Now on ScienceBlogs: Open Lab PSA

Seed Media Group

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Iraqi Parliament Ratifies SOFA - Kind Of | Main | God and Suicide Prevention in the Military »

More on Florida Anti-Gay Experts

Posted on: December 2, 2008 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton

Pam's House Blend has more information on George Rekers, the anti-gay bigot that the state of Florida used to defend their ban on gay adoption in the state case overturning that ban last week. It turns out Florida is not alone in using Rekers to testify on their behalf in a court case and have the judge remark that he didn't help their case at all:

In 2005, Pulaski County Circuit Judge Timothy White ruled that the state did not have justifiable grounds to keep gays from adopting children.

The Arkansas court specifically said that "Dr. Rekers' willingness to prioritize his personal beliefs over his functions as an expert provider of fact rendered his testimony extremely suspect and little, if any, assistance to the court" and "Dr. Rekers' personal agenda caused him to have inconsistent testimony on several issues."

Second, the post notes that Florida paid him a $60,000 retainer for his work as an expert witness. By comparison, none of the expert witnesses for the plaintiffs in the Dover case were paid for their work, much less a ridiculous amount of money like that. And that happened in the Arkansas case as well, only $60,000 was not enough for Rekers:

Rekers would later sue the state of Arkansas for $200,000 for his testimony but settled out of court for $60,000.

Being a bigot who distorts science to conform to your religious beliefs seems to pay quite well.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

Rekers would later sue the state of Arkansas for $200,000 for his testimony but settled out of court for $60,000.

I'm guessing his lawsuit revolved around allowing himself to ruin his own reputation with his testimony. If the state was competent, no one would realize how bigoted he was.

Posted by: Odie | December 2, 2008 9:53 AM

2

Seriously, how does one get to be an expert witness anyway? Is there any kind of vetting process? If so, what is it, and why wasn't it used here? - Curiously DJ

Posted by: DingoJack | December 2, 2008 10:00 AM

3
Being a bigot who distorts science to conform to your religious beliefs seems to pay quite well.

Being a "scientist" willing to cater to a bigoted agenda roundly dismissed by your peers pays well. I will admit that I have been tempted from time to time to grab the brass ring of "contrarian" science. But I have some integrity.

Posted by: Shygetz | December 2, 2008 10:00 AM

4

The judge of course is a judicial activist. And George Rekers is definitely not gay, of course.

Posted by: reindeer386sx | December 2, 2008 10:08 AM

5

Self-sabotage perhaps? It's possible that someone wanted to lose and hired a blatently obvious bigot to make sure it happened. Or I'm confusing strategy and stupidity, it's florida so it's anyones guess....

Posted by: Ramel | December 2, 2008 10:10 AM

6

Coincidently it's the ruling of an activist judge which allows me to express my feelings about the Florida decision. Hoorah!

Posted by: Abby Normal | December 2, 2008 10:22 AM

7

I absolutely LOVE the idea that Florida picked this guy on purpose to throw the case :-)

Posted by: John K. | December 2, 2008 10:28 AM

8

It's possible that someone wanted to lose and hired a blatently obvious bigot to make sure it happened.

You might be on to something there. He is a blatently obvious bigot, and is absolutely not gay (which goes without saying, of course.) George Rekers is soooooo not gay.

Posted by: reindeer386sx | December 2, 2008 10:43 AM

9
Seriously, how does one get to be an expert witness anyway? Is there any kind of vetting process? If so, what is it, and why wasn't it used here?

Well, anyone can be retained as an expert witness. The question is whether their testimony is admissible. The Daubert standard should give you an idea of how it works.

Posted by: D | December 2, 2008 11:13 AM

10

My father's been an expert witness a few times in securities law cases. I can assure you he was never paid $60k, let alone $200k.

Posted by: Ginger Yellow | December 2, 2008 11:18 AM

11

Ginger Yellow:

I guess that's the beauty of market forces. If you're selling something that people want to buy (in this case, homophobic bigotry) you can command a pretty high price.

Posted by: Chiroptera | December 2, 2008 11:46 AM

12

Not really market forces given that one side of the transaction was the government and that it was a settlement, but point taken.

Posted by: Ginger Yellow | December 2, 2008 12:04 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM