Max Blumenthal has an article at Salon revealing some very interesting things about James O'Keefe, the conservative agent provacateur who tried to infiltrate Sen. Mary Landrieu's office to tamper with the phone system and was behind the now-infamous ACORN videos, particularly his trail of racist stunts and associations.
Exhibit #1 is his attendance at a white nationalist conference in 2006, a conference that featured lots of virulent racists like Jared Taylor:
Now an activist organization that monitors hate groups has produced a photo of O'Keefe at a 2006 conference on "Race and Conservatism" that featured leading white nationalists. The photo, first published Jan. 30 on the Web site of the anti-racism group One People's Project, shows O'Keefe at the gathering, which was so controversial even the ultra-right Leadership Institute, which employed O'Keefe at the time, withdrew its backing. But O'Keefe and fellow young conservative provocateur Marcus Epstein soldiered on to give anti-Semites, professional racists and proponents of Aryanism an opportunity to share their grievances and plans to make inroads in the GOP.According to One People's Project founder Daryle Jenkins, O'Keefe was manning the literature table at the gathering that brought together anti-Semites, professional racists and proponents of Aryanism. OPP covered the event at the time, sending a freelance photographer to document the gathering. Jenkins told me the table was filled with tracts from the white supremacist right, including two pseudo-academic publications that have called blacks and Latinos genetically inferior to whites: American Renaissance and the Occidental Quarterly. The leading speaker was Jared Taylor, founder of the white nationalist group American Renaissance.
Is this all true? Well, maybe. Blumenthal is not averse to oversimplifying just a bit in his reports, so it's important to look at the details. The Washington Independent's Dave Weigel was at this event as well and he writes that while O'Keefe was definitely at the event, he did not see him selling racist literature:
Max Blumenthal's story about "James O'Keefe's race problem" leads with an account of an August 30, 2006 after-work event hosted by the Robert Taft Club in Arlington, Va., where John Derbyshire and Kevin Martin joined Jared Taylor -- the editor of the white nationalist magazine American Renaissance -- to discuss "race and conservatism." Earlier today, I posted my own account of that event and some context about the culture of see-what-we-can-get-away-with political correctness among young conservatives.Apparently, the One People's Project is citing me as a corroborating source on the event -- but there are aspects of their story I can't confirm. While their photo of O'Keefe is definitely from the event, I took it on the photographer's word that O'Keefe was pictured "as he maintained a literature table near the panelists." I can personally confirm that he was there, but not that he was manning the table -- nor that O'Keefe "planned" the event (as Blumenthal put it) with Marcus Epstein, who was president of the Robert Taft Club.
Here's how I came across the story: On Jan. 27, the photographer (who goes by the name Isis) from the One People's Project called to ask me if I had any photos of the event. She remembered seeing me there -- it was one of several RTC events I attended, including one where Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) spoke. I explained that I didn't, but compared my version of the event with hers. She told me that she had photos of the event, but the full photos had been taken by the FBI in a raid. All she had on hand were cropped headshots of people who were at the event.
She emailed me the photo of O'Keefe, and I immediately recognized him from the event. And she told me that, unfortunately, the cropping had removed the table he was sitting at, which included copies of American Renaissance magazine. I remembered the table -- curious, I'd grabbed a copy of the magazine, which was, of course, incredibly racist -- and took her word that the photo showed O'Keefe sitting there. In the photo, after all, we can see a man walking out the door and O'Keefe's head is much lower than his. But could I personally confirm that O'Keefe was manning the table at an event I attended four years and several phones/cameras ago? Well, no. I suggested that the story didn't really have legs if O'Keefe wasn't selling literature or hadn't planned the event, as, well, people like me had shown up. It was a debate, after all, with two people -- one of them African-American -- ganging up on the truly ridiculous Taylor.
Fast forward to today and the Blumenthal article. Blumenthal writes that One People's Project founder Daryle Jenkins was the source for the "manning the table" claim. But I can't confirm that, because I don't remember who was at the table at any particular time. All I know is that O'Keefe was there and he was working for LI at the time.
If OPP is able to retrieve its original photo and clear this up, it should do so.
Merely being at the event is not evidence of anything because, as Weigel notes, this was actually a debate and Taylor was being heavily criticized. And of course, people like Weigel were there as well. There's no particular reason to doubt the account of OPP at this point, but it would be nice to have more than that account to make the case.
Blumenthal's article cites more evidence:
By O'Keefe's own account, his racial troubles became acute when he entered the multicultural atmosphere of Rutgers University's dormitory system. In an online diary that has since been scrubbed from the Web (but not before being captured on Daily Kos), he wrote that he was forced to live on an all-black dormitory floor after refusing to live with the gay roommate he was initially assigned. O'Keefe claimed his next roommate was "an Indian midget ... who smelled like shit." The roommate left, however, and was replaced by "a greek kid." The new roommate complained to a residential administrator that O'Keefe had called his neighbors "niggers," prompting the school to expel him from the dorm. He rejected the accusation as a "complete lie," writing, "I was lead out of the room crying and screaming at him and my situation, no friends, no one one [sic] to talk to, forced to go in front of a black man, Dean Tolbert, to defend myself and help explain that I did not call anyone any names."...Meanwhile, O'Keefe lost his job at the Leadership Institute in 2008 for a prank call he made to an Ohio-based Planned Parenthood clinic. During the call, O'Keefe offered a donation to the clinic on the condition that it would be earmarked to pay for aborting African-American fetuses. "Because there's definitely way too many black people in Ohio," O'Keefe remarked to the receptionist. "So, I'm just trying to do my part."
Weigel has a more nuanced look at young conservative activists and the fringe of right wing racism.

Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of 

Comments
It's actually very simple. When one gets into the pen with the pigs, one may expect to emerge with a coating of mud.
Posted by: SLC | February 4, 2010 9:39 AM
Wait... the FBI stole their photos? Why?
Posted by: Shawn Wilkinson | February 4, 2010 9:46 AM
Well, none of that surprises me in the least. Especially the "no friends" bit.
Posted by: Dunc | February 4, 2010 9:46 AM
When the story about Landrieu's office broke, it was obvious that this kid was some sort of attention whore. Reading the the bit about his time at Rutgers, it's becoming clear that it's pathological.
Posted by: FishyFred | February 4, 2010 10:08 AM
Far-right Republican operative has problems with Black people? Really? Forgive me, but where's the story here?
Posted by: Traces | February 4, 2010 10:59 AM
Uh oh … Ed should have taken the time to actually dig a little into this story before swallowing Sid Vicious’ kid off the credibility cliff on this one.
Mr. Jenkins only produced the name of one witness: David Weigel who, at the time was a reporter with Reason Magazine. We called Mr. Weigel and he denied ever telling Mr. Jenkins that Mr. O’Keefe was “manning the table.” Indeed, he has already gone on record denying he said that.
http://bigjournalism.com/sright/2010/02/03/james-okeefe-vs-max-blumenthal-how-the-left-distorts-invents-and-lies/
Would you like some cracked pepper with that crow?
Posted by: Mike H | February 4, 2010 11:22 AM
Mike -- Given that Ed reported exactly that, that Weigel could only confirm that O'Keefe was there, not that he was manning a table, (And quoted Weigel himself to that effect) as well as using such language as "Is it true? Well, maybe." Why on earth do you believe Ed would be interested in a plate of crow, with or without cracked pepper?
It would seem that the only thing cracked here is not the pepper, but your reading comprehension skills.
Posted by: Dave | February 4, 2010 11:28 AM
Dave – that’s cute and all, but still bullshit. Weigel’s more “nuanced look” came only after Biretbart called shenanigans on his previous article in which he was pretty explicit that O’Keefe was manning a table full of neo-Nazi literature. Now he’s “not sure” and cant remember. That’s one hell of a degradation of memory in just a few hours.
Posted by: Mike H | February 4, 2010 11:58 AM
Mike, whats bullshit is you trying to take Ed to task for not reporting what he very clearly did report. If you have an issue with Weigel changing his story (taking you at your word that he did), go take it up with Weigel.
Posted by: Dave | February 4, 2010 12:05 PM
"'I was lead out of the room crying and screaming at him and my situation, no friends, no one one [sic] to talk to, forced to go in front of a black man, Dean Tolbert, to defend myself and help explain that I did not call anyone any names.'..."
This is simply hilarious.
The fact is that it doesn't matter whether he was selling literature or not. He was seen attending a white nationalist event. That fact should be enough.
Posted by: Anyong | February 4, 2010 12:07 PM
If I am not much mistaken, Don Black, the proprietor of the antisemitic racist stormfront web site was also present at this event. Since there seems to be no doubt that O'Keefe was at this meeting, he should be asked to explain what he was doing there. Weigel was there as a reporter so he had a legitimate reason for being at the meeting.
Posted by: SLC | February 4, 2010 12:33 PM
The fact is that it doesn't matter whether he was selling literature or not. He was seen attending a white nationalist event. That fact should be enough.
A "white nationalist event" organized by Marcus Epstien, who is half Korean and half Jewish.
That should be enough.
Posted by: Mike H | February 4, 2010 1:23 PM
Actually, O'Keefe was also photographed visiting several Acorn offices and the office of a Democratic Senator. Without a bit more info, it would be awfully hard, with that track record, to know what his motive in attending might be.
Posted by: psweet | February 4, 2010 1:35 PM
Racist or not, everything about his past and present paints him as a shitty little prick with behavioral problems. It seems that a common theme with young movement conservatives is that they act like adolescents going into college, make asses out of themselves, and then spend the rest of their lives lashing out at the people they believe to have been victimized by.
Posted by: Steve Reuland | February 4, 2010 1:36 PM
"Racist or not" ... well its nice to see that you don’t let little things like facts stand in the way of a good argument.
Posted by: Mike H | February 4, 2010 1:46 PM
I was lead out of the room crying and screaming
What a wuss.
Posted by: Taz | February 4, 2010 1:50 PM
Re Mike H
Gee, Mr. Epstein invites racist antisemites like Don Black to appear at events he organizes. Maybe he should explain why he associates with people like that. If he is ignorant of Mr. Blacks proclivities, he should visit the stormfront web site for an education.
Posted by: SLC | February 4, 2010 1:53 PM
"A "white nationalist event" organized by Marcus Epstien, who is half Korean and half Jewish."
And who is prone to calling random black women "nigger" and karate-chopping them in the face.
"That should be enough."
Indeed.
Posted by: Shygetz | February 4, 2010 2:02 PM
""Racist or not" ... well its nice to see that you don’t let little things like facts stand in the way of a good argument."
What facts would those be? And in what way do they contradict anything I said?
Posted by: Steve Reuland | February 4, 2010 2:09 PM
Mike H,
Let me see if I understand your point. You are saying that the burglar who broke into a congresswoman's office and attempted to bug her phone was not also a vehement racist. Is that correct?
Is that supposed to improve our opinion of him?
Posted by: eric | February 4, 2010 2:15 PM
"he wrote that he was forced to live on an all-black dormitory floor"
&
"The roommate left, however, and was replaced by "a greek kid.""
I didn't realize Greeks were black. I bet they even allowed Eye-talians in that dorm.
Posted by: Rob Jase | February 4, 2010 2:52 PM
He looks kind of like Timothy McVeigh. But all these white people look the same to me.
Posted by: Chuck, joking around | February 4, 2010 3:06 PM
"By O'Keefe's own account, his racial troubles became acute when he entered the multicultural atmosphere of Rutgers University's dormitory system."
You know, someone who has such a hard time getting along with roommates, particularly those of a different race or sexual orientation, should really, really not be risking a prison sentence.
Posted by: Steve Reuland | February 4, 2010 3:32 PM
eric @ 20:
I don't believe anyone has established whether Mr. O'Keefe and his crew attempted to bug the phones of the aforementioned offices. I suggest we non-conservatives maintain a standard far above that which conservatives revel in maintaining.
Posted by: Michael Heath | February 4, 2010 3:47 PM
Re Michael Heath
Regardless of his motive, he entered Senator Landrieus' office under false pretenses posing as a Verizon employee. He was clearly there to do something to the phones.
Posted by: SLC | February 4, 2010 4:01 PM
SLC @ 25 - Of course I have little use for Mr. O'Keefe, or those who leveraged his ACORN activities like our Congress. However that doesn't mean we should take what distinguishes us in a good way and discard that; in this case that would be our fealty to facts and being honest. Our differences on these two aspects are great distinguishing strengths we should hold dear.
Posted by: Michael Heath | February 4, 2010 4:05 PM
M.H.: I don't believe anyone has established whether Mr. O'Keefe and his crew attempted to bug the phones of the aforementioned offices...
Fair enough. Perhaps you can ask Mike H. if he only meant that the congressional burgler-of-unknown-motive was not a vehement racist. I think the question works pretty much just as well without the 'and' clause.
Posted by: eric | February 4, 2010 4:31 PM
eric @ 27:
eric, I don't think Mike H. is worth either of our time and certainly not our consideration. I state this humbly since he's drew me into responding to him a few times as well. However I've now encountered him enough times to know that objective truth is not a standard he seeks or adheres to nor does he have any regard for America's interests or founding ideals.
So the only benefit of encountering him is that he helps validate that the worst attributes of conservatism remain in the public square in spite of their abject failure in governing, i.e., that a defining attribute of conservatism is not to continuously improve through adaptation, but instead to become ever more strident in defense of the ideology which is becoming increasingly and fatally defective (in terms of governance, not necessarily in terms of electability).
Posted by: Michael Heath | February 4, 2010 6:19 PM
Color me not surprised.
Posted by: Ryan | February 4, 2010 11:02 PM
Michael Heath:
I am most happy that you have decided that Mike H. IS a whanker and that his "arguments" all proceed from his being a troll.
Posted by: democommie | February 5, 2010 7:55 AM
I find it interesting that Marcus Epstein associates with people who not only have ties to antisemites but probably would become physically ill at the thought of him getting romantically involved with one of their daughters (or sons, lol).
Posted by: Adrienne | February 5, 2010 8:39 AM
Wow, what a piece of work.
Posted by: James Sweet | February 5, 2010 12:54 PM
A "white nationalist event" organized by Marcus Epstien, who is half Korean and half Jewish.
That should be enough.
Posted by: Mike H
-----
UMMM. That's not enough.
Marcus Epstein is a racist. Here is a conversation he had with a liberal blogger.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV4ppLfliTQ
He fits right in. The fact that he looks Caucasian somewhere in his demented mind makes him think he's white.
He works for known racist Pat Buchannon. I guess you didn't know that either.
Just because his last name is Epstein does not mean he doesn't think he's bred better than others.
Your point is mute.
Posted by: sharksbreath | February 6, 2010 12:04 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV4ppLfliTQ
If you watch the video please watch the 14-16 min mark.
Epstein actually states that every country that has black people in it. The blacks have a higher crime rate. It's a fact.
Cenk asks him where did he get that fact.
Epstein doesn't know.
Cenk calls him on it.
Another Racist republican getting their butt kicked.
Posted by: sharksbreath | February 6, 2010 12:18 PM
Okay, I understand the "half-Korean" mention, but how does Epstein being half-Jewish negate the claim that this conference was a "white nationalist event?" Last time I checked, therre were and are Caucasian Jews.
Posted by: daniel rotter | February 6, 2010 2:10 PM