Now on ScienceBlogs: Let the War on Christmas Begin. Atheist style.

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Appeals Court Denies Justice to Torture Victim | Main | Off to the Nation's Capitol »

Good Riddance to a Racist Jerk

Posted on: November 5, 2009 9:30 AM, by Ed Brayton

CNN reports:

A Louisiana justice of the peace who drew criticism for refusing to marry an interracial couple has resigned, the secretary of state's office said Tuesday.

Keith Bardwell resigned in person at the Louisiana secretary of state's office, said spokesman Jacques Berry. The state Supreme Court will appoint an interim justice of the peace to fill Bardwell's position, Berry said, and a special election will be held next year to fill the position permanently.

But he's still clueless:

Bardwell, speaking to CNN affiliate WBRZ, said he was advised "that I needed to step down because they was going to take me to court, and I was going to lose."

"I would probably do the same thing again," he said. "I found out I can't be a justice of the peace and have a conscience."

No, you dolt. You found out that you can't have a job that requires you to perform legal duties and then refuse to perform those duties when they conflict with your racism. Welcome to reality. Maybe one day you can join the rest of us in the 21st century.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

He's only concerned for the children of the inter-racial couple. Isn't it reasonable that the offspring would suffer terribly and live a horrible life because of prejudice?

I don't know of any good example of a mixed-race person being even modestly successful in life. Well, there is that one guy who's president...

Posted by: Audrey | November 5, 2009 9:36 AM

2

I predict that: Bardwell will get an even more lucrative job as a right-wing radio bloviator, and make a very comfortable living pretending to be a victim of Northern liberal bigots; and his replacement as JP will be a slightly less obvious racist jerk.

Posted by: Raging Bee | November 5, 2009 9:43 AM

3

Now they need to go after the idiot that let him pull this shit.

Posted by: democommie | November 5, 2009 9:57 AM

4

Hey, he's just trying to protect those kids from people like him. Give the guy a break!

Posted by: Philbert | November 5, 2009 10:00 AM

5

Isn't it a provision of one of the civil rights acts that if, under color of authority you violate another person's civil rights that you (personally) can be held liable for money damages?

I believe that it would serve the public good for there to be a consequence for this schmuck beyond just losing his job and public humiliation.

Posted by: Preston | November 5, 2009 10:03 AM

6

Of course if Bardwell claimed it was his religious conviction that mixed race couples should not be married, that would be another kettle of fish.

Posted by: The Moiety | November 5, 2009 10:12 AM

7

I don't know of any good example of a mixed-race person being even modestly successful in life. Well, there is that one guy who's president...

And then there's some golfer. Oh, yeah, there are several actresses....

Posted by: gwangung | November 5, 2009 10:20 AM

8
I don't know of any good example of a mixed-race person being even modestly successful in life. Well, there is that one guy who's president...

There's another guy who's the captain of the champions of baseball. Jerek Deter! Yeah, that's it.

Posted by: FishyFred | November 5, 2009 10:25 AM

9

And another guy who's been modestly successful at his sport - someone named Woods.

Posted by: Taz | November 5, 2009 10:26 AM

10

Preston @5,
What public humiliation? He's getting high-fives at the club where the only blacks are there to clean up after. He hasn't admitted that he did anything wrong, only that he would lose in court. Odd sentiment for a justice.

Posted by: MikeMa | November 5, 2009 10:29 AM

11

"They was going to take me to court." I love it.

Posted by: Solly Hofman | November 5, 2009 10:55 AM

12

because they was going to take me to court, and I was going to lose

Guess what? They is still taking you to court and one hopes you is gonna lose big-time.

Posted by: Shay | November 5, 2009 10:57 AM

13

In all seriousness, though--the whole "I'm worried about biracial kids having a hard time [from racists like me, no doubt]" is of a kind with the concern-trolling homophobes who insist their worry is that gay kids are greater risks for depression and suicide. Well, no shit--bigots like you insist on drilling their evilness and ungodliness into their skulls constantly, so can you be surprised?

Posted by: Solly Hofman | November 5, 2009 10:58 AM

14

MikeMa @10 Then I really hope my vague memory of one of the civil rights acts allowing civil liability for rights violations is correct. I realize this couple probably doesn't need a set of sheets with eye holes, a poster of David Duke and some loose change but it's important for their to be a consequence.

Posted by: Preston | November 5, 2009 11:13 AM

15
In all seriousness, though--the whole "I'm worried about biracial kids having a hard time [from racists like me, no doubt]" is of a kind with the concern-trolling homophobes who insist their worry is that gay kids are greater risks for depression and suicide.

it's along the same lines as the, "We can't let gays in the military because straight guys in the military might discriminate against them."

Really? Your argument is that we can't have equal rights because doing so will piss off the bigots?

Posted by: dogmeatib | November 5, 2009 11:56 AM

16

Preston @14,
Me too. The idea that this bigoted asswipe will just walk away from a lifetime (assumed >1 but 1 is too many) of civil rights violations sucks.

Bardwell doesn't exist in a vacuum. If the environment did not condone his actions, he would not have existed at his post for as long as he did. Public shaming would be more useful than a fine or jail but I don't think they'd allow use of stocks, even in LA.

Posted by: MikeMa | November 5, 2009 12:09 PM

17

I'm glad the guy resigned.
I wonder how many of you have ever really talked to a mixed race person about what they experience? Things might not be quite as good as you hope. But then, people in the majority assuming other groups don't have it bad has always been a problem.

Posted by: rnb | November 5, 2009 12:50 PM

18

I wonder how many of you have ever really talked to a mixed race person about what they experience? Things might not be quite as good as you hope. But then, people in the majority assuming other groups don't have it bad has always been a problem.

As someone in an inter-racial marriage with mixed-race relatives, I can say that there are certainly problems, but, as others have pointed out, the problems are mainly that racist assholes give them grief, and it's not for other racist assholes to decide for the mixed-race folks whether to run that risk.

Posted by: CJColucci | November 5, 2009 1:11 PM

19

"Really? Your argument is that we can't have equal rights because doing so will piss off the bigots?"

Dogmeat, this is precisely what I hear whenever a politician mentions "political capital" when the subject of gay civil rights comes up.

"We can't do what's right!! Think of the cost!!"

Posted by: Rick R | November 5, 2009 1:15 PM

20

Really? Your argument is that we can't have equal rights because doing so will piss off the bigots?

"WE CAN'T STOP DISCRIMINATING AGAINST THEM, OR ELSE WE WON'T BE ABLE TO PROTECT THEM AGAINST OTHER PEOPLE WHO MIGHT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THEM!!!"

Posted by: FBI Regional Bureau Chief GORDON COLE!!! | November 5, 2009 2:04 PM

21

Keith Bardell:


"I would probably do the same thing again," he said. "I found out I can't be a justice of the peace and have a conscience."



Huck Finn:
But that's always the way; it don't make no difference whether you do right or wrong, a person's conscience ain't got no sense, and just goes for him anyway. If I had a yaller dog that didn't know no more than a person's conscience does I would pison him. It takes up more room than all the rest of a person's insides, and yet ain't no good, nohow.

In both individuals, the person's "conscience" encourages them to be racist. But the no-account rapscallion rejects most of the racism of the culture he grew up in, even while surrounded by such racism. The former justice of the peace retains his racism, despite it dying in the culture around him.

Posted by: llewelly | November 5, 2009 2:14 PM

22

rnb:

Are you serious? I have many acquaintances and some friends and family in mixed race relationships. It's only a problem when they have to deal with dickheads who don't think they're quite as human. Fuck racists.

Posted by: democommie | November 5, 2009 2:28 PM

23
I wonder how many of you have ever really talked to a mixed race person about what they experience? Things might not be quite as good as you hope. But then, people in the majority assuming other groups don't have it bad has always been a problem.

I'll ask my kids...

They say: it's not a problem.

Posted by: heddle | November 5, 2009 2:34 PM

24

IMO, the guy's isn't too bigoted to be a JP; he's too stupid.

It's one thing for him to think "These two? Sheesh." It's another for him to share his thoughts with the happy couple--without them once passing through the part of his brain that edits private opinions from those that might be fruitfully shared with others.

This result--him losing his job in a cloud of public ridicule--couldn't have been more predictable once the story hit the media. Bigots may call this sort of public disapproval "political correctness," but most of them are at least sharp enough to recognize that it exists. Bardwell is too dumb for even that.

Posted by: Molly, NYC | November 5, 2009 2:47 PM

25

What public humiliation? He's getting high-fives at the club

Have you seen a full photo of Bardwell? I doubt he's privy to many high-fives.

Posted by: Loren | November 5, 2009 3:15 PM

26
I wonder how many of you have ever really talked to a mixed race person about what they experience?
My wife and her siblings don't seem to have had many problems in life. And that's even with their dad having been invited to join a fraternal organization if he'd ditch his mixed-race wife. Turns out she hasn't had many problems, either. Nor have my kids.

So, how many mixed-raced people have you talked to personally?

Posted by: James Hanley | November 5, 2009 4:48 PM

27
I wonder how many of you have ever really talked to a mixed race person about what they experience? Things might not be quite as good as you hope. But then, people in the majority assuming other groups don't have it bad has always been a problem.

I talk to myself all the time ... might be why I get all the strange glances... ;o)

For me it is more of an annoyance because I can rather easily pass for white though I don't want to. On the other hand I get to hear racist comments about my ancestry including the time my cousins were referred to as squaw, "forrest nigger," spear chucker, etc. I also have to deal with idiots who think because I look white I am white, who assume I don't know anything about discrimination, who think I'm just some "rich white kid" (ROFL rich) who feels guilty about the "red man," and other bullshit.

Nothing compared to people who can't "pass," but still an annoyance at times.

Posted by: dogmeatib | November 5, 2009 6:58 PM

28

Following this guy's logic, anyone who is already of mixed race is not permitted to get married, as their children would be (by definition) also of mixed race, and thus would be discriminated against (for example, by people who'd refuse to let them get married).

Whee! Disenfranchisement for all! Or some, at any rate.

Posted by: Snoof | November 5, 2009 7:48 PM

29

It's funny that people only consider color when discussing "mixed-race" issues. The difference between an Irishman and an Anglo-Saxon vs. that Irishman and a Nigerian is just a matter of degree. I would bet money that dumbfuck EX-judge is an impure mixture of European "races" at least. I am mostly German/French and if it weren't for being informed by family of a tiny percentage of Arab, from a few generations back, I would never guess in my life that I was anything other than a whitebread Euro-mutt.

Also, my maternal grandmother was widowed shortly after her first child, my mother, and married a wonderful man, from an American base in Germany, by the name of Rudolf Sanchez, with whom she had four more children, eventually ending up at Fort Sill. Each of them is more successful, both socially and financially, than my "pure" bred immediate family.

It's guys like this that *almost* make me wish there really was a grand Liberal/Atheist/Satanist/Muslim/Jewish/Reptilian/WTF? conspiracy to eat white, xian babies.

Posted by: chrstphr | November 5, 2009 9:20 PM

30
I wonder how many of you have ever really talked to a mixed race person about what they experience? Things might not be quite as good as you hope.

I'll be sure to ask my nieces and nephews if they think other people should have decided whether or not their parents should have fucked.

P.S. Wtf is wrong with you?

Posted by: Leni | November 6, 2009 2:41 AM

31
Following this guy's logic, anyone who is already of mixed race is not permitted to get married, as their children would be (by definition) also of mixed race, and thus would be discriminated against (for example, by people who'd refuse to let them get married).

Snoof,

I know that there is a provision, I believe in Florida, that wont allow Native Americans to adopt kids. Don't know if it is actually enforced anymore, etc., but it was still on the books two or three years ago. So this situation where a group of people are denied rights isn't limited to this jackass.

Posted by: dogmeatib | November 6, 2009 8:55 AM

32

Oh cripes. What's this guy's problem? I mean, what century does he think he's living in? Even in Louisiana. People who think this way shouldn't ever be allowed to administer laws of any kind; they're incapable of administering them unless the laws in question conform to their outdated beliefs.
Anne G

Posted by: Anne Gilbert | November 6, 2009 6:14 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM