Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dispatches from the Creation Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Dumbass Quote of the Week 3 | Main | Let the Idiotic Rhetoric Flow »

Rick Warren: Shameless Liar

Posted on: April 9, 2009 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton

Pam Spaulding, posting at Pandagon, catches Rick Warren in an absolutely ridiculous lie. On Larry King Live he claimed that he had never, ever endorsed the passage of Prop 8 in California:

es, you know, Larry, there was a story within a story that never got told. In the first place, I am not an anti-gay or anti-gay marriage activist. I never have been, never will be.

During the whole Proposition 8 thing, I never once went to a meeting, never once issued a statement, never--never once even gave an endorsement in the two years Prop 8 was going.

Yeah. Except that he did. On video. In a message to his own church on the church's website. Here's the video:

Does he not realize that video doesn't just disappear because he wants it to? Here's a transcript of the relevant portion:

This is not even just a Christian issue, it's a humanitarian, a human issue, that God created marriage for the purpose of family, love and procreation. So I urge you to support Proposition 8 and pass that word on.

What would Jesus do? I'm pretty sure he wouldn't go on national television and lie through his teeth.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

Thanks for the transcript, Ed -- I was afraid I'd have to actually listen to him.

Posted by: Squiddhartha | April 9, 2009 9:24 AM

2

There is other video out there where Warren also equates or relates being gay to abhorrent practices, so his "I'm not anti-gay" rhetoric makes him some combination of liar and severely deluded; I'm going for both.

Warren tries very hard to present an image that he and evangelicals are main-stream when in fact they'd be main-stream only in a Orwellian-like Christian theocracy. They benefit from the spoils of innovation established with processes they continue to attack and claim are not true.

Besides lying about gays, he's also a huge liar regarding our nation's history and its relationship to religion, along with also lying about science.

Posted by: Michael Heath | April 9, 2009 9:30 AM

3

Like Squiddhartha, I want to say thanks for quoting the relevant portion of the transcript. I'm reluctant to begin videos that may end with me in apoplexy.

Posted by: Moderately Unbalanced Squid | April 9, 2009 9:49 AM

4

"A court of four guys" as he holds up three fingers.

Snort.

Posted by: Spidergrackle | April 9, 2009 9:54 AM

5

The question that immediately comes to my mind is why is he lying? Why is feeling embarrased about Prop 8? And won't such a public denial get him in deep trouble with his core supporters? It is all very strange.

Posted by: Cheddar | April 9, 2009 10:18 AM

6

So Rick Warren is just going where the wind blows. This is a surprise how?

To bad the rest of the 'evangelicals' can't figure it out.

Posted by: yoshi | April 9, 2009 10:19 AM

7

Cheddar, he has to deny his involvement - 3 times - before he can become enlightened.

And as far as his core supporters, if they are like most of the fundies I've had the displeasure of meeting, they have all majored in camel-swallowing in one of their three trips through the 10th grade.

Posted by: Blaidd Drwg | April 9, 2009 10:58 AM

8

"..they have all majored in camel-swallowing in one of their three trips through the 10th grade" is a vicious sterotype, and I know several fine people who might describe themselves as fundmentalists - but I still laughed, darn it.

Posted by: JimV | April 9, 2009 11:15 AM

9

What would be really funny is if a pro- gay marriage advocacy group were to make advertisments wondering if/ suggesting that Warren is all for gay marriage by using the clips where he says that he is not anti- gay or anti- gay marriage.

Posted by: AL Jeremy | April 9, 2009 11:18 AM

10

Reminds me of, "I did NOT have sex with that woman. Monica Lewinsky". Except, of course, that little lie couldn't be easily falsified with a videotape...

Posted by: Adrienne | April 9, 2009 11:18 AM

11

Pandagon quotes Warren saying: "I’m opposed to having a brother and sister be together and call that marriage. I’m opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that a marriage. I’m opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that marriage."

Aren't all of those arrangements in the Bible?

Abraham married his half-sister, Sarah.

Solomon, supposedly blessed with wisdom from God, had many wives.

Not sure about the "child" for a wife, but King David, when he was old, had a beautiful young woman to tend to him and keep him warm at night.

Posted by: Mick | April 9, 2009 11:23 AM

12

Rick Warren promotes a purpose driven life and the purpose of his life is to attach his nose to the ass of whoever holds power. Despite his many faults, you have to recognize that he has a gift for reading the prevailing winds and aligning himself accordingly. He has apparently recognized that the hate driven politics of the fundies wasn't a winning strategy and isn't likely to be in the foreseeable future.

Posted by: Kevin | April 9, 2009 11:35 AM

13

And don't forget Lot having sex with his daughters (oh, but that's okay, because they thought they were the only people left on the planet ... and they weren't married when they did it.... oh wait...).

Posted by: Umlud | April 9, 2009 11:40 AM

14
the purpose of his life is to attach his nose to the ass of whoever holds power ... he has a gift for reading the prevailing winds

I did not need that image this morning, thank you.

Posted by: D. C. Sessions | April 9, 2009 12:30 PM

15

I think the good pastor Warren is learning that talking to choir is different from talking to people that don't already agree with you. Seems to really boggle him that people won't just take his word on things.

Posted by: bdc | April 9, 2009 1:58 PM

16

Yeah, bigamy appears very, very early in the Bible. In Genesis, as soon as the Bible starts listing the descendants of Adam, there's a bigamist just a few generations down, and there is absolutely no moral condemnation whatsoever of it. Polygamous relationships were perfectly acceptable in the OT.

Posted by: AL | April 9, 2009 2:09 PM

17

Liar for Jesus

Posted by: Brando | April 9, 2009 2:15 PM

18
What would Jesus do? I'm pretty sure he wouldn't go on national television and lie through his teeth.

Oh, don't you see, that video is from the synoptic version of Rick Warren. Just because the Book of St. Larry has a differing account doesn't mean that the Gospel as a whole is inconsistent. Oh, heaven forbid.

Posted by: Blake Stacey | April 9, 2009 2:47 PM

19

Rick Warren logic:

Yes, there are bad apples in any bunch, okay? But the presence of counterfeit always implies there must be a real thing. Nobody counterfeits a counterfeit. If there’s a counterfeit out there, it implies, nobody does a counterfeit $4 dollar bill.

Sounds like a two bit hustler to me. That, or brilliant apologetics. One or the other, take your pick!

Posted by: 386sx | April 9, 2009 3:22 PM

20

During the whole Proposition 8 thing, I never once went to a meeting, never once issued a statement, never--never once even gave an endorsement in the two years Prop 8 was going.

Ummmm, the video is pretty much a flat out contradiction with that statement up thar!

"...every culture for five thousand years, and every religion for five thousand years..."

He sure likes that five thousand years number a lot. Gee I wonder why. What a maroon.

Posted by: 386sx | April 9, 2009 3:30 PM

21

Mick:

Abraham married his half-sister, Sarah.

Solomon, supposedly blessed with wisdom from God, had many wives.
Not sure about the "child" for a wife, but King David, when he was old, had a beautiful young woman to tend to him and keep him warm at night.

Numbers 31:18

[Moses said,] ...all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves.

To be sure, the Israelites didn't "marry" the girls, unless you count their enslavement and rape as marriage.

Posted by: David Ratnasabapathy | April 9, 2009 3:47 PM

22
Pandagon quotes Warren saying: "I’m opposed to having a brother and sister be together and call that marriage. I’m opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that a marriage. I’m opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that marriage."

Aren't all of those arrangements in the Bible?

You missed an example of the first one, so here it is: What about Adam and Eve's kids? Weren't no one else around to get it on with except the sibs, and they musta, 'cuz here we all are....

Posted by: Eamon Knight | April 9, 2009 3:58 PM

23

You missed an example of the first one, so here it is: What about Adam and Eve's kids? Weren't no one else around to get it on with except the sibs, and they musta, 'cuz here we all are....

You guys forgot about the demons and the "sons of god" and the "giants" and all those other whatever creatures people used to procreate with back then in the biblical era. (Probably unicorns too. I wouldn't doubt it.)

Posted by: tweety386sx | April 9, 2009 4:04 PM

24

Ahh unicorns. hawt.

On a more slightly more serious note, I think the fact that the new "leader" of the evangelical masses is a opportunistic liar with no principles is a very good thing. It means that they aren't all that fanatical anymore.

Of course the stupid remains but you can't have everything.

Posted by: Coriolis | April 9, 2009 4:59 PM

25

He's pissed off the fundies.

Warren's 'backsliding' on marriage damages church

A Washington, DC, pastor and outspoken opponent of same-sex "marriage" says California mega-church pastor Rick Warren has done "tremendous damage" by apologizing for his support last fall of California's marriage protection amendment.

Rick Warren said Monday on CNN's Larry King Live that he has "never been and never will be" an "anti-gay marriage activist," and made a point to inform the program's host that he apologized to his homosexual friends for comments he made in October to his church in support of Proposition 8 in California.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Church/Default.aspx?id=483576

Posted by: Owen | April 9, 2009 6:51 PM

26

Steven Colbert would be so proud - NAILED!

Posted by: CHV | April 9, 2009 7:37 PM

27

Yanno, I live in Orange County (home of frighteng behemoth Saddleback Church)... would it be wrong of me to just start sending them douchebags in the mail?

Posted by: Briny Deep | April 9, 2009 10:43 PM

28

He didn't say he's not anti-gay, just that he's not an anti-gay activist. He even explains what that means -- it means he doesn't go to meetings.

So why don't you people just lighten up?

Posted by: Gary Carson | April 11, 2009 12:11 PM

29

Gary Carson:

WTF are you smoking these days? Whatever it is, send me a sample.

Posted by: democommie | April 11, 2009 1:19 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.