Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of 
Mark Tapscott has a profoundly silly column in the Washington Examiner throwing a temper tantrum over Vice President Joe Biden using the phrase "Jesus Christ" in an insufficiently reverent manner in an interview. Here's what Biden actually said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal about Iran getting nuclear weapons:
"I can see Putin sitting in Moscow saying, 'Jesus Christ, Iran gets the nuclear weapon, who goes first?' Moscow, not Washington."
And that's enough to send Tapscott off into the loonisphere, his cup filled to overflowing with feigned outrage.
I have no idea what the vice president believes about Jesus. What I do know is that he apparently thought nothing of taking the name described in Holy Scripture "as the only name given under Heaven by which men are saved" and used it the same way most people routinely use the words "damn," "hell," and others unfit to print in a family newspaper.Having myself uttered such words on too many occasions, I can hardly fault Biden if this particular incident was simply an unintentional slip of the tongue. One would assume that if such was the case, Biden would have by now offered an apology.
But there is no indication on the public record that he has since recognized the offensiveness of what he said and apologized or otherwise sought to make amends. Queries to Biden's spokesmen went unanswered yesterday.
So the question must be asked: Did Biden intend to offend millions of his countrymen who worship Jesus, one of whom happens to be his boss, or did he just not care if they were offended?
And then he plays the "no one ever insults the Muslims" card:
Either way, had Biden used the name Mohammed in this manner, Muslims would be crying foul. Quite possibly rioting in the streets, to boot. And if the vice president had used "gay" or "Black" as swear words, folks would be rightfully angry about that, too.
But none of those things would fit in the context of what he said. Like it or not, no one in this culture has ever used "Mohammed" the same way we frequently use "Jesus Christ" as an expression of exasperation. That's certainly because Islam is a tiny minority religion in this country, while Christianity is the dominant religion.
The use of "Jesus Christ" in that manner has almost certainly been done precisely because it's such a strong expression in the face of a dominant Christian culture. That's precisely why profanity exists and why it is used to express stronger-than-usual feelings, because it is saying something viewed as taboo by the dominant popular culture.
But here's where he goes completely off the rails, by calling its use hate speech:
Hate speech is hate speech, whether it is aimed at Christians, Muslims, Gays, or African-Americans. Whether or not it should prosecuted or, as Thomas Jefferson argued, left undisturbed as a monument to tolerance and the strength of rational argument is a different issue. Here, it is sufficient to note that hate speech is speech meant to demean, ridicule, and discredit all who are associated with its target.So where is the outrage about Biden's hate speech against Christians? We've not heard a peep of protest from the Southern Baptist Convention. Nothing from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Nothing from the Presbyterian Church U.S.A. Nothing from the United Methodist Church.
And neither have we heard from Biden's boss, whose spokesman had other things to do yesterday than discuss another veep flap. Obama did have time last week to comment on the quality of law enforcement in Cambridge, Massachusetts, but his vice president's offensive language doesn't rate a public comment this week.
God damn it, Tapscott, do you really think that Biden used that phrase because he intended to "demean, ridicule and discredit" all Christians? If so, you're a fucking idiot. He used it because it is a very common, almost cliche, expression of exasperation in American culture. You may not like that fact, but since you admit to using it yourself "on too many occasions" you certainly should recognize that the use of that phrase does not indicate an intent to demean or ridicule Christians.
You didn't mean it that way all the times you used it, did you? So why would you assume that someone else does? I suspect it's because if you did recognize this obvious fact it would undermine your ability to work up all that faux outrage you've got going.
And then there's this bizarre statement:
What is more interesting here is the silence of American Christianity. Like the silence of the hound that caught Mr. Holmes' attention, this one signifies something far more serious at work in the American body politic.Biden's uncorrected cursing is indicative of the slow strangling by the unrelenting forces of political correctness of the religious tolerance that is Christianity's greatest gift to America.
Wow. Double wow. Jesus Fucking Christ on roller skates. Religious tolerance is Christianity's greatest gift to America? What planet does this guy live on?
Politics
Comments
Ed:
After reading Tapscott's CV, I would say he's an idiot, and a partisan hack and a lying sack of shit--without bothering to read anything he's ever written. He was Asst. Managing Editor of the Washedup Times for fuck's sake. I'd say he's right about even with the Worldnut's staff.
Posted by: democommie | August 3, 2009 9:21 AM
Ahem, the proper phrase is "Jumping Jesus on a Pogo Stick," as made famous by the incomparable Dead Milkmen.
Posted by: James Hanley | August 3, 2009 9:25 AM
Obviously, this anger is misdirected. Biden was quoting a hypothetical Putin reaction. He should be mad at Putin for offending millions of Americans and all that other stuff.
Posted by: Odie | August 3, 2009 9:29 AM
James Hanley:
"Jumping Jesus on a pogo stick" is so, "old blasphemy". I tend to go with "Simpering Jesus in a polka dot pinafore" when dealing with the KKKristian anti-teh GAY crowd.
Ahhhh, just got Townes Van Zandt doing "Dead Flowers" on the shuffle. Suhweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet!
Posted by: democommie | August 3, 2009 9:29 AM
By Jove! What is this jumpin'-jehosephat issue all about anyway? That one mortal used a deity's name in a manner that is somehow seen by another mortal as desecratory? By Hotoke, but who the fuck cares? I mean, St. George smite me if I'm wrong, but who is a mere mortal to know what is right and wrong when it comes to their own almighty being? May Ahuramazda find Tapscott's soul unfitting to even be thrown to Ahriman, and that Apollo's chariot grind his worthless bones to ash. I mean, by Odin's fucking beard and one eye! Where's that Mohammad-cursed, Allah-damned babbler going to say next? Jesus H. Christ!!!!
Posted by: John | August 3, 2009 9:38 AM
As I noted somewhere else this dust-up was mentioned, my preferred exclamation in the genre is, "Sweet Zombie Jesus on a pogo stick!"
I'm fairly certain I stole it from 8-Bit Theater, a good source of humor for anyone with stabbity urges.
Posted by: Ranson | August 3, 2009 9:45 AM
Democommie,
Well, I do have a personal fondness for "Jesus Buttfucking Christ," or "Jesus Cocksucking Christ." Nothing seems to offend the Christers more than implying that a guy who spent almost all his time in the company of other men might have had a hardon for one of them.
Posted by: James Hanley | August 3, 2009 9:47 AM
James - Of course, though, people rarely wrote about women, so it could also be that all of these men enjoyed the company of many women. Of course, too, there's nothing to say that the big JC had a fondness for the yang over the yin... I mean, how are we to know, since no one seems to have written (or included) any notes about how Jesus (or any of his buddies) liked to get - well - "Biblical".
Posted by: John | August 3, 2009 9:52 AM
Someone help me out here, but I believe one of the non-canonical gospels does state in pretty clear terms that Jesus had sex with his favorite disciple? Not that those others have more historical validity than the four canonical gospels, but I seem to remember that this version did exist.
Posted by: Scott Hanley | August 3, 2009 10:11 AM
I wonder what the backstory is.
Posted by: Foggg | August 3, 2009 10:17 AM
Religious tolerance...the reason the word oxymoron exists.
Posted by: Richard Eis | August 3, 2009 10:23 AM
This is especially silly since Jesus Christ is a fictional fairy tale character. No different from a Smurf or a Transformer.
But Smurfs and Transformers sure are a hell of a lot more fun than Jesus Christ.
And, oh yeah, they do not cause the war, destruction and oppression that Jesus Christ does.
That silly Jesus! What hijinks will he get involved in during this week's episode? ; )
Posted by: Bill | August 3, 2009 10:43 AM
The Internet being the wondrous place that it is, a Google image search will readily turn up pictures of Jesus Christ on a pogo stick, or tapdancing on a cracker. The results of "Jesus fucking Christ" are NSWF....
Posted by: abb3w | August 3, 2009 10:55 AM
Wait wait wait, hold on here. Isn't the response of panties-in-a-bunch offense exactly the hallmark of political correctness? Isn't the act of enforcing arbitrary language standards in an effort to avoid offense the very definition of political correctness?*
So how the hell can it be that "political correctness" is the evil cause behind this horrible behavior, and yet the proper response to this behavior by the offended is to apply political correctness? Why does he think PC is the proper bogeyman to invoke, but not recognize that it's also his own ideological weapon?
* From Wikipedia: "Political correctness (noun) and politically correct (adjective) (PC) are the terms applied to language, ideas, policies, and behaviour meant to enforce ideologic conformity to an orthodox authority."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness
Posted by: Flavin | August 3, 2009 11:03 AM
I posted this once (more or less), but it went into the lostpost oubliette of doom.
John:
"... I mean, how are we to know, since no one seems to have written (or included) any notes about how Jesus (or any of his buddies) liked to get - well - "Biblical"."
Nobody wrote about JESUS and his manly longings?
au contraire:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamb:_The_Gospel_According_to_Biff,_Christ%27s_Childhood_Pal
And, Bill @ #12, it's okay, it's a fantasy too, although much more of a fun read than the four accepted gospels.
Posted by: democommie | August 3, 2009 11:08 AM
Who but xians use the expression anyway?
Posted by: Tom | August 3, 2009 11:08 AM
Eff Xenu, this is a stupid controversy.
Posted by: kehrsam | August 3, 2009 11:16 AM
I usually go with "Jesus Herbert Walker Christ!" myself.
And I'm especially fond of the "All Christians are offended, except for the Baptists, Catholics, Presbyterians, Methodists, and everyone else who seems to think it's a non-issue".
Posted by: chancelikely | August 3, 2009 11:28 AM
There is
http://www.jesusfuckingchrist.org/
but the site is down at the moment.
Posted by: dean | August 3, 2009 11:34 AM
I prefer the simple, "christ on a stick" which makes me think of popsicles.
Posted by: Rational Behavior | August 3, 2009 11:34 AM
Does anyone else recall Mark Twain's story about the time he was a lad working setting type for a flyer advertising one of those christian revival meetings? He claims that he ran out of space and so abbreviated "Jesus Christ" as "J.C." The preacher demanded the flyer be redone with the "full name" of the Lord and Saviour, so Twain replaced "Jesus Christ" with "Jesus H. Christ." Then if I recall correctly he left town...
Posted by: Ron Kephart | August 3, 2009 11:51 AM
Dean - Well that's definitely going on my favorites list! - :) DJ
Posted by: DingoJack | August 3, 2009 12:05 PM
Jesus HUSSEIN Christ, missing be thy birth-certificate!
Posted by: jpf | August 3, 2009 12:23 PM
Didn't the TREASONOUS Bush call the US Constitution
"A Goddamned Piece of Paper".
Blasphemy AND Treason.
And the reaction from the "christian" "right"?
**crickets***
Posted by: Arn Gunnutes | August 3, 2009 12:27 PM
@24: Apparently not. All links led to the same, unconfirmed source.
Posted by: mark | August 3, 2009 12:51 PM
I believe its Jumping Jesus on a pogo stick (said like one is shocked).
Posted by: jeremy | August 3, 2009 1:14 PM
@24
Agrees with 25 - there is no proof that Bush ever said it. Like many idiotic right wing myths about Obama - this is one the left wings.
I was raised Catholic and went through confirmation. Hell (pun intended) I taught sunday school for a couple of years. But as an atheist I have found more than a few times that when I throw out an 'Oh God' or 'Jesus Christ' (which I do often as habit) they site it as proof that I am still a believer. Its all rather ridiculous.
Posted by: yoshi | August 3, 2009 1:22 PM
Biden's uncorrected cursing is indicative of the slow strangling by the unrelenting forces of political correctness of the religious tolerance that is Christianity's greatest gift to America.
Tapscott had better never get anywhere near a military base.
Posted by: Shay | August 3, 2009 1:22 PM
jbf (#23) wins the thread.
Posted by: Sadie Morrison | August 3, 2009 1:25 PM
I tend to take heed of the common Christian claim that everyone is afraid to insult Muslims at its word so, in order to correct that, I use the phrase "Sweet Jesus jumped up Allah".
Posted by: AL Jeremy | August 3, 2009 1:28 PM
9) Steve - Yep, that's in the Secret Gospel of Mark. This is generally considered a forgery because no copies are known less than about a century old. Of course, none of the canonical gospels were actually written by the authors attributed to them, the names were attached later by tradition to give them authenticiy.
Jesus Christ isn't a name anyway. Jesus is a name, a corrupted form of Yeshua that's been Romanized to Joshua and so on. Perhaps everyone named Joshua/Jesus/etc should be excommuicated along with their parents for blasphemy to please Mr. Tapscott.
Christ is a title accorded by believers, not a name at all. It was cheaper to give a title instead of giving a raise in pay even 2000 years ago.
Posted by: Rob Jase | August 3, 2009 1:40 PM
"Jesus jumped-up christ on a popsickle stick" is the one I most often use.
Agreed Sadie, jbf wins.
Posted by: Brad | August 3, 2009 1:44 PM
Sorry, meant jpf wins.
Posted by: Brad | August 3, 2009 1:47 PM
This is absolute crap. If one really wants to get down to it the thing they sight in the Bible they say backs up this bullshit is where it says to not use the Lord's name in vain. What most do not know because they do not bother to study what the shit they tout as fact actually means, is that name of the lord often means reputation more than like our sir names. In other words, it is saying do not use my reputation in vain. This means that when some Christians say "God said" every other word they are more in violation of this than some guy cussing. Those that are perceived by non-Christians as real assholes and the reputation of God is destroyed because of it are guilty of this as well when they associate themselves with Christ by calling themselves Christians. The guy who wrote this article qualifies as a religious asshole for even caring if Biden cussed. Thus, he is the one using the Name of the Lord in vain.
Posted by: King of Ireland | August 3, 2009 1:49 PM
I've also heard "Jesus H. Christ at the Tastee-Freez," which I kind of like. (What would He have there, I wonder?)
Posted by: Dave M | August 3, 2009 2:04 PM
Regarding the "He would never say Mohammed as an expletive" argument, while that is true, it is not at all difficult to imagine Biden having used "Holy Moses!" as an expletive.
It appears to me that Tapscott's primary beef is that people are less afraid of getting FUCKING MURDERED by Christians than they are afraid of getting murdered by Muslims. Well. Okay then. Duly noted.
Posted by: James Sweet | August 3, 2009 2:23 PM
Tapscott stated:
So in other words, he ignores the usage of this word completely outside the culture that perpetuates its usage where he'll then defeat a strawman of his own manufacture. For the record, VP Biden is a Catholic who grew up in an area, Scranton PA, filled with Irish Catholics where this is the vernacular even for devout Catholics.
Some Protestant sects do despise the use of this phrase when its not used to refer to their god. If Tapscott has a problem with Biden's casual use of the term, blame the culture that promotes its usage along with Biden; to not do so shows what an opportunist and chicken-shit Tapscott is.
Posted by: Michael Heath | August 3, 2009 2:24 PM
Biden was referring to, actually asking a question of, Jesus (pronounced Hay-sus) Crist, born out of wedlock Hispanic son of Charlie Crist of Florida. Biden has never gotten the hang of the proper pronunciation. Jesus Christ is an expert on international relations, nuclear weapons and the middle East and would be just the man to turn to on such questions. He also, just so happens, is known to enjoy both bouncing on a pogo stick, and rollerskating. Often arriving at high level meetings on a pogo stick of roller skates. Except that time after he fell off, broke his leg and used a crutch.
Posted by: Art | August 3, 2009 2:45 PM
Or, given his locale, perhaps Fig and Goat Cheese Swirl (although I'm kinda partial to the Bourbon and Cornflake Ice Cream myself).
Posted by: James Hanley | August 3, 2009 2:51 PM
Jesus Christ in frozen ice STILL MAKES A SCENE!
Posted by: ews | August 3, 2009 3:38 PM
You all are like children. Each of you going further with the religious cursing, seeing if you can outdo each other on offending people's sensibilities. Why don't you use the N-word too? Like 10 year olds, you are.
The article in question is a bit too pompous, I agree. On the other hand, there are standards of behavior in the adult world. We expect our politicians to be respectful and well-spoken. We expect our car mechanics to drop f-bombs. What is so hard to understand about that? why is it remarkable?
You know what's REALLY DUMB? The whole I-can-yell-louder-than-you-can nature of political blogging these days. Biden's bidenism was remarkable but not worth an entire column. The column was not worth a response, certainly not one filled with cuss-words and 4th-grade one-upmanship.
By responding and engaging in this shouting match, you are the very thing that allows Mark Tapscott to continue to exist. You and he are particle and anti-particle. Look closely, you'll see it.
Ok, go ahead and swear at me now.
Posted by: You're So Eloquent | August 3, 2009 3:40 PM
Wouldn't you just dread seeing JC walk into your ice-cream parlour? Imagine what he'd do if you'd run out of his favourite flavour.
Posted by: SimonG | August 3, 2009 3:48 PM
Only cowards are afraid of words.
Posted by: jws | August 3, 2009 4:11 PM
You're so eloquent - Ed's noting what the Washington Examiner printed will not promote Tapscott's career. It does provide notice to Ed's readers that the Washington Examiner's editorial decisions are not to be trusted. It's bloggers like Ed providing perspective on absurdities like this that help provide perspective to those of us who also read straight news. Traditional media outlets, and some of their readers, still do not get why their publications are going down the tubes.
For example, given the recent explosion of untrue assertions getting printed in the Washington Post since the WaPo hired Fred Hiatt as its editor of the editorial pages, I've been looking to other straight news publishers for D.C. news. When I read this blog post I asked myself what kind of idiot would publish Tapscott's stupid diatribe, stupid in both topic covered but especially the lack of cogency of the argument. I then wiki'd the Washington Examiner and discovered they recently hired as their online editor Mary Katherine Ham, a known far right propagandist. Any publisher who would hire a known propagandist . . . well, it's no surprise we see articles by Tapscott like the one Ed blogs about here.
So now I boycott the Washington Times, the WaPo, and the Washington Examiner. This Leaves only the Washington Independent and The Hill for local inside the beltway, news sources.
Posted by: Michael Heath | August 3, 2009 4:17 PM
Lighten up!
Jesus H. Christ
Posted by: Jesus | August 3, 2009 4:39 PM
Jesus on a jet-ski: brings new meaning to walking on water
Posted by: mediajackal | August 3, 2009 4:43 PM
You're So Eloquent - Now you did criticize Cheney when he dropped the f-bomb in public right? You are aware of this precedent right?
And of course, you must be against preachers who give imprecatory prayers, pretty much all do, aren't you? Talk about taking the lord's name in vain.
Posted by: Rob Jase | August 3, 2009 4:43 PM
You're so eloquent:
Okay. Fuck off.
Posted by: democommie | August 3, 2009 4:43 PM
Jesus H. Christ on a crucifix? Would that work for everybody?
Posted by: mediajackal | August 3, 2009 4:50 PM
"Like 10 year olds, you are."
Like Yoda, you write.
Posted by: Taz | August 3, 2009 4:51 PM
If there's ever an Islamic theocracy on our very doorstep with nuclear weapons at its disposal, you'd better believe I expect our politicians to curse like sailors.
Posted by: DaveL | August 3, 2009 4:51 PM
People who require that much reverence for their imaginary friends and all associated trappings are really too fragile for the real world.
Posted by: Buffy | August 3, 2009 5:01 PM
You're So Eloquent:
Haven't you ever heard of Lenny Bruce? The only reason words have power is because we give it to them. By treating words like they have all this power over us, we give in to them. The reason comics like Lenny (and George Carlin, and others) would swear is to draw attention to this. Watch the movie "Lenny", about his life, and you can see two famous routines of his (as recreated by Dustin Hoffman). One where he said "did you cum good?" over and over again, giving it a sort of rhythm -- its just a series of sounds, in the end. It's foolish to give words this sort of power over our lives, as if they were magic spells that will bring ruin to our lives.
That's why everyone is adding their own variation in on "Jesus Christ". Because it doesn't matter. They're only words -- and for anyone to write a whole column on the subject is absurd, but only slightly more absurd than anyone getting upset about it in the first place.
Posted by: Sean Michael | August 3, 2009 5:08 PM
@Michael Heath #44: I agree completely with your post but wanted to add this:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/
I find McClatchy is one of the few newspaper organizations to do real investigative reporting, occasionally.
Posted by: Brad | August 3, 2009 5:56 PM
Brad - thanks for the link, I'll bookmark it in my news bookmarks folder. My post happened to be focused only on media physically located within the D.C. beltway, I do follow federal news at other sources as well.
McClatchy, located in Sacramento, CA, owns a number of newspapers, one of which is the Anchorage Daily News. The ADN did an awesome job covering Gov. Palin and after her announced candidacy, I stopped by their website daily until after the election. They knew Palin's character well before her being picked for VP, which is one more bit of empirical evidence that McCain's campaign was clueless regarding her utter incompetence and lack of character.
McClatchy's site had a good article on the debate in Congress regarding extending the cash for clunkers program.
Posted by: Michael Heath | August 3, 2009 7:08 PM
YSE, why don't you come out and admit that what's really eating at you is the blasphemy inherent in this thread?
Posted by: Sadie Morrison | August 3, 2009 7:14 PM
Thank you, Sadie Morrison:
Who's the the leader of the club that's made for the reichwing?
YSE, YEC; F-U-C-K-E-D!
Posted by: democommie | August 3, 2009 8:30 PM
Oh, you people want offensive Jesus references? OK here's a good one:
http://fuck-the-skull-of-jesus.mit.edu/
It's even illustrated...
Posted by: Troy Britain | August 3, 2009 9:26 PM
I'm fond of Sweet Zombie Jesus myself, but New Zealand's too secular for blasphemy to be fun anyway.
Posted by: James K | August 4, 2009 1:40 AM
This column cries out for a link to loljesus.com.
Yuck it up!
Posted by: Ratel | August 4, 2009 3:18 AM
Sean Michael -
"That's whole point. If President Kennedy stood up and said these are all the niggers in my cabinet, if he said "nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger" ...
then a little boy on the playground couldn't call a little girl a name, and make her cry. I'm Lenny Bruce, goodnight." - DJ
Posted by: DingoJack | August 4, 2009 3:50 AM
"The first human who hurled an insult instead of a stone was the founder of civilization." (Sigmund Freud)
Oh, and: Jesus Fuckin' Christ on a pogo stick dildo!
Posted by: Marko | August 4, 2009 5:15 AM
"Christians, Muslims, Gays, or African-Americans"
I like the way these are separate groups. I guess that is because a christian can't be a muslim or a gay and an african-american certainly can't be a true christian.
Hang on.
Posted by: Captain Obvious | August 4, 2009 8:53 AM
This cartoon is also rather amusing (it helps if you've seen Silence of the Lambs)
http://www.farleftside.com/2009/7-15-09.html
Posted by: dean | August 4, 2009 11:58 AM
I know Mark Tapscott. I worked with Mark Tapscott* (and actually learned some stuff from him, but that's another story). You, Ed Brayton, are no Mark Tapscott.
So breathe easy, will you?
More seriously: Tapscott left the Moonie Times a long time ago, and hid out with the Heritage Foundation for some years. He ran a blog, Tapscott's Copy Desk for a while:
http://tapscottscopydesk.blogspot.com/ (go look at his profile description there)
Tapscott was one of those Capitol Hill Lifers who made it out of Bob Bauman's office before Bauman imploded, and leapt to the Senate side with Sen. Orrin Hatch. But sometime after he left the Hatch office, he took a turn to the right and went bad.
Of all people, I'd have expected Tapscott to have caught the humor in Biden's inserting a "Jesus Christ" in the mouth of Vladimir Putin.
Let that be a warning to all parents everywhere: Mommas don't let your kids grow up to be arch-conservatives; they'll lose their sense of humor and most other sense of perspective.
* Seriously, in Orrin Hatch's office. That's another story for another time. When your senator says he needs your help on state issues . . . well, I'm not from Utah any more. And if I get back there ever, it will multiply the number of wilderness supporters and users.
Posted by: Ed Darrell | August 6, 2009 6:10 PM
'You know what's REALLY DUMB? The whole I-can-yell-louder-than-you-can nature of political blogging these days'
41: Posted by: You're So Eloquent
Well that capitalized statement was the darn loudest thing I have seen on the internet. My ears will be ringing for at least another 5 minutes do to my rather loud asthmatic induced laughing.
Posted by: theroachman | August 6, 2009 6:51 PM
the roachman:
"You're So Eloquent" is a strikingly goofy blognomen. Does it mean to say (of the writer) "While I'm just a garden variety moron"?
Posted by: democommie | August 6, 2009 9:12 PM
HMMM. Charles Gooberlicker Darwin on a short sword.
There, that's better!
Tenderfoot Terdlicker Darwin ona Spartan Spear
Anal Apparition of darwin
Fecal Flinger Felcher Darwin on a Oscar Myer hot dog
Liver lillied lopsided liberal left latvia lonesom and lavished by a lover with lingering diesease
That liberal has a bigger asshole that homo coming from a fudgepacker convention.
Sodomite Sphicter Spasm of the darwinian eclipse.
Had enough? Want more? See I can do it too.
Posted by: Pull my finger dammit | August 6, 2009 10:41 PM
Pull my finger dammit -
Yes, yes you can, you're just really, really bad at it. Go away and get some practice (20 or 30 years should just about suffice), then come back and tell me all about it. - DJ
Posted by: DingoJack | August 7, 2009 1:50 AM
DingoJack:
I'm guessing this is the same shit-for-brains fuckhead who left a couple of equally intelligent comments on the "Worse than Chinese Force Abortion" thread.
That he's a fairly pissed off young feller is not a secret. He tries for that totally illiterate snopesian meme, but he misses because he actually spells some words correctly. His "All Caps" key is apparently not working and his alliterative rhyming abilities are suggestive of someone who was aggresively home-schooled.
He's probably just lonely and would like someone to play with.
Don't pull his finger by the way, but if you really would like to help him, pull his head out of his ass.
Posted by: democommie | August 7, 2009 7:49 AM
Just remember this quote... "at his Name your knee will bow"
Posted by: Sam R | September 20, 2009 5:39 PM
Blasphemy..
I truly believe in Jesus Christ. There are no athiests'
in foxholes is very true.(Vietnam Vet..)
I do not push My Saviour onto non-believers and Blasphemy
is the ultimate sin.
MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON YOU ALL.
I have studied all of the issues that you bring up.
If I am wrong then you have nothing to lose. If
I am right, you have eternity to pay for. "There is no ice machine in hell". J-Bro..>
Posted by: J-Bro | June 6, 2010 10:47 PM
Your Jesus Christ doesn't exist as a deity. If you are insulted by this and consider it blasphemy, I really don't care.
Except for the fact that there are plenty of atheists in the military. This is a documented fact, and you are incorrect.
The entire point of this post of yours is to push your version of "god" onto everyone else.
What a truly original argument you have here! Let's see how convincing it is when I do it: I say that if you don't believe in the existence of invisible flying pink unicorns, that you'll go to hell. "If I am wrong then you have nothing to lose. If I am right, you have eternity to pay for."
So are you now convinced that invisible flying pink unicorns exist? Aren't you too scared NOT to believe in them yet? Nope... didn't think so.
Wow... you somehow managed to make a factually correct statement. Of course, there is no ice machine in hell, merely because there is no hell to begin with.
Posted by: doctorgoo | June 6, 2010 11:08 PM
This reminds me of the idiots in my old church that would shame you if you "did not stand up for righteousness" and give someone cussing shit about it. I do not think cussing is that high up on the list of things God hates.
Posted by: King of Ireland | June 6, 2010 11:21 PM
Ahem - he clearly said "athiests" - those who are so athy that none can be athier. You know, people who are extremely reminiscent of this Irish village.
Posted by: DaveL | June 7, 2010 5:47 AM