Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dispatches from the Creation Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« C Street House No Longer Tax Exempt | Main | Georgia Man Held Without Trial for 4 Years »

Classic Worldnutdaily Misinformation

Posted on: November 18, 2009 9:02 AM, by Ed Brayton

I laughed out loud when I read this headline:

worldnetdaily headline23.jpg

Yes, Harry Reid has "fast tracked" the nomination of Judge David Hamilton. Hamilton was nominated on March 17th, for crying out loud. He was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee by a 12-7 vote on June 4th. Since that time, the Republicans have been filibustering his nomination - and doing so based on some rather ridiculous lies about Hamilton's record. The same Republicans who screamed holy hell about any filibuster of a Bush judicial nominee, railing about how "unprecedented" it was and considering the "nuclear option" of doing away with such filibusters.

Let's not forget this statement by Republican judiciary committee member Jon Kyl swearing that no Republican would EVER filibuster a nominee because they were just so gosh darn principled:

"Republicans seek to right a wrong that has undermined 214 years of tradition - wise, carefully thought-out tradition. The fact that the Senate rules theoretically allowed the filibuster of judicial nominations but were never used to that end is an important indicator of what is right, and why the precedent of allowing up-or-down votes is so well established. It is that precedent that has been attacked and which we seek to restore....

My friends argue that Republicans may want to filibuster a future Democratic President's nominees. To that I say, I don't think so, and even if true, I'm willing to give up that tool. It was never a power we thought we had in the past, and it is not one likely to be used in the future. I know some insist that we will someday want to block Democrat judges by filibuster. But I know my colleagues. I have heard them speak passionately, publicly and privately, about the injustice done to filibustered nominees. I think it highly unlikely that they will shift their views simply because the political worm has turned."

So now Reid cuts a deal with Sen. Mitch McConnell to finally get Hamilton a vote by the full Senate -- a vote that he will win handily -- a full 8 months after he was nominated and nearly 6 months after his nomination was sent to the floor, and in the fevered minds of the folks at the Worldnutdaily, the nomination is being "fast tracked." It becomes more and more difficult to parody these people.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

Ed - your URL got cut-off so it's not going to the page you want but instead returning an error message.

Posted by: Michael Heath | November 18, 2009 9:11 AM

2

Wow, I love how they use, "nominee claimed primay job to 'write footnotes to the Constitution'" as if it were something horrendous. That phrase strikes me as a fairly apt (and conservative, in the non-political sense) view of the role of the federal judiciary.

Posted by: Dave | November 18, 2009 9:12 AM

3

The content is not really important at WND, just scary, evil sounding headline. Its like giving a rawhide chew toy to a dog. The dog, in my experience, loves it regardless of the shape or size or flavor. I realize I insult dogs by comparing them to WND readers but I'll apologize in advance for any offense in that regard.

Posted by: MikeMa | November 18, 2009 10:28 AM

4

"anti-Jesus, pro-abortion judge"

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Posted by: Michael Drake | November 18, 2009 10:32 AM

5

Cue every Republican filibuster for the last 155 years. -DJ

Posted by: DingoJack | November 18, 2009 10:55 AM

6

It's time to make them sing for their supper. Bring back the rule where you have to actually filibuster (e.g. talk non-stop, read telephone books, etc) in order to filibuster!

Posted by: dcsohl | November 19, 2009 1:47 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.