Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dispatches from the Creation Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Dumbass Quote of the Day | Main | Dumbass Quote of the Day »

Klayman Strikes the Martyr Pose

Posted on: December 31, 2009 9:02 AM, by Ed Brayton

My favorite gadfly attention whore, Larry Klayman, is at it again. He shows up at 5 am at the White House and wants them to deliver a letter directly to President Obama -- and then cries foul when the Secret Service comes out to have a chat with him and find out what's going on.

It all went down last Wednesday as Klayman, who is also spearheading a legal fight against the Washington Times, decided to directly deliver a letter to President Obama arguing that White House health care meetings constituted a "de facto advisory committee" under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

And he may well be right about that. I'm all for maximum transparency in government and I'll give Klayman credit for pursuing that cause against Republican and Democratic administration alike (he sued the Bush administration over virtually the same thing). But he can't seem to do the right thing without making an ass out of himself in the process:

But back to our story. Did we mention Klayman decided to make his unannounced trip to the White House at 5 a.m.?

At a security gate outside the White House (the one facing Pennsylvania Avenue, he says), Klayman walked up to a guard with the letter in an unsealed envelope and asked, "can you deliver this to POTUS?"

After the guard refused to take the letter, Klayman said he had identification, and she asked to see it, according to Klayman. "Then she said, 'we need to run a background check now.' Next thing I know, three uniformed Secret Service officers surround me and interrogate me," he says.

Over the next 75 minutes, according to Klayman, the three officers "worked me over" in the cold, asking for background information and about his intentions. He believes he was "in effect under false arrest." Even though Klayman told the officers he had to make a hearing in Baltimore, which is why he made the trip at 5 a.m., "they told me, 'you're not going anywhere, friend.'"

Finally, two female agents came out and intervened, and one politely told Klayman that he could take off after answering a few questions, he says. They ultimately took the letter.

Klayman tells TPMmuckraker he believes the incident was a result of the Secret Service being on heightened alert in the wake the embarrassing White House Gatecrashers episode. "They violated my civil rights," he says "I was on public property."

Well yes, I'm sure that is exactly why they reacted the way they did. I can't imagine what being on public property has to do with anything, though, or why he thinks they violated his civil rights. In a highly unusual situation, they came out and investigated what was going on, decided it wasn't a threat and let him go on his way. Klayman is just looking for attention, as usual.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

Yes, the Whits House is public property; it is not necessarily open to the public. If you come up to the gate with an envelope full of anthrax powder, I imagine the security detail might want to ask a few questions. It turns out Klayman didn't bring any anthrax; they still might want information.

Things change, but 20 years ago when I was working on Capitol Hill, the Pennsylvania Avenue gate was for the WH Tour, which started at 6 am. If you needed to deliver documents or such, you used the gate between the WH and the Executive Office Building. And even in those simpler days, you called ahead if you didn't want to be searched or questioned.

Posted by: kehrsam | December 31, 2009 9:24 AM

2

What a maroon. The White House is public property like a military base is "public property", isn't it? There are still rules.

For that matter, even public parks have open and closed hours. The city park near my house closes at 10 pm.

Posted by: george.w | December 31, 2009 9:43 AM

3

I must half-heartedly agree with Klayman that interrogating him for 75 minutes (if he is accurate about that) seems a bit excessive. I mean, if he'd been like "I'm Larry Klayman from Judicial Watch" and showed a driver's license, I'd Google him in my phone, see who he was, and in probably under 15 minutes I'd be like, "Uh, thanks for the letter, now please get the fuck out of here before this gets awkward." (Well, not in so many words, but you get my meaning)

But I don't think that's something sinister, probably most likely just bureaucracy at work or something.

Posted by: James Sweet | December 31, 2009 2:31 PM

4

Re James Sweet

AFAIK, Mr. Klayman is no longer connected with Judicial Watch.

Posted by: SLC | December 31, 2009 4:10 PM

5

@3 naah - I can't even agree half-heartedly with that. An hour and a quarter? At 5am, when most of the staff have not arrived for the day? A model of efficiency and courtesy! How long do you wait in your doctor's office?

Posted by: Paul Murray | December 31, 2009 9:47 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.