Now on ScienceBlogs: Q: How do you sex a Smilodon? (A: Very carefully)

Seed Media Group

Effect Measure

Effect Measure is a forum for progressive public health discussion and argument as well as a source of public health information from around the web that interests the Editor(s)

Search

Profile

The Editors of Effect Measure are senior public health scientists and practitioners. Paul Revere was a member of the first local Board of Health in the United States (Boston, 1799). The Editors sign their posts "Revere" to recognize the public service of a professional forerunner better known for other things.

Nation-approved.sml.jpg

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Public Health/Medical Links

Bird Flu Links

Other Links

Iraq

Group Efforts

Other Information

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Old Effect Measure site

Technorati Profile

« Penalties for health care workers who don't show up in a pandemic? | Main | Flu in dogs again, but not H5N1 »

Is that a subatomic particle or are you just happy to see me?

Category: Physics
Posted on: April 2, 2008 3:27 PM, by revere

The World Wide Web began at the Swiss nuclear research facility, CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research), and that may be its biggest claim to fame. But CERN really is a nuclear research facility and is home to some of the most advanced technologies for probing the inner workings of matter, especially sub-atomic particles. For example, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is located there. Hadrons are composite subatomic particles composed of quarks. They come in two flavors, baryons (three quarks) and Mesons (a quark and an anti-quark). We learn in Wikipedia that hadrons are "single particle excitations of the basic theory of strong interactions." How do you study excited hadrons? You could use the LHC, slated to be completed in May 2008. But that might only be good for single particle excitations. What if the subatomic particle were really excited? Then, according to the New York Times, you might want to use the Large Hardon Collider.

While the Large Hadron Collider is familiar to elementary particle physicists, the Large Hardon Collider seems to be new. Thanks to a hat tip on Boingboing, we managed to find a diagram at http://largehardoncollider.com/:

lhc.small.jpg

You can read more about the Hardon Colllider here.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/68391

Comments

1

Finally, I think I understand the Hadron collider. The above diagram was very helpful.

Posted by: Michael | April 2, 2008 7:29 PM

2

This article must surely have been sourced from Master Bates.

Posted by: victoria | April 2, 2008 9:00 PM

3

Science rules!

Posted by: C. Porter | April 3, 2008 1:18 AM

4

I'm going to guess Ron Jeremy is one of there (ok, this pun makes me wince) largest contributors

Posted by: Ken Clark | April 3, 2008 10:28 AM

5

Revere, you are clearly a pervert. Without people like you and me, the word almost surely not exist, and an entire sector of psychology would also not exist! But does anybody ever give us any award or express any sort of appreciation at all? No-o-o-o-o. I guess all we can do is keep trying ...

Posted by: ssal | April 4, 2008 2:52 PM

6

Hahahaha, you're a bunch of penis heads.

Posted by: Dr Who | March 16, 2009 12:00 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM