Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks
dotphysbanner.jpg

Dot Physics

What happens when you take some basic, introductory physics and apply them to cool things you see? Dot Physics happens. This blog looks at movies, experiments, demos and other topics typically aimed at the introductory physics level.

Profile

allain_pic4.jpg Rhett Allain is an Associate Professor of Physics at Southeastern Louisiana University. He enjoys teaching and talking about physics. Sometimes he takes things apart and can't put them back together.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

« Education Should be Free | Main | More ESPN Sport Science Goodness »

Basics: The Electrostatic Interaction

Category: Contentchargeelectrostatic
Posted on: March 16, 2010 6:50 PM, by Rhett Allain

Pre Reqs: vectors, forces

This is typically the first topic in the second semester of introductory physics - the interaction between objects with electric charge. There are 4 fundamental forces that physics typically looks at:

  • Gravity - an interaction between objects with mass - wow, I don't have a post on the universal law of gravity?
  • Electromagnetic - an interaction between objects with electric charge.
  • Weak Nuclear - an interaction between (let me just say for simplicity) leptons.
  • Strong Nuclear - an interaction between hadrons.

I know those last two are complicated - but I am not going to talk about the strong and weak forces.

Coulomb's Law

Coulomb's Law is a model for the forces between two charged particles. Here is the model.

La te xi t 1

Looks complicated, doesn't it? But that is the best way to represent that. Typically, books might just show the magnitude of the force, but I think you can handle the vector form. Let me draw a picture to go along with this.

Untitled

Maybe you see the first problem - which force is this equation for? If the vector r is pointing from q1 to q2, then this gives the force that q1 exerts on charge q2. Note that it is important to include the unit vector r-hat in the equation or you would not have both sides of the equation as vectors. Also, the denominator is the magnitude of this vector squared. If you did not know the vector r, but instead had the location of the two charges (this happens a lot), then:

La te xi t 1 1

Also, in that equation, the 1/4pi-epsilon term is a constant. The charges should be in units of Coulombs, and the distances in meters - this will give a force in Newtons. Here is the value for that constant: (some texts just call this k or something)

La te xi t 1 4

One final note - in this form, the sign of the charge DOES matter, and this a good thing. If the two charges have opposite signs, the direction of the force will be in the opposite direction as the r-hat vector. If both charges have the same sign, then this force will be pushing the two charges away from each other.

Maybe this seems like an unnecessarily complicated form of Coulomb's Law, but I think it is the most useful in the long run.

Comparison with gravity

It is useful to make a comparison between the universal law of gravity and the Coulomb force. Here is the gravitational force:

La te xi t 1 2

This looks similar to the Coulomb equation. The big difference is the negative sign. This is there because gravity is always an attractive force but the mass is always positive.

Where does this come from?

This was a great question I had introductory physics one time. Actually, I think it was something like "how do you derive Coulomb's Law?" The answer: you don't. Coulomb's law is a mathematical model based on experimental data. The basic idea is to get two spheres and put some electric charge on them. Find some way to measure the force between them and see how that compares to the distance. There is a trick here - a uniformly charged sphere looks just like a point charge. Coulomb's law deals with point charges.

An Example

This is what my students would want - a worked out example. Here is my completely made up example. Suppose I have a 3 nanoCoulomb (nC) charged ball at the origin and a -7 nC charged ball at the location < 0.3, -0.4, 0 > m. What is the force on the negatively charged ball? Here is sketch:

Untitled 1

The first thing I need is the vector r. This is pretty easy since one of the charges is at the origin. I also need the magnitude of the r vector and the unit vector r-hat.

La te xi t 1 3

Now, I just have to put stuff in. Here is what I get:

La te xi t 1 5

Not too bad, is it?

Superposition

One last very important thing. What if you have more than two charges? The superposition principle applies to the Coulomb force. Basically, this means that if you have three charges (called A, B, and C), then the force on C will be the vector sum of the force on C due to A and the force on C due to B. Here is a picture.

Untitled 2

I will do an example with more than two charges in a later post.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Physical Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/133838

Comments

1

I disagree that Coulomb's law is purely an empirical model. It may have been discovered that way but, like every other phenomenon in electromagnetism, it follows from Maxwell's equations, and can be be derived from applying Gauss' law to a point charge.

Posted by: lordaxil | March 18, 2010 10:38 AM

2

@lordaxil,

I think this could be like the "which came first, the chicken or the egg". The important thing is that Coulomb's law is consistent with maxwell's equations. Those are also essentially experimentally determined.

Posted by: Rhett Allain Author Profile Page | March 18, 2010 10:53 AM

3

Coulombs law is basically a experimental result.The effect of medium between the two charges is experimental results.If you put this law in cgs system it will be easy ,but to satisfy the basic results in electromagnetism ,It is put in this form in SI system .Its inverse law behavior with gravitaional force is one of the beautiful symmetry which exist in nature

Posted by: vinod arora | March 18, 2010 11:54 AM

4

@Rhett

you wrote "There are 4 fundamental forces that physics typically looks at:"

typically?

have you been hiding a fifth force somewhere?

:)


Posted by: rob | March 18, 2010 1:04 PM

5

@Rob,

Yes - I am saving that for a special occasion.

Posted by: Rhett Allain Author Profile Page | March 18, 2010 1:59 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.