Matt Taibbi has a provocative post on his blog that I'm not sure I agree with, but it contains some really amusing and well-written elements. Basically, he declares Sarah Palin to be Rush Limbaugh for those who can't even handle the kind of discourse Limbaugh lays out. I think he does rather overstate Limbaugh's credibility, however, in this bit:
The reason for that is that poor Rush is an anachronism, in the sense that his whole schtick revolves around talking about real political issues. And real political issues are boring.Listen to Rush any day of the week and you'll hear him playing the old-fashioned pundit game: he goes about the dreary business of picking through the policies and positions and public statements of Democrats and poking holes in them, arguing with them, attacking them with numbers and facts and pseudo-facts and non-facts and whatever else he can get his hands on, honest or not, but at least he tries. The poor guy nearly killed himself this summer trying to find enough horseshit to arm himself with against the health care bill, coming up with various fairy tales about how state health agencies used death panels to try to kill cancer patients who just wanted to live a little longer, how section 1233 is Auschwitz all over again, yada yada yada.
Rush is no Einstein, but the man does research. It may be fallacious and completely dishonest research, but he does it all the same. His battlefield is world politics and most of the time the relevant action is taking place in Washington. As good as he is at what he does, he still has to travel to the action; he himself isn't the action.
I think that's overstated a bit. The kind of research Limbaugh does is the kind of research done by those who originate all those breathless viral emails your inbox is littered with. It's not genuine research, it's just a shallow search for even the tiniest and most insignificant thing that he can blow up and exaggerate and manufacture faux outrage with.
But I think he's essentially correct to say that Palin is operating at an even lower level than that:
Sarah Palin's battlefield, on the other hand, is whatever is happening five feet in front of her face. She is building a political career around the little interpersonal wars in the immediate airspace surrounding her sawdust-filled head. And in the process she connects with pissed-off, frightened, put-upon America on a plane that's far more elemental than the mega-ditto schtick.Most normal people cannot connect on an emotional level with Rush's meanderings on how Harry Reid is buying off Mary Landrieu with pork in the health care bill. They can, however, connect with stories about how top McCain strategist and Karl Rove acolyte Steve Schmidt told poor Sarah to shut her pie-hole on election day, or how her supposed allies in the McCain campaign stabbed her in the back by leaking gossip about her to reporters, how Schmidt used the word "fuck" in front of her daughter, or even with the strange tales about Schmidt ordering Sarah to consult with a nutritionist to improve her campaign endurance when she herself knew she just needed to get out in the fresh air and run (If there's one thing Sarah Palin knows, it's herself!).
Complaining about the assholes we interact with on a daily basis is the #1 eternal pastime of the human race. We all do it, and we get to do it every day, because the world is full of assholes. Me personally, I waste an enormous amount of time seething over people who get onto crowded subway cars with big backpacks on and/or talk in the Amtrak quiet car and/or drive 57 mph in the fast lane or, my personal favorite, walking with glacial slowness in a horizontal row four overweight tourists across on a New York City sidewalk. We all get into furious arguments at work that make us want to explode in self-righteous fury (in my office dramas I always realize I was actually the asshole a day or so later) and when we get home from work, this is usually what our loved ones hear about for at least the first hour or so.
Not health care, not financial regulatory reform, not Iraq or Afghanistan, but -- assholes.
Sarah Palin is on an endless crusade against assholes. It's all she thinks about. She doesn't really have any political ideas, in the classic sense of the word -- in fact the only thing resembling real political convictions in Going Rogue revolve around the Trans-Alaska pipeline and how awesome she thinks it is.
Most of the rest of the book just catalogs her Gump-esque rise to national stardom (not having enough self-awareness to detect the monstrous narcissistic ambition that in reality was impelling her forward all along, she labors in the book to describe her various career leaps as lucky accidents or mystical acts of Providence) and the seemingly endless parade of meanies bent on tripping her up along the way. The book is really about her battles with these people, how much they did and do suck, and how difficult and inherently unfair life is for a decent hardworking American gal who just wants to live life, serve God, and try to be president without being bothered all the time...
Palin's extraordinary ability to inspire major national controversies around these injustices done to her immediate person is going to guarantee her some kind of major role in American politics for the next dozen years. In this regard she is going to have a willing ally in her supposed keen enemy, the mainstream media, which likewise loves nothing more than a political narrative that has nothing to do with politics. It'll be a virtually endless war over nonsense like this latest Newsweek cover, which hilariously is being seen as one or the other of a) a liberal media plot or b) a sexist assault on a prominent female politician by the male-dominated media world when in fact, as all of us in this dying print media business know, the magazine's motive was grounded entirely in the nihilistic desperation to sell newsstand copies.
And Sarah Palin sells copies. She is the country's first WWE politician -- a cartoon combatant who inspires stadiums full of frustrated middle American followers who will cheer for her against whichever villain they trot out, be it Newsweek, Barack Obama, Katie Couric, Steve Schmidt, the Mad Russian, Randy Orton or whoever. Her followers will not know that she is the perfect patsy for our system, designed as it is to channel popular anger in any direction but a useful one, and to keep the public tied up endlessly in pointless media melees over meaningless nonsense (melees of the sort that develop organically around Palin everywhere she goes). Like George W. Bush, even Palin herself doesn't know this, another reason she's such a perfect political tool.
Hard to argue with any of that.

Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of 



Comments
Hard to argue but depressing for the fact that he predicts at least a dozen years of this twit rather than the 15 minutes she's already burned through.
Posted by: MikeMa | November 25, 2009 9:39 AM
how difficult and inherently unfair life is for a decent hardworking American gal who just wants to live life, serve God, and try to be president without being bothered all the time...
This is outstanding.
Posted by: Odie | November 25, 2009 9:48 AM
The notion that Limbaugh does his own research is horseshit.
He's got staffers to do it for him, plus look at Rush's ditto-cam shots on any given day. The PC monitor to his right almost always has Drudge on screen whom Limbaugh uses during his breaks to reload on talking points, and/or refill his candy dish (located just out of frame) filled with various pharmaceuticals.
Posted by: CHV | November 25, 2009 9:53 AM
Half the time I'm not sure how Sarah Palin even functions on a daily basis. She's that dumb. She genuinely does, actually, make Malkin and Limbaugh look like Einsteins.
That is how dumb she is.
Posted by: Katharine | November 25, 2009 9:54 AM
Most of the other half of the time is wondering how in the fuck this woman is in the same species I am.
Posted by: Katharine | November 25, 2009 9:56 AM
There's a demotivator for that: http://despair.com/dysfunction.html
Posted by: Tacroy | November 25, 2009 10:02 AM
Luckily America is a meritocracy, right? Right?
Posted by: Modusoperandi | November 25, 2009 10:05 AM
I'd pay to see La Palin in the WWE. Hell, I'd pay a lot to see her in a pay-per-view adults-only wrestling venue. Opponents?
Posted by: CJColucci | November 25, 2009 10:08 AM
His description of Palin is spot-on, and may be summarized in two words:
Drama Queen.
Rt
Posted by: Roadtripper | November 25, 2009 10:11 AM
I disagree with the very last sentence. George W. Bush was no genius, definitely not smart enough to be president, but he wasn't the bumbling illiterate fool he played on TV. I've met the guy, he can actually string words together in the correct order. And he did have his own ideas now and again. Sarah Palin, on the other hand, is nothing but an empty shell. I suppose it's just a matter of magnitude. Bush would have gotten somewhere without his family name, probably in local Texas politics. But Palin would be a Walmart greeter if she didn't have the sexy librarian thing going on and if she had any opposition for governor besides a sapient caribou.
Posted by: Brandon | November 25, 2009 10:40 AM
This shouldn't be that surprising. Limbaugh views are actually have a knowledge level that is on the upper end according to this Pew study: http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/319.pdf . They have better background knowledge than CNN watchers and have almost as good background knowledge as Daily Show watchers (the difference is just barely statistically significant). We might bash Limbaugh all the time but he is aiming at an audience that does have a lot of facts on hand (even if they interpret many through a very skewed lens supplemented by many non-facts). That's way out of Palin's league.
Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | November 25, 2009 11:11 AM
I have to agree with Joshua Zelinsky here. I remember how excited many of my colleagues in politics were when Rush's radio show came to DC in 1989. At the time, the excitement was deserved. He discussed policy with more insight than most reporters, and he was really, really funny. He truly had no competition in what he did other than Paul Harvey, who sucked.
Rush lost all credibility because of Bill Clinton. Prior to that, he could criticize Bush I as well as Congressional democrats. Afterwards, his whole focus was on Bill and Hillary. Neither as interesting, nor as factual. After 20 years, he has none of what made him so good then, nor has he devleloped any new skills to replace them: He's just a shill for a brain-dead party. Which makes him an intellectual tower of strength compared to Bible Spice.
Posted by: kehrsam | November 25, 2009 11:36 AM
I often wonder where some of these people would end up if it weren't for politics or family money. Looking around my past workplaces for similar types, my guess is that most of them would be incompetent middle managers whose subordinates hate them. Think, The Office.
Posted by: Troublesome Frog | November 25, 2009 12:13 PM
I think what he meant when he said Limbaugh does research is that he doesn't pull everything out of his ass. Now and then he draws from something that actually exists in the real world outside his fevered brain. To some people, that's what 'research' means.
As a pedestrian example, you can find on The Intertubes that humans cannot digest chlorophyll and that humans can digest chlorophyll. See? Research.
Posted by: Nattering Nabob of Negativism | November 25, 2009 1:03 PM
Troublesome Frog, I've often thought W would have been an excellent used-car salesman or restaurant waiter. He's not completely without talent.
Posted by: Scott Hanley | November 25, 2009 1:23 PM
Scott @ 15:
>>>I've often thought W would have been an excellent used-car salesman or restaurant waiter.
As long as the restaurant in question served very basic foods with easy to pronounce names that Dubya can't mangle. God help him if he ever had to list vichyssoise as being among the night's specials.
"And for soups tonight we've got...ah, we've got, uh....vichy-sour...vichy-somethin'...aw, hell, let's just call it chicken noodle, huh?"
Posted by: CHV | November 25, 2009 2:40 PM
She is the country's first WWE politician
HARDLY
Posted by: Juice | November 25, 2009 3:40 PM
There is no equivalence between Mr. Bush and Ms. Palin. I'll go to the mat with anyone to argue that Bush was the worst President in the history of the U.S.A. (if one's yardstick is the aggregated net gain/cost during their administration, including future implications).
From that perspective there isn't a close second. However, from summertime 2008 forward, especially during the debates and credit crisis it became quite clear that Sen. McCain would be a far worse president than Mr. Bush; that the Palin VP nomination wasn't an exception to the rule, it validated it.
Ms. Palin on the other hand thinks we should all say the Pledge with great zeal, including 'under God', because Her only objection is why there isn't a law prohibiting everyone who doesn't at least adore her from participating in its recital.
Posted by: Michael Heath | November 25, 2009 5:00 PM
If there is a distinction to be made between Palin and Limbaugh (and I'm not convinced there is), it would be that Palin appears slightly more sincere in her beliefs than Limbaugh, whom I consider to be more of an opportunist than a true believer.
Posted by: Sadie Morrison | November 25, 2009 5:06 PM
W would be the head guy at the second biggest State Farm agency in Midland and chief greeter and back-slapper at the Rotary.
Posted by: natural cynic | November 25, 2009 5:37 PM
That Pew Study that Joshua Zelinsky linked to is from 2007. I'd kinda like to see a new one.
Rushbo is a lying sack of shit, a drug addict, a serial divorcee and guy whose only major concerns are how to increase his personal fortunes and get whatever sort of personal gratification he currently seeks.
Palin is a bimbo, a clever bimbo, but a bimbo nonetheless.
Posted by: democommie | November 26, 2009 8:47 AM
I don't really buy this. Rush has enjoyed tremendous success in rural America and among working-class whites for the better part of two decades; much of what he rambles about is inherently political. Misinformed and flat-out wrong, but political. Many, and I would wager most, of his loyal listeners do not fully understand the context of his rants, nor do they have an accurate picture in their minds of how the political process works, but they trust him blindly because he is allegedly one of them (even though he's demonstrably not). He's a fraudulent tribal hero.
Posted by: Sadie Morrison | November 26, 2009 8:57 AM
Dudes, Limbaugh and Beck are dropouts. They don't have degrees. They're morons.
Why anyone isn't saying this to further discredit them, I don't know.
Posted by: Katharine | November 27, 2009 11:49 AM
Katharine: I don't know if you're aware of this, but their fans don't seem to be big on schoolin'. If anything, a lack of credentials would give them more cred.
Posted by: Modusoperandi | November 27, 2009 5:00 PM
Indeed, Modusoperandi. I know there's been at least one program this past summer (I can't be more specific than that, sorry) in which Beck trotted out his lack of scholastic credentials as a card signifying his rank amongst the superhuman.
Posted by: Sadie Morrison | November 27, 2009 6:46 PM
Beck is a sterling example of Nietzsche's stupimensch.
Posted by: Modusoperandi | November 27, 2009 6:51 PM