FunnyOrDie has an amusing video in response to Kirk Cameron's crusade to hand out 50,000 copies of The Origin of Species with a creationist introduction. Video below the fold.
Dispatches from the Culture Wars
Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture
Profile
Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)
Search
Recent Comments
- Sadie Morrison on The End is Near (Again)!
- dontregret on The End is Near (Again)!
- hje on Utah Legislature Shows Scientific Ignorance. Again.
- Taz on FRC: Criminalize Homosexuality
- axilet on Klingenschmitt Don't Like No Gays in the Military
- Michael Heath on Farah v Breitbart
- gwangung on FRC: Criminalize Homosexuality
- dogmeatib on Utah Legislature Shows Scientific Ignorance. Again.
- llewelly on TMLC Files Another Frivolous Lawsuit
- Molly, NYC on Klingenschmitt Don't Like No Gays in the Military
Recent Posts
- Farah v Breitbart
- Klingenschmitt Don't Like No Gays in the Military
- The Shelby Hold Gets Worse
- Utah Legislature Shows Scientific Ignorance. Again.
- TMLC Files Another Frivolous Lawsuit
- Pat's Super Bowl Commercial
- FRC: Criminalize Homosexuality
- Religious Right Wigs Out Over a Toy
- Republican Senator Pulls Off Rare Double Backflip of Hypocrisy
- Weigel Clarifies O'Keefe Story Recollections
Blogroll
Science Blogs
- The Panda's Thumb
- Carl Zimmer
- The Austringer
- Evolution Blog
- De Rerum Natura
- Evolving Thoughts
- Preposterous Universe
- Butterflies and Wheels
- John Lynch
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- NCSE's Legal Blog
- Red State Rabble
- Thoughts From Kansas
- Appellate Blog
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Jack Balkin
- Legal Theory Blog
- ACS Blog
- Reason and Liberty
- Overlawyered
- Supreme Court Times
- Positive Liberty
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Andrew Sullivan
- Talking Points Memo
- Daily Kos
- Media Matters
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Classical Values
- Virginia Postrel
- Jim Anderson
- Strange Doctrines
- John Scalzi
- The Pryhills
- Temperantia
- Rev. Spork
- Electric Commentary
- Two Aarons
- Farkleberries
- Paul Phillips
- Henry Neufeld
- Talk.Origins
- Talk.Reason
- Antievolution.org
- National Center for Science Education
- Talk.Design
- Michigan Citizens for Science
Archives
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
Other Information
Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb
Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.
Ed's Audio and Video
Declaring Independence podcast feed
YearlyKos 2007
Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement
Audio of Greg Raymer Interview
E-mail Policy
Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.
My Ecosystem Details
« Right Wing Rap: Just Stop. Please. | Main | Conservative Originalism and Interracial Marriage »
The Kirk Cameron Action Kit
Posted on: November 22, 2009 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton
Find more posts in:
Politics
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More




Comments
This initiative was reported in my regional daily newspaper given two creationists are handing out the books at a nearby junior college.
I'm always interested in how mainstream media frames this issue. Here's a money quote:
I'm glad they correctly described ID as creationism. But we know IDC is not a scientific theory, so that's a misrepresentation favoring a religious notion while besmirching the standards required to become a scientific theory. In addition, I thought Comfort and Cameron were YECs, not Intelligent Design Creationists. Anyone know which religious notion they're promoting in this book?
In addition I read somewhere their edition actually was abridged where they removed key arguments that falsified creationism after Wallace and Darwin published on this topic, contrary to this paper's report it's an unabridged. I think I even read it was Darwin's observations regarding biogeography, which remains one of the most devastating findings falsifying creationism and IDC (and excellently covered by in Jerry Coyne's Why Evolution is True and in Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth. Anyone privy to which edition and whether that edition is abridged?
Posted by: Michael Heath | November 22, 2009 9:48 AM
Got my hands on a copy the other day (my girlfriend's mom got it handed to her on a street corner and didn't want it). I forced myself to read the entire Ray Comfort introduction. It was awful. As poorly reasoned as the banana argument, and just as preachy. Except it went on for 49 pages.
I'm only into the first chapter of the actual book (which I have not read previously) and so far the part by that Chuck Darwin guy is pretty good :)
@Michael Heath: I have heard it is an abridged copy as well, although not having a regular copy to compare it to on hand means I don't know whether it's true or not.
Posted by: Uncephalized | November 22, 2009 11:04 AM
According to Comfort , the "second printing of 170,000 copies" is unabridged but Euginie Scott has noted that it is "still missing a crucial diagram from Chapter 4 as well as the epigraphs from Bacon and Whewell, which Darwin chose with care."
As far as YECs using ID for cover, there's nothing surprising about that, given that is the reason ID was concocted in the first place.
Posted by: John Pieret | November 22, 2009 11:15 AM
Try Project Gutenberg. There are later editions, letters, essays, biographies and other stuff available as well. - DJ
Posted by: DingoJack | November 22, 2009 11:16 AM
Uncephalized:
You can find the complete text of all the editions of the Origin here.
Posted by: John Pieret | November 22, 2009 11:19 AM
Uncephalized @ 2 - what did the Preface propose? YEC, OEC, IDC, or a Comfort creation?
Posted by: Michael Heath | November 22, 2009 11:30 AM
@Michael Heath.
The interesting discovered by your local paper is that the guy spent $300 buying the books. They were given away, but seemingly not by Comfort and Cameron if this is anything to go by. Does it mean that the campaign has resulted in their followers buying an extra 120,000 copies from them, then?
Posted by: Brian Jordan | November 22, 2009 12:05 PM
Brian Jordan @ 7 - I do not understand your comment post so I can't answer your question.
Posted by: Michael Heath | November 22, 2009 1:09 PM
umm Kirk Cameron is going to hell for lying:
"You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor"
Posted by: leafs_fan_jd | November 22, 2009 1:20 PM
Michael Heath @8
Sorry if that wasn't clear. My question was rhetorical: if that chap bought all his copies, he was the one giving them away, not Comfort. If he was paying the full cost of production, it wouldn't have cost Comfort and Cameron anything. If that applied to all the books given away, it would be C&C's helpers who were bearing the cost, while C&C are getting all the publicity.
Posted by: Brian Jordan | November 22, 2009 1:48 PM
I caught a snippet of the "hip" fundie radio show called "Wretched Radio" that often features Comfort and Cameron last night, and the show's host was gloating about how Comfort had outsmarted the "atheists" by distributing "200,000 books" (the number keeps growing) two days before they had said they were going to. "As wise as a serpent" was the comment.
They had a couple of field reports, one from Kirk Cameron at UCLA and the other from the University of Georgia, but they really didn't say anything interesting, though they sounded a little disappointed that they didn't get much trouble from atheists. After all, how hard is it to give out a couple of thousand free books on a university campus. I have no doubt you could give out as many copies of Mein Kampf and the Satanic Bible without much problem.
They then began subjecting an atheist student to the usual "If you are not perfect don't you deserve Hell?" line of questioning but I gave up at that point.
The radio show is probably on their web site, but you're welcome to use Google if you really want to find it!
Posted by: tacitus | November 22, 2009 2:13 PM
Posted by: Herod the Freemason | November 22, 2009 2:55 PM
The second edition is probably the best. By the sixth edition, Darwin was tying himself in knots trying to answer all of the objections of all of his critics, like a science writer trying to refute all the falsehoods and half-truths and fallacies a Gish Gallop.
Posted by: Monado, FCD | November 22, 2009 5:22 PM
According to this report, it appears Comfort used the first edition.
Posted by: John Pieret | November 22, 2009 8:03 PM
This is just more proof that intelligent design creationism appeals to the scientifically illiterate, the ignorant and the gullible. Ray Comfort fits all criteria.
Posted by: Paul Burnett | November 22, 2009 9:30 PM
Has anyone ever, when presented by Ray Comfort with his infamous "bananas prove ID" argument, countered by mentioning the pineapple?
Posted by: Android B | November 23, 2009 1:03 AM
Android B: The pineapple was a post-Fall modification. Blame it on Adam & Eve.
Posted by: Modusoperandi | November 23, 2009 1:07 AM
Everyone knows that Ray Comfort and Kirk Isthecameron? pulled the banana out of their ass; how did it get there in the first place.
Posted by: democommie | November 23, 2009 7:19 AM
re. #18: I think the banana was put there for "fun and games".
Posted by: fireweaver | November 23, 2009 1:38 PM