Seed Media Group

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a freelance writer and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media.(static)

Search This Blog



Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Pilot Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Facts About ACORN and Alleged Voter Fraud | Main | Voting Rights Victory in Michigan »

NSA Whisteblowers Tell Us the Obvious

Category: Politics
Posted on: October 14, 2008 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton

Two whistleblowers from the NSA have revealed what should have been obvious to anyone paying attention, that the warrantless wiretaps and other surveillance programs went far beyond merely tracking terrorists:

The Senate Select Intelligence Committee is looking into allegations from two U.S. military linguists that the government routinely listened in on phone calls of American military and humanitarian aid workers serving overseas.

"These are extremely disturbing allegations," said Committee Chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., in a statement issued Thursday. "We have requested all relevant information from the Bush administration. Any time there is an allegation regarding abuse of the privacy and civil liberties of Americans it is a very serious matter."

I'm gonna venture a guess here and predict that the White House is going to suddenly lose every email and document related to this subject. Or claim executive privilege and forbid anyone in the executive branch from testifying before the committee. Or invoke the state secrets privilege and do the same thing. Or those two whistleblowers will suddenly retract their stories after a superior at the NSA plays the tapes the agency has of their own private conversations. Or all of the above, not necessarily in that order.

ABC News first reported the charges Thursday, citing one current and one former military linguist by name. They are contained in the book "The Shadow Factory," to be published next week.

The linguists said National Security Agency interceptors routinely monitored and recorded the private calls of U.S. military personnel, Red Cross and other humanitarian workers; personal discussions that had entertainment value -- pillow talk or phone sex --were shared among intercept operators, they said.

Support the troops by listening to their phone sex calls with the wife back home. Very patriotic. Listening in on the Red Cross makes sense, though. The Red Cross is clearly made up of dangerous radicals who believe in crazy ideas like the Geneva Conventions. That can only lead to communist notions like liberty and justice.

Comments

I've heard it said the question is not whether you're paranoid, it's whether you're paranoid enough.

Some friends a few years back learned to speak fluent Klingon, not because they were big Star Trek fans, but just to mess with anyone who might be listening in. Can you imagine the poor NSA agents trying to make heads or tails of those conversations?

Of course that's probably not the best solution for securing your phone sex. A more boner shrinking language I cannot imagine. I once saw Hamlet performed in Klingon at Stony Brook University. All the Viagra in Limbaugh's vault couldn't have helped me that night.

Posted by: Abby Normal | October 14, 2008 10:29 AM

Sadly, the NSA guys I know probably have pretty good Klingon already. These aren't throatcutters; they're mainly math geeks, engineers, and physical scientists recruited and trained to be analysts. They'd have good Elvish and a smattering of Entish. For real security, learn Houyhnhnmese.

ice

Posted by: ice9 | October 14, 2008 11:20 AM

Ed,

not tlhIngan parmaq yajlaH Quch Hab ghajbogh nuv'e'

Posted by tlhIngan qa' Hubwi'


Are responses in Klingon censored, or did scienceblogs just eat mine retroactively?

("A person with a smooth forehead will never understand Klingon love" - Defender of the Klingon Spirit)

Posted by: tlhIngan qa' HubwI' | October 14, 2008 11:48 AM

Lobjan.

Posted by: Who Cares | October 14, 2008 11:50 AM

Is there anyone more full of shiat than Jay Rockefeller?

Posted by: Johnny Clamboat | October 14, 2008 11:58 AM

Who Cares write:

Lobjan.

Is this when you speak Lojban with intentional metathesis?

Posted by: noncarborundum | October 14, 2008 12:08 PM

...the question is not whether you're paranoid, it's whether you're paranoid enough.

Great quote from Strange Days. It certainly sums up how things are going lately.

Posted by: Joy | October 14, 2008 12:29 PM

Thanks for the tip ice9. I'll pass it on. Note I never learned Klingon myself (which made Hamlet particularly surreal). For myself, the NSA can listen to my phone sex all they want, so long as they pay $2.99 for the first minute and $0.99 for each additional minute, like everyone else. ;-)

Posted by: Abby Normal | October 14, 2008 12:52 PM

"These are extremely disturbing allegations," said Committee Chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., in a statement issued Thursday.

Douchebag.

Posted by: Josh in California | October 14, 2008 1:53 PM

For all that this is a blatant invasion of privacy and a waste of taxpayer money, I had to laugh a little.

I used to be a telecomm tech in the USAF and learned (yes, I admit it, by doing) that there is no such thing as a private conversation over any phone line that isn't specifically secured by crypto gear.

There is always some bored operator or tech somewhere listening to some conversation somewhere. Bet on it.

Posted by: twincats | October 14, 2008 5:40 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Hooray for Catholics! 11.19.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. The Wall Street Journal editorial pages are a very silly place 11.21.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Justices to Consider Cert Petition on Citizenship 11.21.2008 · Ed Brayton
  4. Goldberg vs Parker 11.21.2008 · Ed Brayton
  5. Matthew 6:5-8 11.21.2008 · ERV

Search All Blogs