Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dispatches from the Creation Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Badass Quote of the Day | Main | Blackwater founder fleeing justice? »

Daily Show on Obama and Executive Authority

Posted on: June 20, 2010 9:23 AM, by Ed Brayton

Jon Stewart did a necessary and scathing rift on the many ways that Obama has continued Bush's shredding of the Constitution in pursuing the war on terror on Tuesday. He shows clip after clip of Obama saying how important it is to change the Bush policies in this regard, followed by clip after clip of him doing the same thing he condemned as a candidate.

You know the real tragedy of this? It takes a comedian to do what the mainstream media should be doing every day.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

It's a striking contrast that you'd think a real newscaster would have highlighted, instead of leaving it to a comedy show. I'm disappointed that Obama has done so poorly in this regard (and that the news media has done so poorly in covering it).

By the way, I think you mean "scathing riff."

Posted by: Zeno | June 20, 2010 9:59 AM

2

Idealism, meet reality.

Posted by: asdf | June 20, 2010 10:39 AM

3

John Stewart may claim to be merely a comedian, but he packs more hard news in one show than, say, Fox does in a year.
Obama must be called to account for not stopping torture and not restoring the ENTIRE Bill of Rights. And criminal members of the Bush administration (Cheney, etc.) must be brought to justice.

Posted by: Reverend Rodney | June 20, 2010 10:48 AM

4

Ed stated:

You know the real tragedy of this? It takes a comedian to do what the mainstream media should be doing every day.


This clip is 8 minutes and 32 seconds long. I just finished Jonathan Atler's book on the first year of the Obama presidency, The Promise. You can't get anymore mainstream than Senior Newsweek Editor Jon Atler. This clip contained about 8 minutes more information regarding Obama's repeatedly breaking his oath to defend the Constitution than Mr. Atler's entire book.

Posted by: Michael Heath | June 20, 2010 10:52 AM

5

This clip contained about 8 minutes more information regarding Obama's repeatedly breaking his oath to defend the Constitution than Mr. Atler's entire book.

Good thing Americans don't read books anymore.

Posted by: William George | June 20, 2010 10:56 AM

6

Reverend Rodney - 'John Steward packs more into 8 minutes 20 seconds* than FOX does in a bazillion years.'
Fixed that for you. - Dingo
----
* About the time it takes light to travel from the Sun to the Earth

Posted by: DingoJack | June 20, 2010 11:34 AM

7

FANTASTIC Daily Show clip!

"Change we can believe in" my hiney!

Posted by: Angie | June 20, 2010 11:38 AM

8

Lemme splain this:

"Habeas Corpus for Innocents" might win Democratic Primaries

but

"Civil Rights for Terrorists" doesn't win electoral votes.

Am I right?

Posted by: asdf | June 20, 2010 11:41 AM

9

Re Michael Heath

Not to be picky here but AFAIK, the authors' name is Jonathan Alter.

Posted by: SLC | June 20, 2010 11:51 AM

10

I thought I knew that but mistyping it twice in one comment post doesn't provide much of an excuse it was an inadvertent typo.

Posted by: Michael Heath | June 20, 2010 12:15 PM

11

The day after the show this clip is from aired, Fox News said something about the bit. Although I'm not sure what since I was at work and only caught a "coming up after the commercial break" run down but they framed it as "Jon Stewart finally turns on Obama!".

Posted by: Jeremy Shaffer | June 20, 2010 12:47 PM

12

While I generally agree with the comments about the media, I think it should be noted that the clips Stewart used for contrast were from MSNBC... so clearly they are reporting these things. They may not lay it out so bluntly, but they are reporting it.

Posted by: havoc | June 20, 2010 1:15 PM

13

#12 I was thinking the same thing. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, most of those clips were not only from Maddow, but were all within a week or two.

As much as I enjoy Stewart, that is one part that always annoys me a bit, he likes to play into the popular meme that MSNBC is the left's version of fox news, and it is absurd to the Nth degree when you consider this kind of reporting, which quite frankly is pretty dang common on MSNBC. They are quite critical of Obama.

Posted by: Uncle Bob | June 20, 2010 1:51 PM

14

havoc - I don't consider MSNBC part of the mainstream media for two primary reasons though one is possibly changing for the better:

1) Their ratings are abysmally small.

2) Their exclusive coverage on a story does not eventually become part of the national consciousness by their influencing bigger outlets to run a like-story. Broadcast TV news shows and Fox News have big enough numbers to demand a presidential reaction to their stories. The New York Times and some other print media is often the basis of stories by media outlets with big audiences so they comply as well their influence. MSNBC doesn't have the ratings or influence to resonate beyond their studios, even with sister outlet NBC News on stories such as this.

I have noticed that these big media outlets and conservative leaders are starting to pay attention to at least Rachel Maddow on some stories. So perhaps someday MSNBC can pursue a story relentlessly enough that the protagonists of the story must respond because bigger outlets follow their lead. However in the case of President Obama's record in the federal courts that simply hasn't happened; he's not getting the volume of media pressure that demands he respond and he therefore doesn't.

Posted by: Michael Heath | June 20, 2010 1:59 PM

15

Maybe Bush just got a really deep sun tan.

Posted by: Paen | June 20, 2010 2:12 PM

16
Maybe Bush just got a really deep sun tan.

And pulled that crayon out of his nose?

Posted by: Brandon | June 20, 2010 6:14 PM

17

you know the country is in trouble when jon stewart and al franken (deservedly) have more credibility than any "serious" politician or reporter

Posted by: kevin R | June 20, 2010 7:04 PM

18

Obama, don't wear the ring. I know it's very tempting ...

You know the real tragedy of this? It takes a comedian to do what the mainstream media should be doing every day.

In a sense, it's not that surprising. Comedy and political commentary have gone hand in hand since Aristophanes.

Posted by: James K | June 21, 2010 1:29 AM

19

asdf @8 touches on the real real tragedy: there is just no constituency in this country for following the Constitution. That's what 50 years of crappy civics and no critical thinking education gets you. Among innumerable other disasters.

Posted by: BadExampleMan | June 21, 2010 4:49 AM

20

this is why Stewart is a more credible news source than anything mainstream.

http://punditkitchen.com/2009/03/26/political-pictures-jon-stewart-journalist-appalled/

Posted by: andrew | June 21, 2010 9:48 AM

21

When the news is a joke the only people you can rely on are comedians.

Posted by: random guy | June 22, 2010 12:48 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.