Now on ScienceBlogs: Spirited Debate with Ray and Kirk

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Greatest Poker Story Ever? | Main | The (Steak) Battle is Joined »

Outed Blogger Sues Sheriff's Department

Posted on: May 10, 2009 9:02 AM, by Ed Brayton

The blogger in Jacksonville, Florida whose identity was outed to the church he attended and criticized is suing the sheriff's department and prosecutor's office over having his name revealed to the church despite the investigation finding no wrongdoing on his part.

A formerly anonymous blogger who criticized his prominent Southern Baptist pastor has sued police and state prosecutors for revealing his identify to the church even though an investigation showed he had done nothing illegal.

Tom Rich and his wife Yvette, until recently members of First Baptist Church in Jacksonville, Fla., for about 20 years, filed a lawsuit April 27 claiming that involvement by government officials violated his rights under the First Amendment of the Constitution.

More details:

Rich started his blog after noticing differences in preaching style, fundraising and church administration between Mac Brunson, who became pastor of the Southern Baptist megachurch in 2006, and his predecessor, Jerry Vines, who retired in 2005.

Rich created the blog anonymously, he said, to encourage open and honest dialogue without getting into personalities.

Last fall Robert Hinson, a police officer and First Baptist member who also serves as a member of Brunson's security detail, opened a criminal investigation into the blog at the request of church leaders. He subpoenaed Google and Comcast to find out who owned the blog.

After closing the investigation, Hinson told the church that Rich was the author. The church then issued trespass warnings against the Riches. Not allowed on church premises, the couple sought out a new church.

Rich claims the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office investigation and subpoena issued by Assistant State's Attorney Steven Siegel violated his right to free speech, which includes the right to speak anonymously.

He also alleges that the investigation violated the First Amendment clauses that prohibit the establishment of religion and guarantee free exercise of religious beliefs.

The lawsuit alleges the criminal investigation was "fabricated to create the illusion of legitimacy" but really was "a mere pretext for the discovery and disclosure" of Rich's identity to the church.

By investigating the blog, the lawsuit says, Hinson, "acting under color of state law, spent taxpayer money and government time prosecuting an errand of the church and in so doing acted as an extension and enforcer for a particular religious entity."

The lawsuit claims the actions were "deliberate and malicious" and served "no governmental interest." It seeks damages in excess of $15,000.

I hope he wins and wins big.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

Robert Hinson and Steven Siegel should be disciplined or fired for using their offices and authority to engage in a religious vendetta

Posted by: Kevin | May 10, 2009 9:40 AM

2

Was it a case of steeplejacking to begin with?

Posted by: Coturnix | May 10, 2009 9:49 AM

3

Whatthehell kind of pastor requires a "security detail"? This is not the kind of Christianity I used to practice.

Posted by: Eamon Knight | May 10, 2009 9:55 AM

4

Hopefully he'll win big and get his story publicized in the mainstream media portraying the legacy of this right. One example by the framers was publishing The Federalist Papers under pseudonym. I'm sure there are other even more appropriate examples from that time given the authors didn't attempt to remain permanently anonymous like this plaintiff might have intended.

Posted by: Michael Heath | May 10, 2009 10:08 AM

5

I think his damages amount is missing a couple of zeros.

Posted by: Ferrous Patella | May 10, 2009 11:58 AM

6

Civil R.I.C.O. allows an award for treble actual damages or punitive damages (but not both). Of course, this type of Abuse of Process is crying out for Criminal R.I.C.O.

Posted by: kehrsam | May 10, 2009 12:26 PM

7

Am I the only one who thinks the First Amendment argument isn't the strongest legal argument he could be making? Maybe he should tack on due process and search and seizure violations.

Posted by: FishyFred | May 10, 2009 2:00 PM

8

@FishyFred:

Implicit in a 1st Amendment argument is a due process claim (since there's no way to apply the 1st to the states without it). Also, I'm fairly certain his lawyer is going to argue everything that's relevant. I'm going to guess an article written by "Associated Baptist Press" didn't spend a lot of time hashing out the legal argumentation.

Posted by: Brock | May 10, 2009 3:07 PM

9

Any idea if he's got a legal defense fund? If so, I'd like to contribute.

Posted by: lauram | May 10, 2009 4:46 PM

10

I'm still curious as to how they ever got a subpoena.

Posted by: Ace of Sevens | May 10, 2009 5:55 PM

11

Possible reason for subpoena, according to this post at Tom Rich's blog:

http://fbcjaxwatchdog.blogspot.com/2009/04/times-union-jso-and-fbc-jax-troubling.html

Weak link to criminal activity: The church was concerned about stolen mail and photos taken of the pastor's wife. But linking them to a critical blogger seemed a stretch. While the blogger's posts were critical, they did not appear to justify a police investigation.

Posted by: Monimonika | May 10, 2009 6:27 PM

12

Oh, nevermind, what I just posted was already mentioned in the news article.

Also, I'm not sure where I read this, but not only was there no police report filed about the "stolen mail" and "photo taking" incidents, but that the investigation records themselves are now gone due to routine throwing out of old case notes after a certain number of months/days(?). Convenient, huh?

Posted by: Monimonika | May 10, 2009 6:45 PM

13

By the way, if you ever want to start an anonymous blog and keep it that way, make sure it's truly anonymous.

Posted by: Tor | May 10, 2009 7:03 PM

14
Whatthehell kind of pastor requires a "security detail"?

I wondered the same thing as soon as I read that as well.

What concerns me the most is that a church somehow convinced a government official to begin an investigation at all.

Posted by: Pi Guy | May 11, 2009 8:42 AM

15

The government official (police officer) was a member of the church, that's how. Not a conflict of interest at all.

Posted by: Dugglebogey | May 11, 2009 2:58 PM

16

Larry Sinclair lost his fight to try to find out the identities of some bloggers. Why did comcast give the info?

Posted by: sus | May 12, 2009 9:07 AM

17

I think Mac Brunson should step down as pastor of First Baptist. This is clearly a case of SIN! Bringing dishonor to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and His Church is WRONG! This will catch up with all who are involved in this SIN. Unless, there is true repentance. The First sign would be Mac Brunson and the other Church leaders to step down and 'GET OUT OF THE WAY'. Or the Church should wake-up and take care of the SIN!!! If this continues Jesus will 'LEAVE' First Baptist Church. Then it will be a 'DEAD, GOOD FOR NOTHING!' Church.

Posted by: David Walters | May 16, 2009 1:47 PM

18

Does anyone know the church's email addresses? I would LOVE to send them some emails in addition to the snail mail. Security detail my ass. Sounds like a Benny Hinn in the making.

Posted by: Daxx-Terry Green | June 2, 2009 10:20 AM

19

出会いを求める男女の為の無料出会いサイト-恋人探し-

Posted by: 出会い | June 15, 2009 5:01 AM

20

公式出会い系では地元~全国までの出会いをお届けします!

Posted by: 出会い系 | June 18, 2009 6:01 AM

21

メル友募集者の為の無料サイト★メル友募集無料サイト【スウィーツ】★

Posted by: メル友 | June 25, 2009 12:13 PM

22

「公式メル友探し無料サイト」では優良メル友サイトを最新版でご紹介しております♪

Posted by: メル友 | June 26, 2009 5:24 AM

23

素敵な出会い系ならこちらで♪

Posted by: 出会い系 | July 27, 2009 3:04 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM