Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dispatches from the Creation Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Radio Show Preview 3-11-10 | Main | The Oath Keepers' Paranoia »

It's Okay When Cops Do It, Example # gajillion

Posted on: March 12, 2010 9:02 AM, by Ed Brayton

From the LA Times:

An off-duty Orange County sheriff's deputy, who allegedly was intoxicated when he crashed his Mercedes-Benz into another vehicle and injured a passenger, had crashed 30 minutes earlier and was allowed to drive from that accident scene by fellow deputies, authorities said Friday.

Sheriff's deputies were called Monday afternoon to a crash involving Deputy Allan James Waters, 36, and another vehicle outside City Hall in Dana Point. Deputies took a report and permitted Waters keep driving, said Assistant Sheriff Mike James.

And the result:

About 30 minutes later, at 5:20 p.m., Waters crashed his Mercedes-Benz into a Toyota in Laguna Niguel, causing it to cross the center median and slam into a tree, according to the California Highway Patrol. Dolores Molina, a 78-year-old passenger in the Toyota, suffered minor injuries.

CHP officers said Waters showed signs of being intoxicated and was booked on suspicion of driving under the influence. He was released Wednesday, according to jail records.

Because when you drive drunk, that's a felony; when a cop drives drunk, it's okay. He can count on his buddies to let him go because cops don't arrest cops. But these are the same people, of course, who will talk endlessly about the rule of law.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

Until the penalty for the enabling cops are made severe enough, no change will occur in their behavior.

If these 'rule of law' class acts want to help their drunken brethren, put them in the back and drive them home.

Posted by: MikeMa | March 12, 2010 9:10 AM

2

Sometimes I have to work hard to maintain respect for the police as people. Maybe that's because when police act this way they are showing no respect for the citizens.

Posted by: gski | March 12, 2010 9:45 AM

3

The recent story of University of Florida grad student Kofi Adu-Brempong deserves more attention in the annals of cops-gone-crazy.

When Adu-Brempong was having a noisy nervous breakdown alone in his student-housing apartment, five UF PD officers (previously famous for the "don't taser me, bro!" incident) broke down his door, shot him twice with a taser, three times with bean-bag shotgun shells, and once in the face with an M-4 (a combat-grade automatic rifle) - all in 30 seconds.

Two other facts need mentioning here: a) Adu-Brempong is 5-foot, 4-inches tall, weighs 140 pounds and walked with a cane, and b) the cop with the M-4 was recently involved in an incident in which he and several other police drove drunk through a black neighborhood throwing eggs at pedestrians.

Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | March 12, 2010 9:55 AM

4

In fairness, I know a guy -- not a cop, not a friend of a cop -- who hit a curb or something, was obviously drunk, and the cop asked him how far away he lived (it was just down the street) and let him go without a breathalyzer or anything. Not that this makes it okay; I'm just saying, it's not entirely unheard of for non-cops to get away with this stuff too.

Now me, any time I interact with a uniformed authority figure, the mutual contempt is palpable. I would never get away with a warning in a situation like that. heh...

Posted by: James Sweet | March 12, 2010 10:18 AM

5

I don't know. I think this is sort of a gray area. I mean, there is a police shortage in many towns, so even if he was drunk, and even really drunk, he was probably needed out there on the streets.

Hopefully, he had his gun so when he rammed that car if the little old lady had caused a dust up he would have been able to take her out with a warning shot to the leg or something.

Drunk or not, I say, arm 'em to the teeth and turn 'em loose. We need cops.

Posted by: Skip | March 12, 2010 10:25 AM

6
Drunk or not, I say, arm 'em to the teeth and turn 'em loose. We need cops.

This actually kind of worked in NYC, as I understand it... Just recruit so many damn cops that there has to be a half dozen of 'em hanging around any time there's a crime.

Then there was that whole Amadou Diallo thing, which kind of threw a monkeywrench in that whole idea....

Posted by: James Sweet | March 12, 2010 10:30 AM

7

@Pierce:

I loved this line from that article:

When Adu-Brempong quit talking with them, police decided to move in because they didn't know if he was harming himself or someone else, Holcomb said.

We don't know if you're harming yourself, so we're going to break in and make sure you get harmed.

Posted by: Tacroy | March 12, 2010 11:40 AM

8

In the Florida - Adu-Brempong case, the police electrocuted him with tasers, beat him with explosive propelled bean bags and shot him in the face with a military assault rifle.

In the excitement they forgot to use mace, batons and their sidearms. Come on people; you are given those tools for a reason; use them!

Would it be fair to say Adu-Brempong's fears are no longer delusional? He is not mentally ill, he is right.

Maybe the police were influenced by the US Army's philosophy during the Vietnam conflict; villages must be destroyed to be saved.

Posted by: Pinky | March 12, 2010 11:01 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.