Here's an even better sign from the gay rights march a couple weeks ago than the first one.

Now on ScienceBlogs: Lives of the Saints of Science: Darwin
Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture
Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)
Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb
« A Good Ol' Fashioned Book Burning | Main | Mikey Weinstein Gets Mail »
Posted on: October 23, 2009 9:30 AM, by Ed Brayton
Here's an even better sign from the gay rights march a couple weeks ago than the first one.

Find more posts in:
Politics
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
Comments
Somebody has some graphic design talent. Nicely done.
Posted by: MikeMa | October 23, 2009 10:11 AM
whether you agree or not this is funny
Posted by: eve | October 23, 2009 10:13 AM
Spot on! Écrasez l'infâme! (Voltaire)
Posted by: Pastor Bentonit | October 23, 2009 11:34 AM
My inner punctuation pedant notes that he has missed out the apostrophe from can't.
Posted by: JohnM55 | October 23, 2009 1:33 PM
I saw that one when I was at the march and it made me chuckle.
Posted by: Tony P | October 23, 2009 1:56 PM
Tony P,
A lot of signs from the march were linked on an earlier thread, many of them well done. I hope the efforts are well rewarded.
Posted by: MikeMa | October 23, 2009 2:33 PM
This is only tangentially related to the post, but god, I miss "Arrested Development."
Posted by: Sadie Morrison | October 23, 2009 2:34 PM
This would have been so much better if the dumbass could punctuate.
Posted by: Daniel Kolle | October 23, 2009 6:36 PM
Hmmm ... perhaps he meant:
or
or
Which do you think? :) - Grammarnazi
Posted by: DingoJack | October 23, 2009 9:33 PM
I think the protester just forgot the comma and quotation mark: '"...why", cant I? (see DJ's "cant^1, #4)
It's really more about existential angst than SSM.
Posted by: MikeG | October 23, 2009 10:48 PM
Dang. Don't drink and post, kids.
The quote from the sign I was going for was:
'If Liza can marry two gay men, why?' cant I.
Marry one.
And now that I see it, I think it's tome for bed.
Posted by: MikeG | October 23, 2009 10:51 PM
Something to do with happy little bluebirds, maybe?
Posted by: bemusedoutsider | October 24, 2009 3:52 PM
Maybe Liza's "just a gal who cant say no". :) -DJ
Posted by: DingoJack | October 25, 2009 1:26 AM