objective and fair, too. When the characteristics of Bloch and far-right theoCongressman Souder were pointed out to him, Larry announced he knew nothing about them.
"Pontificating From Ignorance" is on the Fa(r)farman family crest.
Posted by: Foggg | May 8, 2008 6:31 PM
I must confess my disappointment that the Sternberg fiasco does not appear to be subject of any FBI investigation.
On the other hand, I wonder why such a bizarre politicization of this group, which is supposed to protect federal workers, was ever allowed to happen. Back in the day, Reaganauts wouldn't have thought of such lack of responsibility.
Posted by: Ed Darrell | May 8, 2008 11:19 PM
Bloch made a splash when he took office by cracking down on agencies that made a policy of not firing employees merely for being gay. He claimed he was acting to enforce federal EEO laws which don't specify sexual orientation, even though the agencies were acting under an executive order signed by Clinton.
However, anyone spending more than five minutes listening to this guy talk about any topic could hardly ignore the Catholic dogma that oozed out of Mr. Bloch's every crevice, permeated his mission and corrupted his official duties.
As for the FBI and Watergate, I think there was sufficient skepticism within the agency because Hoover died just before the break-in and Nixon was free to appoint a loyalist to director. Felt gave Woodward FBI files because the agency was not agressively pursuing the matter, at least, in his opinion.
Posted by: Kudosdc | May 9, 2008 6:37 AM
One will note that, thus far, the pretendsident hasn't said "helluva job, Blochhead!".
Idon't know about "Sternberg" but one of the investigatins the Feebs did mention was that one about Condi Rice using federal funds to fluff Bush during the '04 cycle. The other was investigatin of recently self-shitcanned GSA chief, Lurita Doan. In both cases Bloch gave them clean bills.
Posted by: democommie | May 9, 2008 7:21 AM
"The FBI has traditionally retained its independence pretty well, because of its very strong organizational culture."
Three words: "Slam Dunk"
Posted by: Gingerbaker | May 9, 2008 9:29 AM
As in, proof that the Iraqi's have weapons of mass destruction is a "slam dunk".
How in the world can you claim, James, that the FBI has shown independence?
Posted by: Gingerbaker | May 11, 2008 11:36 AM