Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dispatches from the Creation Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Tisinai Debunks Another Anti-Gay Myth | Main | Lawsuit: Govt. Can't Regulate "Spiritual Advisers" »

Asset Forfeiture Insanity - Again

Posted on: January 28, 2010 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton

Radley Balko has an article in the latest issue of Reason about the asset forfeiture racket that is filling the coffers of police departments all over the nation. The article begins by recounting the story of a Michigan man, Anthony Smelley, who fell victim to one such racket when he was pulled over in Putnam County, Indiana.

Smelley had $17,500 in cash seized by local law enforcement officers on the premise that it was involved in a drug crime -- despite the fact that they found no evidence of drugs whatsoever and never charged Smelley with any crime at all. Nonetheless, they kept the cash. Smelley's case is hardly isolated:

The Justice Department's forfeiture fund (which doesn't include forfeitures from customs agents) jumped from $27 million in 1985 to $644 million in 1991; by 1996 it crossed the $1 billion line, and as of 2008 assets had increased to $3.1 billion. According to the government's own data, less than 20 percent of federal seizures involved property whose owners were ever prosecuted.

And that's just the federal level; most asset forfeitures take place at the local level, where the local law enforcement agency that seizes the cash typically gets to keep it. And here is perhaps the most appalling aspect of Smelley's case:

Timothy Bookwalter, the elected chief prosecutor for Putnam County, Indiana, did not represent the county in its effort to keep Anthony Smelley's money. Nor did anyone else in his office. Instead, the case was handled by Christopher Gambill, a local attorney in private practice. Gambill manages civil forfeiture cases for several Indiana counties, and he gets to keep a portion of what he wins in court. "My contingency for my own county is a quarter; for the others it's a third," Gambill says.

The concept is alarming. If allowing public prosecutors to benefit from forfeiture funds brushes up against due process, allowing an unaccountable private attorney to run forfeiture cases and keep a portion of the winnings rams a steamroller straight through the notion. "This is scandalous," Kessler says. "It's blatantly unconstitutional."

Gambill not only argues and briefs Putnam County forfeiture cases; he also determines which cases the county pursues in the first place. That means nongovernmental forfeiture attorneys are making criminal justice decisions that directly bolster their incomes. "It's really bad policy," David Smith says. "I also don't see how it could possibly be legal."

Mark Rutherford, chairman of the Indiana Public Defender Commission, says he isn't aware of any court challenges to the practice. "It's just sort of accepted here that this is the way things are," Rutherford says. "There are attorneys who have amassed fortunes off of these cases."

This, I would suggest, is the real crime here. This is, quite literally, highway robbery -- only the perps bring a badge instead of a gun.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1
only the perps bring a badge instead of a gun.

To be fair, they bring a badge and a gun.

Posted by: Jackson | January 28, 2010 9:34 AM

2

. . . something about foxes and hen houses should go right here . . .

Posted by: Crudely Wrott | January 28, 2010 9:53 AM

3

This happened in Indiana, where public highways are being given to private corporations. Now also a county legal department is privatized on a 'for profit' basis? That's the equivalent of hiring mercenaries to fight wars. ARG!

Posted by: Reverend Rodney | January 28, 2010 10:27 AM

4
That's the equivalent of hiring mercenaries to fight wars.

Actually, it's more like hiring mercenaries to declare wars for you, as well as fight them.

Posted by: Skeptical Cat | January 28, 2010 10:39 AM

5

So the standard for keeping your property is the ability to prove a negative. Brilliant!

Your property exists at the golden graces of the state.

Posted by: Johnny Clamboat | January 28, 2010 11:06 AM

6
That's the equivalent of hiring mercenaries to fight wars.

If I recall, the brits did something like that several hundred years ago with those Hessians...

Posted by: MikeMa | January 28, 2010 12:33 PM

7

Curiously, I can't help myself in wondering how many people who benefit from these asset forfeitures then turn around and claim that taxes steal their "rightfully earned" monies and are willing to wave "Don't Tread On Me" flags.

I'm afraid irony escapes the majority of people.

Posted by: Shawn Wilkinson | January 28, 2010 12:34 PM

8

Curiously, I can't help myself in wondering how many people who benefit from these asset forfeitures then turn around and claim that taxes steal their "rightfully earned" monies and are willing to wave "Don't Tread On Me" flags.

I'm afraid irony escapes the majority of people.

As I noted in the article, it's actually been the political right that has been most critical of forfeiture laws (both sides are responsible for putting them into place). Rep. Henry Hyde waged a one-man war to reform the federal civil forfeiture laws in 2000. And the Supreme Court decisions limiting forfeiture have been written by conservative justices, usually over dissent from the liberal ones.

I don't particularly care for either side. Conservative are usually worse on criminal justice and civil liberties issues. But the right has been much better about attacking forfeiture, likely because it's an assault on property rights.

Posted by: Radley Balko | January 28, 2010 1:16 PM

9

Hmmpph. Just keep your property out of the pool halls and on the straight and narrow and there is no reason fear it will be seized. Me- I have good upstanding property which knows better than to get into any trouble.

/rant

Posted by: ursa major | January 28, 2010 1:53 PM

10

He should have been fined $500 for being named 'Tony Smelley'

Posted by: steve s | January 28, 2010 3:05 PM

11

Ursa Major: Me- I have good upstanding property which knows better than to get into any trouble.

Do you share or rent?

Posted by: Uncle Glenny | January 28, 2010 6:41 PM

12

The more accurate equivalency is not with mercenaries but with privateers, commandeering ships and then sharing the booty with the country that gives them shelter. Francis Drake anyone?

Posted by: Keanus | January 28, 2010 10:00 PM

13

Huh - we must be on the Animal Farm and those are Napoleon's lackeys.
Four feet good, two feet bad!

@Keanus: With any luck they should follow in Drake's footsteps and find the gallows which they have earned.

Posted by: MadScientist | January 29, 2010 3:44 AM

14

"With any luck they should follow in Drake's footsteps and find the gallows which they have earned"

... but Drake was never hung. He died of disyntery at the age of 55.

Posted by: Marshall Schreiber | February 1, 2010 9:06 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.