Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dispatches from the Creation Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Irish Atheists Challenge New Blasphemy Law | Main | Appeals Court: Govt. Can Hide Illegal Surveillance »

Republican Hypocrisy on Underwear Bomber: Let Me Count The Ways

Posted on: January 4, 2010 9:16 AM, by Ed Brayton

Actually, I don't have to because Jon Perr has already done it at Crooks and Liars. Virtually everything being said by the Republicans about the Christmas Day attempted terrorist bombing and Obama's response to it has been hypocritical because every argument applies better to Bush's handling of the shoe bomber incident -- and not one of them uttered a peep about that. They've criticized Obama for not canceling his vacation and not speaking out quickly enough about the incident.

While President Obama did not speak to the American people for three days after the Flight 253 incident, George W. Bush did not surface to address the December 22, 2001 attempted shoe bombing until six days after it occurred. Even then, as Huffington Post's Sam Stein recounted, "it was only in passing."

They've criticized him for trying the would-be bomber in civilian court - the same place the shoe bomber was tried. They've criticized him because the apparent masterminds behind the bombing were released from Gitmo -- without bothering to mention that they were released by the Bush administration, not by Obama. The hypocrisy is staggering even for politics.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

John Brennan, President Obama's Deputy National Security Advisor whose chartered with managing counter-terrorism from within the White House made the rounds on the Sunday TV talk shows yesterday morning. He ripped on Dick Cheney big-time on the show I watched, Meet the Press where Brennan stated:

I'm very disappointed in the vice president's comments. I'm neither a Republican nor a Democrat -- I've worked for the past five administrations. And either the vice president is willfully mischaracterizing this president's position -- both in terms of language he uses, and the actions he's taken -- or he's ignorant of the fact. And in either case, it doesn't speak well of what the vice president's doing.

"Dishonest or ignorant?" was the primary question when observing both the Bush Administration and the Republican Party over at least the past 10 years.

We should also note that Mr. Brennan lost out on a shot to be Director of the CIA for President Obama because he was tied by some on the Left to the CIA's use of torture and rendition, a claim Brennan rejects claiming he was instead an opponent of torture. I don't remember much about this issue regarding Mr. Brennan but I seem to remember that posted about this at least once.

The whole Meet the Press interview with Mr. Brennan and the show's follow-on guests, Bush officials ex-NSA/CIA Director Michael Haydn and ex-Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff is worth watching. Both Misters Haydn and Chertoff refused to defend Mr. Cheney, repeatedly defended Mr. Brennan and Janet Napolitano (which makes me feel a whole lot better given my suspicion she's not up to the task mindset-wise). However Mr. Haydn continued his advocacy that we dismiss investigations into the U.S. torture policy under Bush/Cheney.

I think President Obama won some big political points in yesterday's talk show wars. I think Brennan was even on Fox News yesterday morning though I didn't watch that segment. An analysis by someone who did would be most welcomed by at least me, I suspect many others as well.

Posted by: Michael Heath | January 4, 2010 9:42 AM

2

But this guy was more serious than the shoe bomber - compare what he was willing to set on fire to what the shoe bomber tried to light.

Posted by: dean | January 4, 2010 9:52 AM

3

Dean,
Goodness gracious great balls of fire, you are right.

Posted by: Naughtius Maximus | January 4, 2010 10:19 AM

4

I would like to put forth the idea, after observing stupidity from the conservatives for years, that the important dichotomy is not actually between Democrats and Republicans at all. It's not even really a dichotomy. I like to look at it as a two-way axis.

There is the authoritarianism-nonauthoritarian axis - the regressive-progressive axis - and the unrealistic-realistic axis.

Fundies and people who scream such as this are at the authoritarian-unrealistic extreme; we are hopefully at the realistic-nonauthoritarian extreme.

Posted by: Katharine | January 4, 2010 11:29 AM

5

It is not even an axis at all; it is a chart.

Whoops.

Posted by: Katharine | January 4, 2010 11:31 AM

6

Katherine, you have three axes; isn't that a tensor?

Posted by: OriGuy | January 4, 2010 5:06 PM

7

I realize I am off topic and this post is not about the dangers of flying but it is neither a Democrat nor Republican issue. It is an American issue and well frankly a human issue. I don't want to get blown up when I take a plane to visit my grandma over Christmas. We need to screen these guys better. This guy should have never been allowed on that plane. I don't care whose watch he was on, Obama's or Bush's the guy shouldn't be able to get on a plane with explosives in his underpants.

Posted by: Jen | January 5, 2010 2:18 PM

8

And, the hypocrisy continues. Rudy 9/11 Guiliani was on the news this morning saying there was never a terrorist attack on human soil under Bush, and there was one under Obama. OK, first of all, he does remember 9/11, I am sure of this, since he mentions it constantly. Secondly, what about the shoe bomber? It was an equivalent attempt.

Posted by: MomTFH | January 8, 2010 9:48 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.