Now on ScienceBlogs: The death of Tetrapod Zoology

Enter to Win

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Hitchens Gets Waterboarded | Main | Co-Idiot of the Month? »

Importing Torture from China

Posted on: July 3, 2008 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton

Not only are we importing every imaginable product from China these days, we're also importing their old torture techniques. The NY Times reports:

The military trainers who came to Guantánamo Bay in December 2002 based an entire interrogation class on a chart showing the effects of "coercive management techniques" for possible use on prisoners, including "sleep deprivation," "prolonged constraint," and "exposure."

What the trainers did not say, and may not have known, was that their chart had been copied verbatim from a 1957 Air Force study of Chinese Communist techniques used during the Korean War to obtain confessions, many of them false, from American prisoners.

Of course, there is one obvious difference: when China uses these techniques, we call it torture; when we use them, they are "enhanced interrogation techniques." And China used them against POWs; we use them against "enemy combatants" (because that term is not mentioned in the Geneva conventions, thus absolving us of any need to follow those conventions).

The 1957 article from which the chart was copied was entitled "Communist Attempts to Elicit False Confessions From Air Force Prisoners of War" and written by Albert D. Biderman, a sociologist then working for the Air Force, who died in 2003. Mr. Biderman had interviewed American prisoners returning from North Korea, some of whom had been filmed by their Chinese interrogators confessing to germ warfare and other atrocities.

Those orchestrated confessions led to allegations that the American prisoners had been "brainwashed," and provoked the military to revamp its training to give some military personnel a taste of the enemies' harsh methods to inoculate them against quick capitulation if captured.

In 2002, the training program, known as SERE, for Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape, became a source of interrogation methods both for the C.I.A. and the military. In what critics describe as a remarkable case of historical amnesia, officials who drew on the SERE program appear to have been unaware that it had been created as a result of concern about false confessions by American prisoners.

Senator Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan and chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said after reviewing the 1957 article that "every American would be shocked" by the origin of the training document.

"What makes this document doubly stunning is that these were techniques to get false confessions," Mr. Levin said. "People say we need intelligence, and we do. But we don't need false intelligence."

So why would the Chinese want to deliberately induce false confessions? For propaganda value, of course. They get a captured G.I. to "admit" to being part of a team that was trying to do some horrible thing and then you publicize that the American soldiers admit to doing that horrible thing. Precisely the same reason we use such false confessions obtained through torture, to keep the populace alarmed and afraid and give them the person to blame that fear and alarm on.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1
"What makes this document doubly stunning is that these were techniques to get false confessions," Mr. Levin said. "People say we need intelligence, and we do. But we don't need false intelligence."

Awwww! But false intelligence is always so convenient. How are we ever gonna start a war if we have to rely on dirty old real intelligence?

Posted by: Wes | July 3, 2008 9:58 AM

2

Exactly Wes; can't burn women at the stake on real intelligence. No sir, ya need good old-fashioned, stone-pressed false intelligence for that'un.

Posted by: Julian | July 3, 2008 10:19 AM

3
In what critics describe as a remarkable case of historical amnesia, officials who drew on the SERE program appear to have been unaware that it had been created as a result of concern about false confessions by American prisoners.

Ha! Of course there was no intention to secure false confessions, it's just that all the people involved were total frackin' morons and the possibility never occurred to them. Sure, I'll buy that for a dollar.

What's that? A bridge, you say? Sign me up!

Posted by: Dunc | July 3, 2008 10:25 AM

4

Wait a second... maybe it's because we're using inferior Chinese torture (erm - "enhanced interrogation") techniques that we're getting false information. What we need to do is come up with some good ole' American forms of "enhanced interrogation." That way, we'll know - basking in the glow of self-accomplishment and national pride - that the answers provided by the interrogatee are highly accurate representations of reality.

{/sarcasm}

Posted by: mercurianferret | July 3, 2008 12:36 PM

5

Mercurianferret:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System
As American as apple pie fresh out of grandma's oven; and significantly more painful when applied to skin.

There are no publicly known instances of this little toy being used yet, and it is marketed for crowd control; but using it on restrained prisoners isn't exactly a huge conceptual leap.

I suspect that our cadre of collaborationist psychologists, psychiatrists, and similar have come up with one or two techniques of their own; but flashy hardware is what gets the press releases.

You were joking, they aren't.

Posted by: phisrow | July 3, 2008 12:59 PM

6
when China uses these techniques, we call it torture; when we use them, they are "enhanced interrogation techniques."
I personally favor the old Israeli expression "moderate physical pressure" - it sounds so healthy.

Posted by: tguy | July 3, 2008 8:55 PM

7

tguy: Its a bit like "ethnic cleansing" - how can you be against something so hygienic sounding?

Posted by: James K | July 4, 2008 12:54 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.