Official Comment Count: 1,031,783

Effect Measure

Effect Measure is a forum for progressive public health discussion and argument as well as a source of public health information from around the web that interests the Editor(s)

Search this blog

Search This Blog using Google



Profile

The Editors of Effect Measure are senior public health scientists and practitioners. Paul Revere was a member of the first local Board of Health in the United States (Boston, 1799). The Editors sign their posts "Revere" to recognize the public service of a professional forerunner better known for other things.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

&

Blogroll

Other Information

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Old Effect Measure site

Technorati Profile

« New York Times uses story, neglects to mention blogger is the source | Main | Osama visits Bush in Oz, says it's all a misunderstanding »

Flu in the slums

Category: Bird fluEpidemiologyInfectious disease
Posted on: September 6, 2007 7:11 AM, by revere

Australia's severe flu season reminds us, in dramatic fashion, that "regular" (seasonal) influenza can still be a severe disease. It's not just the elderly, but children, too. What about children in the developing world? What would you find if you went into one of Bangladesh's urban slums? We now have some information, presented as a Letter to the Editor in CDC's journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Children under the age of 13 with fever and symptoms of an influenza-like illness (dengue fever was excluded) in 2001 were tested for acute infection via antibodies to H1N1 or H3N2 influenza, influenza B, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus types 1,2 and 3, or human metapneumovirus (HMPV). The site was the Kamalapur surveillance and intervention site in a slum section in Dhaka, Bangladesh. which was divided into seven areas, each subdivided into geographic clusters of 50 - 100 houseeholds. Eighty-six cllusters were randomaly selected and 5000 househlds wh=ithin them enrolled. What did they find?

Acute infections coincided with warm pre-monsoon and monsoon periods. Of 128 children in which there was sufficient serum for influenza testing (out of a total of 198 with febrile illness during the year in these households), one in six had acute influenza infections, 10 influenza A (80% H1N1), 13 with influenza B (2 children had both A and B infections). The influenza cases were older than the non-influenza cases, but the only symptom which separated them from other viral causes of febrile respiratory illness was a greater frequency of joint and muscle aches. Only three of the influenza cases had pneumonia on clinical exam. Thus most of the cases discovered in this survey would not have come to a hospital or clinic.

What we learn is that infection with influenza virus (A and B) is the cause of a significant portion (16%) of respiratory disease in an urban slum, but that most influenza-like illness is from other agents. This is not different than elsewhere. In the event of a pandemic the proportion of influenza infections will rise dramatically but even if it goes up by a factor of five, over half of the febrile illnesses in children would still be from non flu viruses. This is something to keep in mind.

Something else to remember is that even carefully done studies like this are difficult to do and come with many caveats:

First, the surveillance system was not originally designed to identify influenza and relied on fever for specimen collection. Our retrospective selection criteria reflected the classic initial manifestations of influenza, and thus could have missed nonfebrile cases. Second, the study was not designed to reflect age distribution of children with respiratory infection, but rather those with fever and who had adequate amounts of available sera. This feature potentially biases toward older children. Third, data describe only 1 year, and patterns of illness may differ in other years. Fourth, acute infection was determined by serologic analysis. Previous studies in Bangladesh reported nutrition-related impaired immune responsiveness. Thus, some influenza-infected children who showed a nondetectable immune response may not have been included. (Brooks et al., Emerging Infectious Diseases [Epub ahead of print], cites omitted)

It's another little piece of the puzzle. Where it goes in the big pattern, where we have so many missing pieces, we don't know yet.

Comments

Right now we have an equine flu in Australia. It is estimated that it will cost the nation billions of dollars.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070906/rac_australia_influenza.html?.v=1

For many decades our quarantine service (or good luck) protected us from horse flu. In mid August a case was found. Since then, despite punitive legislative efforts, the authorities have been unable to isolate it.

After this lesson on infection it is likely that Australians (me included) will be less likely to underestimate the difficulty in isolating a human flu if it occurs.

Posted by: bar | September 6, 2007 8:40 PM

bar, I think that it is likely that the EI virus in Australia has been isolated, but that this is being withheld from the public (and international trading partners) for political reasons.

Posted by: attack rate | September 6, 2007 10:01 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. This poll cannot stand 10.10.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. McCain PWNED by Minnesota. Race Over.* 10.10.2008 · Greg Laden
  3. Dignity denied 10.10.2008 · PZ Myers
  4. The Worldnutdaily's Latest Faux Outrage 10.10.2008 · Ed Brayton
  5. The Big News 10.10.2008 · Brian Switek

Search All Blogs